Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T05:42:14.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mating and Oviposition of Damselflies in the Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Clifford Johnson
Clifford Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, New Mexico
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Methods and materials for colonizing damselflies (Ischnura) in the laboratory are described. Adults cease escape behavior in vision-proof cages. Females copulate only after first rejecting several would-be mates in succession and do not begin to oviposit until two to four hours afterwards. Artificial Du Pont sponges provide the best material for egg deposition. Methods of rearing large larval numbers are briefly described.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , March 1965 , pp. 321 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Corbet, P. S. 1962. Age-determination of adult dragonflies. Verh. XI. int. Kongr. Ent., Wien 3: 287–289.Google Scholar
Grieve, E. G. 1937. Studies on the biology of the damselfly, Ischnura verticalis Say, with notes on certain parasites. Ent. Amer. 17: 121–153.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. 1964a. The inheritance of female dimorphism in the damselfly, Ischnura damula. Genetics 49: 513–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, C. 1964b. The seasonal ecology of Ischnura damula Calvert (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Texas J. Sci. 16: 50–61.Google Scholar
Seidel, F., and Buchholtz, C.. 1962. Versuch einer Reproduktion lebensnotwendiger physiologischer Freilandbedingungen in einem Insektenflugraum. S.B. Ges. ges. Naturw. Marburg 84: 35–63.Google Scholar