Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:42:54.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LABORATORY ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIAL OF 16 EXPERIMENTAL COMPOUNDS AS SOIL INSECTICIDES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. R. Harris  and
S. A. Turnbull
C. R. Harris
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, London, Ontario
S. A. Turnbull
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, London, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effectiveness of 16 experimental compounds as soil insecticides was assessed under laboratory conditions. Chlorpyrifos, carbofuran, and dieldrin were included as standard insecticides. Spectrum of activity as contact insecticides was determined using 24–48 h nymphs of the field cricket, Acheta pennsylvanicus (Burmeister), 24–48 h onion maggot adults, Hylemya antiqua (Meigen), third stage darksided cutworms, Euxoa messoria (Harris), northern corn rootworm adults, Diabrotica longicornis (Say), and honeybees, Apis mellifera L. First stage crickets were used to assess the biological activity of experimental compounds relative to soil type, moisture, and temperature and also their volatility in moist sand and persistence of biological activity over a 48 week period. All of the insecticides showed broad spectrum contact activity. Twelve showed fair to very good potential in soil. Four insecticides, Shell WL 24794 (O,O-dimethyl-S-1-[3-(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazolyl)] ethyl phosphorodithioate), Shell WL 25735 (O-[2-chloro-1-(2,5-dichlorophenyl) vinyl] O-methyl methylphosphonothioate), Shell WL 26738 (O-[1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl) vinyl] O-methyl ethylphosphonothioate), and chlorpyrifos-methyl showed good potential. Two others, Counter® (S-[(tert-butylthio) methyl] O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate) and Shell WL 24073 (O-[2-chloro-1-(2,5-dichlorophenyl) vinyl] O-methyl ethylphosphonothioate) were considered to have very good potential as soil insecticides.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 8 , August 1977 , pp. 1109 - 1114
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Harris, C. R. 1969. Laboratory studies on the persistence of biological activity of some insecticides in soils. J. econ. Ent. 62: 1437–1441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. R. 1970. Laboratory evaluation of candidate materials as potential soil insecticides. III. J. econ. Ent. 63: 782–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R. 1972. Factors influencing the effectiveness of soil insecticides. A. Rev. Ent. 17: 177–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R. 1973. Laboratory evaluation of candidate materials as potential soil insecticides. IV. J. econ. Ent. 66: 216–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, C. R. 1973. Biological activity of chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-methyl, phorate, and Counter® in soil. Can. Ent. 109: 1115–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R. and Mazurek, J. H.. 1966. Laboratory evaluation of candidate materials as potential soil insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 59: 1215–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R. and Hitchon, J. L.. 1970. Laboratory evaluation of candidate materials as potential soil insecticides. Il. J. econ. Ent. 63: 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar