Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:42:11.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A LIST OF THE NORTH AMERICAN SPHINGIDÆ, OR HAWK MOTHS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Extract

The present List of the North American Sphingidæ or Hawk Moths embraces the principal features of my former Lists, in particular the division into groups, retained by Butler and lately by Fernald. I have originally in our Synonymical Catalogue (1865) proposed the genera Macroglossa, Chœrocampa, Smerinthus and Sphinx as typical of the four principal groups recognized by me. A fifth group, represented by the Old World genus Acherontia, seems to me to fall in between the Smerinthinæ and Sphinginæ. It seems to me unimportant whether we consider these groups as Tribes, with the ending ini to the terms, or as Subfamilies, with the ending inœ. I am myself of the opinion that these divisions are only of tribal value, and should prefer to so designate them. But, under this view, the Family Sphingidæ, as here considered, would remain only of Subfamily value, somewhat as intended by Dr. Harris, whose “tribes” have a wider significance, whereas I intend by “tribes” assemblages of genera subordinate in rank to Subfamilies, and as intended by LeConte in Coleoptera. These matters must be left, however, to final revisions of our classification. At this moment I am interested, in view of Prof. Fernald's recent valuable paper, in defending my sequence of the genera and groups as laid down in my former papers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1886

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 How many of these eleven species, belonging to the typical group of Hemaris, are really distinct, it is difficult to say, and there must be careful breeding from the egg to decide. In collections Tenuis is usually labeled Diffinis, but the latter, from Abbot's and Boisduval's figures, differs in several points. Since Mr. Hulst has shown that Uniformis is only a dimorphic form of Thysbe, the value of the terminal band of primaries as a specific character becomes doubtful.

2 This species, Phil. Posticatus, Amph. Duponchel, have been reported to me from South Florida, but I have seen no specimens. The same is true of Macrosila Ochus, reported to me from South Texas. It is probable that most of the Cuban Sphingidæ may occur sporadically on our shores.