Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:15:21.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Morphology, Life History and Habits of Betulaphis quadrituberculata (Kalt.) on Birch in New Brunswick (Homoptera: Callaphididae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

I. W. Varty
I. W. Varty
Affiliation:
Forest Entomology and Pathology Laboratory, Fredericton, New Brunswick
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Betulaphis quadrituberculata (Kalt.) is an inconspicuous leaf-feeding aphid on birches in North America and Europe, now recorded on Betula papyrifera Marsh and B. alleghaniensis Britt. in the Province of New Brunswick. Some aspects of its morphology are described in order to complement the incomplete accounts already in the literature. The viviparae are seasonally polymorphic in size and color.

In New Brunswick the aphid has an annual monoecious holocycle comprising up to 10 generations. The seasonal history and habits of the various morphs are described. The insect disperses mainly by the flight activity of the stem-mothers in spring, but in succeeding generations almost all individuals are apterous and rather sedentary in habit. Data on rate of development and fecundity are presented and briefly discussed as factors contributing to the seasonal population pattern.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 96 , Issue 9 , September 1964 , pp. 1172 - 1184
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, C. A. 1962. The influence of temperature on the growth of experimental populations of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) and Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas) (Aphididae). Canad. J. Zool. 40: 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenheimer, F. S. and Swirski, E.. 1957. The Aphidoidea of the Middle East. Weizmann Science Press of Israel, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Börner, C. 1952. Europae centralis Aphides. Die Blattläuse Mitteleuropae: Namen, Synonyme, Wirtspflanzen, Generationzyklen. Mitt. thüring. bot. Ges. 3: 57–58.Google Scholar
Cottier, W. 1953. Aphids of New Zealand. Bull. N.Z. Dep. Sci. Indust. Res. 106, 382 pp.Google Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. 1963. Reproductive activity of the sycamore aphid, Drepanosiphum platanoides (Schr.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Anim. Ecol. 32: 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, R. 1950. The climate near the ground. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glendenning, R. 1926. Some new aphids from British Columbia. Canad. Ent. 58: 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hille Ris Lambers, D. 1950. On mounting aphids and other soft-skinned insects. Ent. Ber. 13: 55–58.Google Scholar
Hille Ris Lambers, D. 1952. The aphid fauna of Greenland. Medd. Grønland 136: 23–25.Google Scholar
Hille Ris Lambers, D. 1955. The Zoology of Iceland. Copenhagen & Reykjavik 3 (52a), 18 pp.Google Scholar
Kaltenbach, J. H. 1843. Monographie der Familien Pflanzenläuse. Aachen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., and Booth, C. O.. 1951. Host alternation in Aphis fabae Scop. I. Feeding preferences and fecundity in relation to the age and kind of leaves. Ann. appl. Biol. 38: 25–64.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. S., and Stroyan, H. L. G.. 1959. Biology of aphids. Annu. Rev. Ent. 4: 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloft, W. 1957. Further investigations concerning the interrelation between bark condition of Abies alba and infestation by Adelges piceae typica and A. müsslini schneideri. Z. angew. Ent. 41: 438–442.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. 1959. The role of photoperiod and temperature in the determination of parthenogenetic and sexual forms of the aphid Megoura viciae Buckton. I. The influence of these factors on apterous virginoparae and their progeny. J. Ins. Physiol. 3: 92–117.Google Scholar
Lees, A. D. 1961. Clonal polymorphism in aphids. Symp. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 1: 68–79.Google Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F. 1959. Contributions to the knowledge of Swedish aphids. II. List of species with find records and ecological notes. Kungl. Lantbrukshögsk. Ann. 25: 375–527.Google Scholar
Pintera, A. 1955. Die Ubersicht der Tscheckoslowakischen Callaphididae. Cas. Nar. Musea. Oddprir. Roc. 124: 202–211.Google Scholar
Quednau, W. 1954. Monographie der mitteleuropäischen Callaphididae (Zierläusen Homoptera, Aphidina) unter besondere Berucksichtigung des ersten Jugendstadiums. I. Die Junglarven des ersten Stadiums der mitteleuropäischen Callaphididae. Mitt. biol. Zentanst. Berl. 78, 48 pp.Google Scholar
Richards, W. R. 1961. North American Börnerina Bramstedt and Betulaphis Glendenning (Homoptera: Aphididae). Canad. Ent. 93: 486–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, W. R. 1963. The Aphididae of the Canadian Arctic (Homoptera). Canad. Ent. 95: 449–464.Google Scholar
Szelegiewicz, H. 1958. Die Blattläuse (Homoptera: Aphidina) der Umgebung von Bydgoczcz. Fragm. faun. Mus. Zool. Polon. 8: 65–95.Google Scholar
Takahashi, R. 1961. Four new species of Callipterina from Japan (Aphididae, Homoptera). Mushi 35: 3–9.Google Scholar
Taschev, D. G. 1961. Die Blattläuse (Aphidoidea, Homoptera) auf Bäumen und Sträuchern in Bulgarien. Ann. Univ. Sofia 53: 123–155.Google Scholar
Varty, I. W. 1963. A survey of the sucking insects of the birches in the Maritime Provinces. Canad. Ent. 95: 1097–1106.Google Scholar
Varty, I. W. 1964. Erythroneura leafhoppers from birches in New Brunswick. I. Subgenus Erythridula. Canad. Ent. 96: 1244–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar