Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:42:51.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INUNDATIVE RELEASE OF TRICHOGRAMMA BRASSICAE BEZDENKO (HYMENOPTERA: TRICHOGRAMMATIDAE) FOR CONTROL OF EUROPEAN CORN BORER IN SWEET CORN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Dicky S. Yu  and
J. Robert Byers
Dicky S. Yu
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, PO Box 3000, Main, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
J. Robert Byers
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, PO Box 3000, Main, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Inundative release of Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko for control of European corn borer was tested in experimental plots in 1991 and 1992 in southern Alberta, Canada, to determine its effectiveness as a potential method of control in sweet corn. The tests were conducted in 1-ha plots, in three different fields of irrigated sweet corn each year, at a release level of about 196 000 wasps per ha. The reduction in European corn borer damage in the release plots ranged from 85 to 87% in 1991 and from 45 to 95% in 1992. The reduction in damage was not significantly different in fields with 25 and 49 release points. General area degree-day accumulation for postdiapause development was not adequate to determine the timing of release for individual fields because European corn borer phenology varied among fields. Total moth catch in pheromone traps, however, was directly related to the number of plants damaged by European corn borer, and releases near the time of peak trap catch produced the greatest reduction in damage.

Résumé

La libération massive de Trichogramma brassicae Bezdenko a été expérimentée en 1991 et 1992 sur des grilles échantillons du sud de l’Alberta et son efficacité comme méthode de contrôle de la Pyrale du maïs a été mesurée dans des champs de maïs sucré. Les tests ont été faits chaque année dans des grilles de 1 ha, et environ 196 000 guêpes par ha ont été mises en liberté en trois champs irrigués de maïs sucré. La réduction des dommages causés par la pyrale dans les grilles expérimentales a été évaluée à 85–87% en 1991 et à 45–95% en 1992. La réduction des dommages n’était pas fonction du nombre de sites de relâchement et elle ne variait pas significativement, que le nombre de points de relâchement des guêpes ait été de 25 ou de 49. Le nombre de degrés-jours accumulés au cours du développement après la diapause dans une zone donnée ne pouvait pas servir à déterminer le moment optimal de libération dans un champ particulier parce que la phénologie de la pyrale variait d’un champ à l’autre. En revanche, le nombre total de papillons capturés dans des pièges à phéromone était directement relié au nombre de plants endommagés par la pyrale et la libération des guêpes au moment où les captures étaient maximales entraînait la réduction la plus importante des dommages.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 291 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, T.E., Kennedy, G.G., and Stinner, R.E.. 1982. Temperature-dependent model for postdiapause development and spring emergence of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Huebner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in North Carolina. Environmental Entomology 11: 1307–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, S.D. 1967. Water intake and the termination of diapause in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Journal of Insect Physiology 13: 739–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigler, F. 1986. Mass production of Trichogramma maidis Pint. et Voeg. and its field application against Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn. in Switzerland. Journal of Applied Entomology 101: 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bode, W.M., and Calvin, D.D.. 1990. Yield-loss relationships and economic injury levels for European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) populations infesting Pennsylvania field corn. Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 1595–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, M., and Voegele, J.. 1979. Choix de l'hote et comportement trophique des larves de Trichogramma evanescens [Hym.: Trichogrammatidae] en fonction du developpement embryonnaire de Ephestria kuehniella et Ostrinia nubilalis [Lep.: Pyralidae]. Entomophaga 24: 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, H.C., Burbutis, P.P., and Volden, C.S.. 1986. Assessing the potential of augmentation program: Trichogramma-Ostrinia system as an example. Plant Protection Bulletin (Taiwan, China) 28: 13–22.Google Scholar
Chiang, H.C., Keaster, A.J., and Reed, G.L.. 1968. Differences in ecological responses of three biotypes of Ostrinia nubilalis from the north central United States. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 61: 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrick, M.E., van Duyn, J.W., Sorenson, C.E., and Kennedy, G.G.. 1992. Effect of pheromone trap placement on capture of male European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in three North Carolina crops. Environmental Entomology 21: 240–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, A.M., and Lilly, C.E.. 1956. The Canadian Insect Pest Review 34: 252. Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Hassan, S.A. 1984. Massenproduction und Anwendung von Trichogramma. 4. Feststellung der guenstigsten Freilassungstermine fuer die Bekaempfung des Maiszuenslers Ostrinia nubilalis Huebner. Gesunde Pflanzen 36: 40–45.Google Scholar
Hassan, S.A., and Heil, M.. 1980. Bekaempfung des Maiszuenslers mit einer einmaligen Freilassung des Eiparasiten Trichogramma evanescens. Nachrichtenblattt des Deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 32: 97–99.Google Scholar
Jarvis, J.L., and Brindley, T.A.. 1965. Predicting moth flight and oviposition of European corn borer by the use of temperature accumulations. Journal of Economic Entomology 58: 300–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanour, W.W., and Burbutis, P.P.. 1984. Trichogramma nubilale (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) field releases in corn and a hypothetical model for control of European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelker, D.H., Lee, D.A., and Spence, J.R.. 1990. Use of standard temperature thresholds and phenological prediction for the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Huebner) in Alberta. The Canadian Entomologist 122: 1247–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G.G., and Anderson, T.E.. 1980. European corn borer trapping in North Carolina with various sex pheromone component blends. Journal of Economic Entomology 73: 642–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.A. 1986. Phenology, Life History and Habitat Selection of the European Corn Borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, in Alberta. Master of Science thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alta. 212 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.A. 1988. Moth density and oviposition patterns of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Alberta. Environmental Entomology 17: 220–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.A., and Spence, J.R.. 1986. Phenology of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis) in Alberta. The Canadian Entomologist 118: 943–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, D.E., and Chiang, H.C.. 1984. European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) infestations: Relating captures in pheromone and black-light traps in southern Minnesota corn fields. Journal of Economic Entomology 77: 1445–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, D.G.R., and Starratt, A.N.. 1978. Some factors influencing pheromone trap catches of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). The Canadian Entomologist 110: 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oloumi-Sadeghi, H., Showers, W.B., and Reed, G.L.. 1975. European corn borer: Lack of synchrony of attraction to sex pheromone and capture in light traps. Journal of Economic Entomology 68: 663–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Galka, B., and Timlick, B.. 1990. Phenology and infestation level of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Huebner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in southern Manitoba. The Canadian Entomologist 122: 1211–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravensberg, W.J., and Berger, H.K.. 1988. Biological control of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn., Pyralidae) with Trichogramma maidis Pintureau and Voegele in Austria in 1980–1985. pp. 557–564 in Voegele, J., Waage, J., and van Lentern, J. (Eds.), Trichogramma and other Egg Parasites, 2nd International Symposium, Guangzhou (China). Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris. 644 pp.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W.L., Du, J.-W., Tang, X.-H., Robbins, P.S., and Eckenrode, C.J.. 1985. Three European corn borer populations in New York based on sex pheromones and voltinism. Journal of Chemical Ecology 11: 829–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starratt, A.N., and McLeod, D.G.R.. 1976. Influence of pheromone trap age on capture of the European corn borer. Environmental Entomology 5: 1008–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinner, R.E., Ridgway, R.L., Coppedge, J.R., Morrison, R.K., and Dickerson, W.A. Jr., 1974. Parasitism of Heliothis eggs after field releases of Trichogramma pretiosum in cotton. Environmental Entomology 3: 497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struble, D.L., Byers, J.R., McLeod, D.G.R., and Ayre, G.L.. 1987. Sex pheromone components of an Alberta population of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hbn.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). The Canadian Entomologist 119: 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z.L. 1988. Trichogramma spp. parasitizing the eggs of Asian corn borer Ostrinia furnacalis and its efficacy in Beijing suburbs. pp. 629–632 in Voegele, J., Waage, J., and van Lentern, J. (Eds.), Trichogramma and other Egg Parasites, 2nd International Symposium, Guangzhou (China). Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris. 644 pp.Google Scholar