Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:30:13.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MALE INSEMINATIVE POTENTIAL IN APHYTIS LINGNANENSIS (HYMENOPTERA: APHELINIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gordon Gordh  and
Paul DeBach
Gordon Gordh
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology Laboratory, U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C.
Paul DeBach
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine the number of females a single male Aphytis lingnanensis Compere (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea) would inseminate during the course of a lifetime and the number of female progenies stemming from these copulations. Comparisons between a 25-year-old laboratory culture and a newly collected field culture of the same species indicated that reproductive effort on the part of males was similar for the two cultures. The mean total number of females copulated by an individual male during this lifetime (about 6 days) was 27.6 for the laboratory culture and 25.6 for the field culture. The mean total number of female progeny per individual male resulting from these copulations was 169.5 for the laboratory culture and 149.1 for the field culture. Males inseminated the most females on the first day of adult life. Number of copulations and inseminative ability decreased rapidly through day 4. Very few occurred during days 5 to 9, the ultimate day any occurred. Females inseminated by a male that had experienced coitus with several females earlier tended to produce more males, thus suggesting that fewer spermatozoa were transferred during later copulations.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 6 , June 1976 , pp. 583 - 589
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelrahman, I. 1974 a. The effect of extreme temperature on California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), and its natural enemies. Aust. J. Zool. 22: 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdelrahman, I. 1974 b. Growth, development and innate capacity for increase in Aphytis chrysomphali Mercet and A. melinus DeBach, parasites of California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.), in relation to temperature. Aust. J. Zool. 22: 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdelrahman, I. 1974 c. Studies in ovipositional behavior and control of sex in Aphytis melinus DeBach, a parasite of California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.). Aust. J. Zool. 22: 231–247.Google Scholar
Compere, H. 1955. A systematic study of the genus Aphytis Howard (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae) with descriptions of new species. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 10: 271–320.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. 1959. New species and strains of Aphytis (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) parasitic on the California red scale, Aonidiella aurantii (Mask.), in the Orient. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52: 354–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P. 1960. The importance of taxonomy to biological control as illustrated by the cryptic history of Aphytis holoxanthus n. sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), a parasite of Chrysomphalus aonidium, and Aphytis coheni n. sp., a parasite of Aonidiella aurantii. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53: 701–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P. 1969. Biological control of diaspine scale insects on citrus in California. Proc. 1st int. Citrus Symp. 2: 801–816.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. 1974. Biological control by natural enemies. Cambridge Univ. Press, London. 323 pp.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. and Landi, J.. 1961. The introduced purple scale parasite, Aphytis lepidosaphes Compere, and a method of integrating chemical with biological control. Hilgardia 31: 459–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBach, P. and Sisojevic, P.. 1960. Some effects of temperature and competition on the distribution and relative abundance of Aphytis lingnanensis and A. chrysomphali (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Ecology 41: 153–160.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. and Sundby, R. A.. 1963. Competitive displacement between ecological homologues. Hilgardia 34: 105–166.Google Scholar
Nagarkatti, S. 1973. Studies on the taxonomy, bionomics, ecology and genetics of different species and races of Trichogramma. Final Rept. PL-480 Project, C.I.B.C., Bangalore, India. 70 pp.Google Scholar
Rao, S. V. and DeBach, P.. 1969 a. Experimental studies on hybridization and sexual isolation between some Aphytis species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). I. Experimental hybridization and an interpretation of evolutionary relationships among the species. Hilgardia 39: 515–553.Google Scholar
Rao, S. V. and DeBach, P.. 1969 b. Experimental studies on hybridization and sexual isolation between some Aphytis species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). II. Experiments on sexual isolation. Hilgardia 39: 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, S. V. and DeBach, P.. 1969 c. Experimental studies on hybridization and sexual isolation between some Aphytis species (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). III. The significance of reproductive isolation between interspecific hybrids and parental species. Evolution 23: 525–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rössler, Y. and DeBach, P.. 1972. The bio-systematic relations between a thelytokous and an arrhenotokous form of Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). I. The reproductive relations. Entomophaga 17: 391–423.Google Scholar
Rössler, Y. and DeBach, P.. 1973. Genetic variability in a thelytokous form of Aphytis mytilaspidis (LeBaron) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Hilgardia 42: 149–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlinger, E. I. and Hall, J. C.. 1960. The biology, behavior and morphology of Praon palitans Muesebeck, an internal parasite of the spotted alfalfa aphid, Therioaphis maculata (Buckton) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53: 144–160.Google Scholar
Schlinger, E. I. and Hall, J. C.. 1961. The biology, behavior and morphology of Trioxys (Trioxys) utilis, an internal parasite of the spotted alfalfa aphid, Therioaphis maculata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 34–45.Google Scholar
Sekhar, P. S. 1957. Mating, oviposition, and discrimination of hosts by Aphidius testaceipes (Cresson) and Praon aguti Smith, primary parasites of aphids. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 50: 370–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection, Chap. 7. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), selection and the descent of man 1871–1971. Aldine, Chicago. 378 pp.Google Scholar
Wiackowski, S. K. 1962. Studies on the biology and ecology of Aphidius smithi Sharma and Subba Rao (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), a parasite of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harr.) (Homoptera, Aphididae). Polskie Pismo ent. 32: 253–310.Google Scholar
Wilkes, A. 1965. Sperm transfer and utilization by the arrhenotokous wasp Dahlbominus fuscipennis (Zett.) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). Can. Ent. 97: 647–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. 1961. Adult reproductive behaviour in Asolcus basalis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Aust. J. Zool. 9: 737–751.Google Scholar