Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:22:15.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INFLUENCE OF TEMPERATURE ON THE REPRODUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF TWO MITE PREDATORS OF THE TWO-SPOTTED SPIDER MITE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. J. McClanahan*
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Harrow, Ontario

Abstract

Oviposition of the predacious mites Phytoseiulus persimilis and Typhlodromus fallacis began 2 days after mating, reached a peak in 1 week, and then declined irregularly. The rates of oviposition were higher, and the oviposition period shorter at 26° than at 20°C. P. persimilis laid 47% more eggs than T. fallacis. The generation time for both species was very dependent on temperature. Minimum values of 112 hours for P. persimilis and 127 hours for T. fallacis were obtained at 28°.

Calculations of potential predator populations from the generation time, age-specific fecundity, and proportion of females were made on a daily basis for successive generations. The potential number of living females derived from one mated pair increased logarithmically after a few cycles representing new generations. The rate of increase of P. persimilis populations was 26% higher than that of T. fallacis, and in both species the rate at 26° was about double the rate at 20°.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1966. Disappointing results with the predator. The Grower 66: 923.Google Scholar
Birch, L. C. 1953. Experimental background to the study of the distribution and abundance of insects. I. The influence of temperature, moisture and food on the innate capacity for increase of three grain beetles. Ecology 34: 698711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravenboer, L., and Dosse, G.. 1962. Phytoseiulus riegeli Dosse as a predator of harmful mites of the group of Tetranychus urticae . Ent. exp. appl. 5: 291301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chant, D. A. 1961. The effect of prey density on prey consumption and oviposition in adults of Typhlodromus (T.) occidentalis Nesbitt (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in the laboratory. Can. J. Zool. 39: 311315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Force, D. C. 1967. Effect of temperature on biological control of two-spotted spider mites by Phytoseiulus persimi'is . J. econ. Ent. 60: 13081311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, N. W., Parr, W. J., and Gould, H. J.. 1965. Observations on the control of Tetranychus urticae Koch on cucumbers by the predatory mite Phytoseiulus riegeli Dosse. Ent. exp. appl. 8: 271281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisita, M. 1965. The fitting of the logistic equation to the rate of increase of population density. Res. Population Ecol. 7: 5255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, V. 1967. Biology of the predatory mite Phytoseiulus macropilus in Hawaii. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 905908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. C. 1965. A laboratory and greenhouse evaluation of Typhlodromus fallacis (Gar.) as a predator of Tetranychus spp. Ph.D. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Turnbull, A. L., and Chant, D. A.. 1961. The practice and theory of biological control of insects in Canada. Can. J. Zool. 39: 697753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar