Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:31:34.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moths trapped in Alaska with feeding attractant lures and the seasonal flight patterns of potential agricultural pests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Peter J. Landolt ,
Alberto Pantoja ,
Aaron Hagerty ,
Lars Crabo  and
Daryl Green
Peter J. Landolt*
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, Washington 98951, United States of America
Alberto Pantoja
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, Subarctic Agricultural Research Unit, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, United States of America
Aaron Hagerty
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, Subarctic Agricultural Research Unit, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, United States of America
Lars Crabo
Affiliation:
724 18th Street, Bellingham, Washington 98225, United States of America
Daryl Green
Affiliation:
USDA, ARS, Yakima Agricultural Research Laboratory, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, Washington 98951, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Traps baited with two types of chemical feeding attractants yielded 97 species of macrolepidoptera at three areas in Alaska (Fairbanks, Delta Junction, and Palmer). These were 16 geometrid, 1 thyatirid, and 76 noctuid moth species and 4 species of nymphalid butterflies. Potential crop pests trapped included Apamea devastator (Brace) (glassy cutworm), Xestia c-nigrum L. (spotted cutworm), Xestia smithii (Snellen) (Smith's dart), Euxoa ochrogaster (Guenée) (redbacked cutworm), and Discestra trifolii (Hufnagel) (clover cutworm). The clover cutworm was captured early in the season (May into June), while Smith's dart, glassy cutworm, spotted cutworm, and redbacked cutworm were captured in traps in mid to late summer. Many more species and greater numbers of moths were captured in traps baited with acetic acid and 3-methyl-1-butanol than in traps baited with a multicomponent floral lure (phenylacetaldehyde, methyl salicylate, methyl-2-methoxy benzoate, and β-myrcene). However, most of the geometrid moths captured (12 of 16 species) were in floral lure traps, while one species of Hadeninae (Noctuidae) and both species of Plusiinae (Noctuidae) were trapped exclusively in floral lure traps. The one thyatirid, both Catocalinae noctuid species, and most Amphipyrinae, Cuculliinae, Hadeninae, and Noctuinae noctuid species were captured in traps baited with acetic acid and 3-methyl-1-butanol. In addition, large numbers of bumblebees were captured in traps baited with the floral lure, while large numbers of yellowjackets were captured in traps baited with acetic acid and 3-methyl-1-butanol.

Résumé

Des pièges appâtés avec des attractifs alimentaires chimiques ont capturé 97 espèces de macrolépidoptères dans trois régions d'Alaska (Fairbanks, Delta Junction et Palmer). Parmi les papillons de nuit, il y a 16 espèces de géométridés, 1 de thyatiridés et 76 de noctuidés; les papillons de jour comptent 4 espèces de nymphalidés. Les ravageurs de culture potentiels pièges comprennent Apamea devastator (Brace) (ver-gris vitreux), Xestia c-nigrum L. (ver-gris tacheté), Xestia smithii (Snellen),Euxoa ochrogaster (Guénée) (ver-gris à dos rouge) et Discestra trifolii (Hufnagel) (ver-gris du trèfle). Le ver-gris du trèfle fût capturé tôt dans la saison (mai à juin), alors que Xestia smithii, le ver-gris vitreux, le ver-gris tacheté et le ver-gris à dos rouge sont récoltés dans les pièges du milieu à la fin de l'été. Plusieurs autres espèces et des nombres plus importants de papillons de nuit sont pris dans des pièges munis d'acide acétique et de 3-méthyl-1-butanol que dans les pièges appâtés d'un leurre à base florale et à composition complexe (phénylacétaldéhyde, salicycate de méthyle, 2-méthoxy-benzoate de méthyle et β-myrcène). Cependant, la plupart des papillons géométridés (12 de 14 espèces) ont été capturés dans les pièges à appât floral; une espèce d'hadéninés (noctuidés) et les deux espèces de plusiinés (noctuidés) ont été récoltées exclusivement dans les pièges à appât floral. La seule espèce de thyatiridés, les deux espèces de noctuidés catocalinés et la plupart des noctuidés amphipyrinés, cuculliinés, hadéninés et noctuinés ont été récoltés dans des pièges munis d'acide acétique et de 3-méthyl-1-butanol. De plus, de grands nombres de bourdons ont été recueillis dans les pièges à appât floral, alors que de nombreuses guêpes ont été retrouvées dans les pièges munis d'acide acétique et de 3-méthyl-1-butanol.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 139 , Issue 2 , April 2007 , pp. 278 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 2004. 2002 census of agriculture. Alaska State and area data. Vol. 1, Geographic Area Series. Part 2. AC-02-A-2. US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
Benz, S., Lucero, G., and Garibay, R. 2004. Alaska agricultural statistics. US Department of Agriculture, Alaska Agricultural Statistics Service, Palmer, Alaska.Google Scholar
Butler, L., Konda, V., and Strazanac, J. 2001. Light trap catches of Lepidoptera in two central Appalachian forests. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 103: 879–902.Google Scholar
Cantelo, W.W., and Jacobson, M. 1979. Phenylacetaldehyde attracts moths to bladderflower and to blacklight traps. Environmental Entomology, 8: 444–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crumb, S.E. 1956. The larvae of the Phalaenidae. US Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, 1135: 1–356.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V., and Downes, J.A. (Editors). 1997. Insects of the Yukon. Biological Survey of Canada Monograph Series No. 2. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Forbes, W.T.M. 1954. Lepidoptera of New York and neighboring states. Part 3. Noctuidae. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoirs, 329: 1–433.Google Scholar
Haynes, K.F., Zhao, J.Z., and Latif, A. 1991. Identification of floral compounds from Abelia grandiflora that stimulate upwind flight in cabbage looper moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 17: 637–646.Google Scholar
Heath, R.R., Landolt, P.J., Dueben, B., and Lenczewski, B. 1992. Identification of floral compounds of night blooming jessamine attractive to cabbage looper moths. Environmental Entomology, 21: 854–859.Google Scholar
Hodges, R.W., Dominick, T., Davis, D.R., Ferguson, D.C., Franclemont, J.G., Munroe, E.G., and Powell, J.A. (Editors). 1983. Check list of the Lepidoptera of America north of Mexico (including Greenland). E.W. Classey Ltd. and The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, London.Google Scholar
Holland, W.J. 1903. The moth book. A guide to the moths of North America. Dover Publications Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, J.D. 1987. Noctuoidea: Noctuidae (part). In The moths of America north of Mexico, fasc. 27.2. Edited by Dominick, R.B. et al. The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, J.D. 1998. Noctuoidea: Noctuidae (part). In The moths of America north of Mexico, fasc. 27.3. Edited by Dominick, R.B. et al. The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, J.D., and Poole, R.W. 1991. Noctuoidea: Noctuidae (part). In The moths of America north of Mexico, fasc. 25.1. Edited by Dominick, R.B. et al. The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Landolt, P.J. 2000. New chemical attractants for trapping Lacanobia subjuncta, Mamestra configurata, and Xestia c-nigrum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 93: 101–106.Google Scholar
Landolt, P.J., and Alfaro, J.F. 2001. Trapping Lacanobia subjuncta, Xestia c-nigrum, and Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with acetic acid and 3-methyl-1-butanol in controlled release dispensers. Environmental Entomology, 30: 656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landolt, P.J., and Hammond, P.C. 2001. Species composition of moths captured in traps baited with acetic acid and 3-methyl-1-butanol. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society, 55: 53–58.Google Scholar
Landolt, P.J., and Smithhisler, C.L. 2003. Characterization of the floral odor of Oregongrape: possible feeding attractants for moths. Northwest Science, 77: 81–86.Google Scholar
Landolt, P.J., Smithhisler, C.S., Reed, H.C., and McDonough, L.M. 2000. Trapping social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) with acetic acid and saturated short chain alcohols. Journal of Economic Entomology, 93: 1613–1618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landolt, P.J., Adams, T., Reed, H.C., and Zack, R.S. 2001. Trapping alfalfa looper moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with single and double component floral chemical lures. Environmental Entomology, 30: 667–672.Google Scholar
Landolt, P.J., Pantoja, A., and Green, D. 2005. Yellowjacket wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) trapped in Alaska with heptyl butyrate, acetic acid and isobutanol. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 102: 35–41.Google Scholar
Landolt, P.J., Adams, T., and Zack, R.S. 2006. Field response of alfalfa looper and cabbage looper moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae, Plusiinae) to single and binary blends of floral odorants. Environmental Entomology, 35: 276–281.Google Scholar
Lopez, J.D. Jr., Shaver, T.N., Beerwinkle, K.R., and Lindgren, P.D., inventors; US Department of Agriculture, assignee. 2000 June. Feeding attractant and stimulant for adult control of noctuid and/or other lepidopterous species. United States Patent US 6,074,634.Google Scholar
Mayer, M.S., and McLaughlin, J.R. 1991. Handbook of insect pheromones and sex attractants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
McGuffin, W.C. 1967–1987. Guide to the Geometridae of Canada (Lepidoptera). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada Nos. 50, 86, 101, 117, 127, and 138.Google Scholar
Meagher, R.L. Jr., 2001. Collection of soybean looper and other noctuids in phenylacetaldehydebaited traps. Florida Entomologist, 84: 154–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meagher, R.L. Jr., 2002. Trapping noctuid moths with synthetic floral volatile lures. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 103: 219–226.Google Scholar
Meagher, R.L. Jr., and Mitchell, E.R. 1999. Non-target Hymenoptera collected in pheromone and synthetic floral volatile-baited traps. Environmental Entomology, 28: 367–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, M.J. 1936. The feeding habits of the adult lepidopteran Heteroneura. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 85: 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pair, S.D., and Horvat, R.J., inventors; US Department of Agriculture, assignee. 1997 September 9. Volatiles of Japanese honeysuckle flowers as attractants for adult lepidopteran insects. United States Patent US 5,665,344.Google Scholar
Rings, R.W., Metzler, E.H., Arnold, F.J., and Harris, D.H. 1992. The owlet moths of Ohio. Order Lepidoptera, family Noctuidae. Ohio Biological Survey Bulletin, New Series Vol. 9. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Sargent, T.D. 1976. Legion of night. The underwing moths. University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Sharp, J.L., and James, J. 1979. Color preference of Vespula squamosa. Environmental Entomology, 8: 708–710.Google Scholar
Teranishi, R., Buttery, R.G., Kent, S., Takeoka, G., Lindgren, P.D., Raulston, J.R., and Shaver, T.N. 1991. Chemical composition of Gaura drummondii flower volatiles. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 3: 287–288.Google Scholar
Utrio, P. 1983. Sugaring for moths: why are noctuids attracted more than geometrids? Ecological Entomology, 8: 437–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utrio, P., and Eriksson, K. 1977. Volatile fermentation products as attractants for Macrolepidoptera. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 14: 98–104.Google Scholar
Williams, C.B. 1936. The influence of moonlight on the activity of certain nocturnal insects, particularly of the family Noctuidae as indicated by a light trap. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 90: 227–306.Google Scholar
Yamazaki, K. 1998. Communities of early spring noctuid and thyatirid moths (Lepidoptera) molassestrapped in secondary forests. Entomological Science, 1: 171–178.Google Scholar
Yela, J.L., and Holyoak, M. 1997. Effects of moonlight and meteorological factors on light and bait trap catches of noctuid moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environmental Entomology, 26: 1283–1290.Google Scholar