Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:40:04.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injury by Contarinia (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) to early-seeded and late-seeded canola in northeastern Saskatchewan, Canada, and assessment of seed treatments for midge control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2019

Juliana Soroka ,
Larry Grenkow ,
Boyd Mori  and
Lars Andreassen
Juliana Soroka*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Larry Grenkow
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Boyd Mori
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
Lars Andreassen
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A three-year field study in northeastern Saskatchewan, Canada, determined the effects of seeding date and seed treatment on feeding injury by Contarinia Róndani (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) midges to canola, Brassica napus Linnaeus (Brassicaceae), and subsequent seed yield. Emergence cage monitoring indicated the presence of two generations of midges at the four locations observed. Intensity of midge injury to canola was low, but damaged plants were common. Field location and seeding date influenced probability of midge injury and canola growth stage. The wettest of the four locations had the greatest number of midges but low levels of probability of damage in two of three years. Early-seeded plots had higher injury probability than late-seeded plots, with the highest probability of injury occurring one to two weeks after flowering commenced. Seed treatment marginally affected midge injury ratings, suggesting that insecticide efficacy dissipated before the midges attacked. Seed yield was higher in early-seeded than in late-seeded plots in two of three years, despite the greater level of damage seen in early-seeded plots. Overall, the research showed that the agronomic benefits of early seeding outweighed the effects of the midge damage observed; therefore, producers in the Canadian prairie provinces should seed canola when conditions are most agronomically suitable.

Type
Insect Management
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 151 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 219 - 235
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

2

Present address: P.O. Box 97, Dunrea, Manitoba, R0K 0S0, Canada

Subject editor: Jianghua Sun

References

Afifi, M., Lee, E., Lukens, L., and Swanton, C. 2015. Thiamethoxam as a seed treatment alters the physiological response of maize (Zea mays) seedlings to neighbouring weeds. Pest Management Science, 71: 505–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andreassen, L., Soroka, J., Grenkow, L., Olfert, O., and Hallett, R. 2018. Midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) injury to Brassicaceae in field trials in northeastern Saskatchewan, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 150: 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H.F. 1946. Gall midges of economic importance. I. Gall midges of root and vegetable crops. Crosby Lockwood & Son, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Barnes, H.F. 1950. The identity of the swede midge (Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer), with notes on its biology. Annals of Applied Biology, 37: 241–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baute, T. 2016. Crop talk: the facts on swede midge in canola [online]. Available from www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/field/news/croptalk/2016/ct-0616a6.htm [accessed 4 May 2018].Google Scholar
Bedard-Haughn, A. 2009. Managing excess water in Canadian prairie soils: a review. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 89: 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2008. Swede midge – Contarinia nasturtii. Fact sheet [online]. Canadian Food Inspection Agency Plant Health Division, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Available from www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/pestrava/connas/connase.shtml [accessed 2 May 2018].Google Scholar
Canola Council of Canada. 2014. Mitigation of risk to canola from spring flea beetle injury [online]. Canola Council of Canada, Research Summaries, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Available from http://research.canolacouncil.org/research-summaries-details/10/mitigation-of-risk-to-canola-from-spring-flea-beetle-injury [accessed 3 May 2018].Google Scholar
Canola Council of Canada. 2017a. Flea beetles. Canola encyclopedia [online]. Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Available from www.canolacouncil.org/canola-encyclopedia/insects/flea-beetles [accessed 3 May 2018].Google Scholar
Canola Council of Canada. 2017b. Seed treatments. Canola encyclopedia [online]. Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Available from www.canolacouncil.org/canola-encyclopedia/crop-establishment/seed-treatments [accessed 3 May 2018].Google Scholar
Chen, M. and Shelton, A.M. 2007. Impact of soil type, moisture, and depth on swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) pupation and emergence. Environmental Entomology, 36: 1349–1355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, W., Long, Z., Zhang, Y., Liang, T., and Zhu-Salzman, K. 2017. Effects of temperature, soil moisture and photoperiod on diapause termination and post-diapause development of the wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana (Géhin) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 103: 78–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Canada. 2018a. Canadian climate normals. 1981–2010 Climate normals and averages [online]. Available from http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/index_e.html [accessed 11 April 2018].Google Scholar
Environment Canada. 2018b. Monthly climate summaries [online]. Available from http://climate.weather.gc.ca/prods_servs/cdn_climate_summary_e.html [accessed 11 April 2018].Google Scholar
Ford, K.A., Casida, J.E., Chandran, D., Gulevich, A.G., Okrent, R.A., Durkin, K.A., et al. 2010. Neonicotinoid insecticides induce salicylate–associated plant defence responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107: 17527–17532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galway, K.E., Duncan, R.P., Syrett, P., Emberson, R.M. and Sheppherd, A.W. 2004. Insect performance and host plant stress: a review from a biological control perspective. In Proceedings of the XI international symposium on biological control of weeds. Edited by Cullen, J.M., Briese, D.T., Kriticos, D.J., Lonsdale, W.M., Morin, L., and Scott, J.K.. Commonwealth Science and Industrial Research Organisation – Entomology, Canberra, Australia. Pp. 394–399.Google Scholar
Hallett, R.H. 2017. The challenge of swede midge management in canola. In Integrated management of insect pests on canola and other Brassica oilseed crops. Edited by Reddy, G.V.. Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, Wallingford, United Kingdom. Pp. 44–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, R.H., Chen, M., Sears, M.K., and Shelton, A.M. 2009a. Insecticide management strategies for control of swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on cole crops. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102: 2241–2254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallett, R.H., Goodfellow, S.A., and Heal, J.D. 2007. Monitoring and detection of the swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 139: 700–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, R.H., Goodfellow, S.A., Weiss, R.M., and Olfert, O. 2009b. MidgEmerge, a new predictive tool, indicates the presence of multiple emergence pheonotypes of the overwintered generation of swede midge. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 130: 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, R.H. and Heal, J.D. 2001. First Neacrtic record of the swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), a pest of cruciferous crops from Europe. The Canadian Entomologist, 133: 713–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, F.R. and Berkenkamp, B. 1975. Revised growth-stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 55: 657–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J. 1984. Effects of flea beetles, Phyllotreta spp., (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), on the survival, growth, seed yield and quality of canola, rape and yellow mustard. The Canadian Entomologist, 116: 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leul, M. and Zhou, W. 1998. Alleviation of waterlogging damage in winter rape by application of unicinazole: effects on morphological characteristics, hormones, and photosynthesis. Field Crops Research, 59: 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, B.A., Andreassen, L., Heal, J.D., Dupuis, J.R., Soroka, J.J., and Sinclair, B.J. 2019. A new species of Contarinia Rondani (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) that induces flower galls on canola (Brassicaceae) in the Canadian prairies. The Canadian Entomologist, https://doi.org/10.4039/tce.2018.63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, D., Rieu, I., Mariani, C., and van Dam, N. 2016. How plants handle multiple stresses: hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory. Plant Molecular Biology, 91: 727–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olfert, O., Hallett, R., Weiss, R.M., Soroka, J., and Goodfellow, S. 2006. Potential distribution and relative abundance of swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii, an invasive pest in Canada. Entomologia Applicata et Experimentalis, 120: 221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Lamb, R.J., and McVetty, P.B.E. 1992. Screening for antixenosis resistance to flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera; Chrysomelidae), in rapeseed and related crucifers. The Canadian Entomologist, 124: 895–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, T. 2015. President’s message. In Ontario Canola Growers Association January 2015 Newsletter. Ontario Canola Growers’ Association, Markdale, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Preetha, G. and Stanley, J. 2012. Influence of neonicotinoid insecticides on the plant growth attributes of cotton and okra. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 35: 1234–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 2010. SAS/STAT for windows, version 9.3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Soroka, J.J., Dosdall, L., Elliott, R., Gavloski, J., Olfert, O., Olivier, C., and Otani, J. 2013. Mitigation of risk to canola from spring flea beetle injury. Project 3.3.4. Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.Google Scholar
Soroka, J.J., Grenkow, L.F., and Irvine, R.B. 2008. Impact of decreasing ratios of insecticide-treated seed on flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Phyllotreta spp.) feeding levels and canola seed yields. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 1811–1820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Stokes, B.M. 1953. The host plant range of the swede midge (Contarinia nasturtii Kieffer) with special reference to types of plant damage. Tijdschrift over plantenziekten, 59: 82–90.Google Scholar
Williams, J.L. and Hallett, R.H. 2018. Oviposition preference, larval distribution and impact of the swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii, on growth and yield of canola. Journal of Pest Science, 91: 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W. and Lin, X. 1995. Effects of waterlogging at different growth stages on physiological characteristics and seed yield of winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crop Research, 44: 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Soroka et al. supplementary material

Tables S2-S3

Download Soroka et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 127.7 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Soroka et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Soroka et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 78.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Soroka et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Soroka et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 91.2 KB