Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:59:58.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological discrimination of six species of the genus Anuraphis (Hemiptera: Aphididae), including description of a new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Sebastiano Barbagallo  and
Giuseppe E. Cocuzza
Sebastiano Barbagallo*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Fitosanitarie, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 100, Catania, 95123 Italy
Giuseppe E. Cocuzza
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Fitosanitarie, University of Catania, Via S. Sofia 100, Catania, 95123 Italy
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The most relevant morphometric characteristics of six species of the genus Anuraphis Del Guercio were compared. Anuraphis shaposhnikovisp. nov. is described and its morphological differences from the closely related species Anuraphis subterranea are presented. The new species was collected in Sicily and in the central area of the Italian peninsula on Magydaris pastinacea (Lam.) Paol. (Apiaceae) and Opopanax chironium (L.) Koch (Apiaceae), which are its secondary host plants. A key to the viviparous morphs (apterae and alatae) of the seven western Palaearctic species living on secondary hosts is provided. Discriminant functions have been derived to separate both apterae and alatae of A. shaposhnikovi and A. subterranea.

Résumé

On trouvera ici une comparaison des caractères morphométriques les plus pertinents de six espèces d'Anuraphis Del Guercio, ainsi que la description d'Anuraphis shaposhnikovisp. nov. et des caractéristiques morphologiques qui le distinguent d'Anuraphis subterranea, une espèce très apparentée. La nouvelle espèce a été récolté en Sicile et dans la région centrale de la péninsule italienne sur Magydaris pastinacea (Lam.) Paol. (Apiaceae) et sur Opopanax chironium (L.) Koch (Apiaceae) qui sont ses hôtes secondaires. Un clé permet l'identification des formes vivipares (aptères et ailées) des sept espèces de la région paléarctique occidentale qui vivent sur des hôtes secondaires. Des fonctions discrimantes facilitent la séparation des formes aptères et ailées d'A. shaposhnikovi et d'A. subterranea.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 135 , Issue 6 , December 2003 , pp. 839 - 862
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbagallo, S., Patti, I. 1998. Acquisizioni bio-ecologiche sugli afidi (Homoptera Aphididae) del territorio centro-orientale italiano. Bollettino di Zoologia Agraria e di Bachicoltura 30: 223–310Google Scholar
Barbagallo, S., Stroyan, H.L.G. 1982. Osservazioni biologiche, ecologiche e tassinomiche sull'afidofauna della Sicilia. Frustula Entomologica III(XVI): 1–182Google Scholar
Blackman, R.L. 1992. The use of ordination techniques to discriminate within pest aphid species complexes. pp 261–75 in Sorensen, J.T. and Foottit, R. (Eds), Ordination in the study of morphology, evolution and systematic of insects. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L., Eastop, V.F. 1994. Aphids on the world's trees. An identification and information guide. Wallingford and London, United Kingdom: CAB International and Natural History MuseumCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, R.L., Paterson, A.J.C. 1986. Separation of Myzus (Nectarosiphon) antirrhinii from Myzus (N.) persicae and related species in Europe. Systematic Entomology 11: 267–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastop, V.F., Hille Ris Lambers, D. 1976. Survey of the world's aphids. The Hague, the Netherlands: W Junk BV PublishersGoogle Scholar
Heie, O.E. 1992. The Aphididae (Hemiptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. IV. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica 25: 1–189Google Scholar
Hille Ris Lambers, D. 1970. The genus Nearctaphis Shaposhnikov, 1950. I. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen Proceedings 73: 48–74Google Scholar
Hodjat, S.H. 1993. A list of aphids and their host plants in Iran. Fribourg, Switzerland: University of Fribourg PressGoogle Scholar
Ilharco, F.A., van Harten, A. 1987. Systematics. pp 51–77in Minks, A.K. and Harrewijn, P. (Eds), Aphids. Their biology, natural enemies and control. Volume A. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science PublisherGoogle Scholar
Kolesova, D.A. 1972. The ecology of pear aphids of the genus Anuraphis Guercio in the Crimea. Vestnik Zoologii 3: 11–15 [In Russian]Google Scholar
Pignatti, S. 1982. Flora d'Italia. Volumes 1–3. Bologna, Italy: EdagricoleGoogle Scholar
Remaudière, G., Remaudière, M. 1997. Catalogue of the world's Aphididae. Homoptera Aphididae. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueGoogle Scholar
Sanmartin, I., Martin-Piera, F. 1999. A morphometric approach to the taxonomy of the genus Ceramida (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae). The Canadian Entomologist 131: 573–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaposhnikov, G.C.h. 1951. Aphididae of fruit trees of South Crimea. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Entomologicheskogo Obshchestva Akademiya Nauk SSSR 43: 7–36 [In Russian]Google Scholar
Shaposhnikov, G.C.h. 1964. Suborder Aphidinea — Aphids. pp 489–616in Bienko, GY Bei (Ed), Keys to insects of the European part of the USSR. Volume 1. [In Russian; English translation by the Israel Program for Scientific Translations Limited, Jerusalem. 1967. Aphidinea. pp 616–799]Google Scholar
Shaposhnikov, G.C.h. 1974. The population, the species and the genus as living systems and their structure in aphids. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Akademiya Nauk SSSR 53: 106–73 [In Russian]Google Scholar
Shaposhnikov, G.C.h. 1995. Trophic specialization and potential hosts in aphids (Homoptera, Aphidinea). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 74: 299–306 [English translation in Entomological Review 75 (1996): 21–9]Google Scholar
Shaposhnikov, G.C.h., Sharov, A.A. 1977. Variability in panmictic and clonal populations of the aphid Anuraphis farfarae Koch (Homoptera, Aphididae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 56: 601–9 [English translation in Entomological Review 57(1978): 81–7]Google Scholar
StatSoft Inc. 1996. STATISTICA version 5.1. Tulsa, Oklahoma: StatSoft IncGoogle Scholar
Tizado, E.J., Nieto Nafria, J.M. 1994. A new species of Uroleucon (Hom. Aphididae) on Andryala spp.: a multivariate analysis. The Canadian Entomologist 126: 1251–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tutin, T.G. (Editor). 1964–1980. Flora Europaea. Volumes 1–5. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Williams, D.J.M., Langor, D.W. 2002. Morphometric study of the Pissodes strobi complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The Canadian Entomologist 134: 447–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar