Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:00:59.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MONITORING FALL ARMYWORM, SPODOPTERA FRUGIPERDA (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE), MOTH POPULATIONS IN SOUTHWESTERN ONTARIO WITH SEX PHEROMONE TRAPS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. N. Starratt
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, London, Ontario N6A 5B7
D. G. R. McLeod
Affiliation:
Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, London, Ontario N6A 5B7

Abstract

Pheromone traps were more efficient than blacklight traps for detecting and monitoring adult populations of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith), in southwestern Ontario. Several dispenser–chemical combinations were strongly attractive but best results were obtained with sticky traps baited with rubber septa impregnated with combinations of (Z)-9-dodecenyl acetate and (Z)-9-tetradecenyl acetate.

Résumé

Les pièges sexuels (phéromones) s'avèrent plus efficaces que ceux à la lumière noire pour la détection et l'étude des populations adultes de la légionnaire d'automne Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) dans le sud-ouest de l'Ontario. Plusieurs combinaisons de distributeurs de produits chimiques s'avèrent très attractives, mais ce sont les pièges collants appâtés de cloisons de caoutchouc imprégnées de mélanges d'acétate de (Z) - dodécène - 9 yle et d'acétate de (Z) - tétradécène - 9 yle qui donnent les meilleurs résultats.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, T. C., Card, R. T.é and Miller, J. R.. 1980. Oriental fruit moth pheromone component emission rates measured after collection by glass-surface adsorption. J. chem. Ecol. 6: 749758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. L. and Sparks, A. N.. 1979. (Z)-9-Tetradecen-1-ol acetate a secondary sex pheromone of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith). J. chem. Ecol. 5: 721725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhr, R. J., Comeau, A., and Roelofs, W. L.. 1972. Measuring release rates of pheromone analogues and synergists from polyethylene caps. Environ. Ent. 1: 625627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, R. J. 1976. Field studies with the synthetic sex pheromone and inhibitor of the red bollworm Diparopsis castanea Hmps. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Malawi. Bull. ent. Res. 66: 243265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, R. J. 1978. Toxicity of insecticides to larvae of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 109: 6163.Google Scholar
Mitchell, E. R. 1979. Monitoring adult populations of the fall armyworm. Fla. Ent. 62: 9198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, E. R. and Doolittle, R. E.. 1976. Sex pheromones of Spodoptera exigua, S. eridania, and S. frugiperda: bioassay for field activity. J. econ. Ent. 69: 324326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekul, A. A. and Sparks, A. N.. 1967. Sex pheromone of the fall armyworm moth: isolation, identification, and synthesis. J. econ. Ent. 60: 12701272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekul, A. A. and Sparks, A. N.. 1976. Sex attractant of the fall armyworm. U.S.Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1542. 6 pp.Google Scholar
Sparks, A. N. 1979. A review of the biology of the fall armyworm. Fla. Ent. 62: 8287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starratt, A. N. and McLeod, D. G. R.. 1976. Influence of pheromone trap age on capture of the European corn borer. Environ. Ent. 5: 10081010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingle, F. C. and Mitchell, E. R.. 1975. Capture of Spodoptera frugiperda and S. exigua in pheromone traps. J. econ. Ent. 68: 613615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingle, F. C. and Mitchell, E. R.. 1979. Spodoptera frugiperda: factors affecting pheromone trap catches in corn and peanuts. Environ. Ent. 8: 989992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar