Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:20:14.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MISCELLANEOUS NOTES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

T. D. A. Cockerell
Affiliation:
Boulder, Colo.

Extract

Some of the generic names used for Scatophagid♀ will stand of fall according to one's notion of homonymy. Becker, in 1894, proposed the name Orthacheta (cf. Inded Zoologicus); Aldrich, in the interest of orthography, has altered this (Cat. N. A. Diptera) to Orthochœta. Now, Germar long ago used Orthochœtes for a beetle, while Cossmann, in 1890, used Orthochetus for a mollusc. I do not pretend to say what ought to be done with such a mix-up; it comes back to the old question, whether an error in spelling (which may hypothetically be attributed to the printer) must be maintained; and again, if not, whether the differences in the termination suffice to prevent homonymy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1905

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)