Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:53:04.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MORTALITY OF LARVAE IN STOCKED COHORTS OF THE DOUGLAS-FIR TUSSOCK MOTH, ORGYIA PSEUDOTSUGATA (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. R. Mason  and
T. R. Torgersen
R. R. Mason
Affiliation:
Range and Wildlife Habitat Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, La Grande, Oregon 97850
T. R. Torgersen
Affiliation:
Range and Wildlife Habitat Laboratory, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, La Grande, Oregon 97850
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cohorts of instar I larvae of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata, were stocked on branches of white fir, Abies concolor. Branches were either exposed naturally over drop-trays or protected with cages of nylon netting. Only 8.7% of the larvae in exposed cohorts survived to pupate, compared with 68.0% survival in caged cohorts where dispersal and predation were prevented. Losses from the exposed cohorts were caused mostly by arthropod predation, disappearance, and non-replaced dispersal. Disappearance of early larvae was attributed primarily to predation by spiders and insects while disappearance of late larvae was suspected to be due mostly to bird predation. In an analysis of k-values, actual or suspected predation accounted for 47.2% and dispersal 40.5% of the total loss.

Résumé

Des cohortes de larves du premier stade de la chenille à houppes du Douglas, Orgyia pseudotsugata, ont été placées sur des branches de sapin concolore, Abies concolor. Les branches ont soit été exposées naturellement au-dessus de plateaux collecteurs, soit été protégées par des cages de mousseline de nylon. Seulement 8.7% des larves exposées ont survécu jusqu'à la pupaison, alors que l'incidence de survie était de 68.0% pour les cohortes dont la prédation et la dispersion ont été empêchées. Les pertes encourues par les cohortes exposées étaient dues principalement à la prédation par arthropodes, leur disparition, ou leur dispersion sans remplacement. La disparition des jeunes larves a été attribuée principalement à la prédation par les araignées et les insectes, alors que la disparition des larves âgées a été présumée être due surtout à la prédation par les oiseaux. Une analyse des facteurs K a montré que la prédation vérifiée ou présumée a compté pour 47.2%, et la dispersion pour 40.5% des pertes totales.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 9 , September 1983 , pp. 1119 - 1127
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, R. W., Sloan, R. J., and Biazak, C. E.. 1977. Sources of mortality among late instar gypsy moth larvae in sparse populations. Environ. Ent. 6: 865–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlsten, D. L., Luck, R. F., Schlinger, E. I., Wenz, J. M., and Copper, W. A.. 1977. Parasitoids and predators of the Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), in low to moderate populations in central California. Can. Ent. 109: 727–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1969. The development and use of life tables in the study of natural insect populations. A. Rev. Ent. 14: 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendeigh, S. C. 1970. Energy requirements for existence in relation to size of birds. Condor 72: 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. R. 1976. Life tables for a declining population of the Douglas-fir tussock moth in northeastern Oregon. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69: 948–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. R. and Overton, W. S.. Predicting size and change in nonoutbreak populations of the Douglas-fir tussock moth. Environ. Ent. (in press).Google Scholar
Mason, R. R., Torgersen, T. R., Wickman, B. E., and Paul, H. G.. 1983. Regulation of a Douglas-fir tussock moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) population in the Sierra Nevada. Environ. Ent. 12: 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. G. 1979. Dispersal of early instars of the Douglas-fir tussock moth. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 72: 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, G. C., Gradwell, G. R., and Hassell, M. P.. 1973. Insect Population Ecology, An Analytical Approach. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. 212 pp.Google Scholar
Wickman, B. E. 1977. Observations on spider predation of early instar larvae of Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (McDunnough) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 53(1): 46.Google Scholar