Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:28:58.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INFUSCATUS AND DISPAR GROUPS OF THE SPIDER GENUS PHILODROMUS IN NORTH AND CENTRAL AMERICA AND THE WEST INDIES (ARANEIDA: THOMISIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. D. Dondale  and
J. H. Redner
C. D. Dondale
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
J. H. Redner
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The infuscatus group comprises 20 species and 2 subspecies. The group is wholly American, the main habitats occurring in the dry parts of the U.SA. and Mexico. Only Philodromus infuscatus Keyserling reaches Canada, while a few species are neotropical. P. droseroides Schick is divided into P. d. droseroides of California and P. d. arizonensis ssp. n. of Arizona. Similarly P. infuscatus is divided into P. i. infuscatus of eastern U.S.A. and P. i. utus Chamberlin of western U.S.A. The following are described as new species: P. pratarioides, P. harrietae, P. mississippianus, P. separatus, P. tortus, P. probolus, P. infectus, P. longiductus, P. breviductus, P. pseudanomalus, P. mexicanus, and P. cavatus. P. dispar Walckenaer, a species introduced from the Old World, is the sole American representative of the dispar group.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 9 , September 1969 , pp. 921 - 954
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonnet, P. 1958. Bibliopraphia araneorum. Tome 2, part 4. Les Artisans de l'Imprimerie Douladoure, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Chew, R. M. 1961. Ecology of the spiders of a desert community. Jl N.Y.ent. Soc. 69: 5–41.Google Scholar
Chickering, A. M. 1940. The Thomisidae (crap spiders) of Michigan. Pap. Mich. Acad. Sci. 25: 189–237.Google Scholar
Dondale, C. D. 1961. Revision of the aureolus group of the genus Philodromus (Araneae: Thomisidae) in North America. Can. Ent. 93: 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dondale, C. D., and Redner, J. H.. 1968. The imbecillus and rufus groups of the spider genus Philodromus in North America (Araneida: Thomisidae). Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, H. S. 1963. Spiders of the University of Kansas Natural History Reservation and Rockefeller Experimental Tract. Misc. Publs Mus. nat. Hist. Univ. Kans., No. 33.Google Scholar
Locket, G. H., and Millidge, A. F.. 1951. British spiders. Vol. I. Ray Society, London.Google Scholar
Schick, R. X. 1965. The crab spiders of California (Araneida, Thomisidae). Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 129: 1–180.Google Scholar