Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:56:45.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

IDENTIFICATION OF CHRYSOPIDAE IN CANADA, WITH BIONOMIC NOTES (NEUROPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J.A. Garland
J.A. Garland
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald College of McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 1C0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chrysopidae in Canada comprise 24 species in 9 genera and 2 subfamilies. Additional southern species are mentioned, 1 as a new combination, and other nomenclatorial changes are reviewed in relation to the Canadian fauna. Generic diagnosis of males employs sternum VIII + IX, the arcessus, gonapsis, pseudopenis, and tignum. Generic diagnosis of females is based on the dorsal furrow, ectoprocts, spermatheca, subgenitale, and a non-genitalic trait, the innermost gradate crossvein in the wings. The ecological implications and inherent difficulties in taxonomy are discussed for coloration in Chrysopidae, to develop a practical key to differentiate 26 species using color and other non-genitalic traits. A checklist summarizes maps of the geographic distribution in Canada and notes species in Alaska, based on specimens examined. Patterns of distribution for the Canadian chrysopid fauna are either Holarctic for 1 species or indigenously Nearctic, with eastern, western, or boreal foci. Disjunctions are apparent for species with a more southern, transcontinental distribution, which enter Canada primarily in Ontario and British Columbia. Life-history and bionomic notes are limited to 6 species in Canada, for which synonymies and figures are based on specimens examined. Most data originate from studies performed in Ontario. There are 5 species of parasites from 2 chrysopids. Hosts include 11 species of insects and mites, with 2 cases of hyperpredation. Three insecticides account for the more recent scarcity of chrysopids in the Niagara region. Conclusions relate the following: variable color in the 1 Holarctic species to post-glacial mingling in the northwest; gaps in temporal and spatial distribution to extinctions in progress; and renewed interest in Chrysopidae to earlier research on this group in Canada.

Résumé

Les Chrysopides du Canada comptent 24 espèces, représentant 9 genres et 2 sous-familles. D'autres espèces vivant plus au sud sont également signalées et on propose, ici, une nouvelle combinaison en rapport avec des changements de nomenclature en cours. La diagnose générique du mâle utilise les sternites VIII + IX, ainsi que les pièces génitales: arcessus, gonapsis, pseudopénis et tignum; celle de la femelle: la ligne dorsale, les ectoproctes, la spermathèque, la plaque sous-génitale et la série des nervures scalariformes alaires internes. Les conséquences écologiques de la coloration eidonomique, et les difficultés taxonomiques qu'elles entraînent, se trouvent indiquées dans la clé d'identification pratique de 26 espèces, clé basée sur les couleurs et autres caractères non sexuels. Une liste de contrôle résume les cartes de répartition géographique des specimens examinés pour chaque espèce du Canada, avec quelques remarques sur les autres formes mises en évidence dans l'état de l'Alaska. D'une manière générale, la répartition de cette faune se conforme, pour 1 seule espèce, à une formule Holarctique, et pour le reste à une formule Néarctique autochtone, avec pour centre l'est, l'ouest ou la région boréale de l'Amérique du nord. Les espèces qui se trouvent plus vers le sud, montrent une formule transcontinentale, propre aux Etats-Unis d'Amérique et semblent avoir une répartition discontinue (quelques localités dans la province de la Colombie britannique et dans la province de l'Ontario). Les considérations biologiques et bionomiques ne concernent que 6 espèces canadiennes, pour lesquelles on indique les synonymies tirées de la littérature; quant aux figures, elle sont toutes fondées sur les specimens étudiés. Dans la plupart des cas, les données proviennent de la province de l'Ontario avec 5 espèces spongeuses sur 2 espèces chrysopes. Des hôtes abritent 11 espèces des insectes (dont il y a 2 cas de hyperprédisme). L'utilisation de 3 insecticides fait comprendre la rareté récente des chrysopes appartenant à la région du Niagara. Enfin, la variabilité chromatique de l'espèce Holarctique fait penser que les races du nord-ouest se sont mêlées après l'époque glaciaire — et des trous dans la répartition spatio-temporelle laissent supposer qu'on se trouve en présence d'un phénomène d'extinction. Néanmoins, l'étude actuelle des Névroptères, montre avec assez d'évidence tout l'intérêt et toute l'importance des recherches anciennes menées sur les chrysopes du Canada.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 117 , Issue 6 , June 1985 , pp. 737 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acker, T.S. 1960. The comparative morphology of the male terminalia of Neuroptera (Insecta). Microentomology 24: 25–84.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1957. A synonym in the genus Chrysopa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Psyche Camb. 63: 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1962. A stridulatory structure in Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 38: 178–180.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1967. A review of the Mesochrysinae and the Nothochrysinae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. 135: 215–238.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1969. New species and synonymy in the genus Meleoma (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), with a discussion of genitalic homologies. Postilla 136. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1978. A new species of Hypochrysa and a new subgenus and species of Mallada (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 54: 292–296.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1982 a. Plesiochrysa, a new subgenus of Chrysopa (Neuroptera). Neuroptera Int. 2: 27–32.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1982 b. Ceraeochrysa, a new genus of Chrysopinae (Neuroptera). Neuroptera Int. 2: 69–75.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A. 1983. A new subspecies of Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) from Cocos Island, Costa Rica (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 82: 42–45.Google Scholar
Adams, P.A., and Garland, J.A.. 1981. A new species of Chrysopiella Banks from western North America (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Can. Ent. 113: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, P.A., and Garland, J.A.. 1982. A review of the genus Mallada in the United States and Canada, with a new species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Psyche Camb. 89: 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banks, N. 1903. A revision of the Nearctic Chrysopidae. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 29: 137–162, pl. II.Google Scholar
Barnard, P.C. 1978. A check-list of the British Neuroptera with taxonomic notes. Ent. Gaz. 29: 165–176.Google Scholar
Bickley, W.E. 1952. Inheritance of some varietal characters in Chrysopa oculata Say (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Psyche Camb. 59: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickley, W.E., and MacLeod, E.G.. 1956. A synopsis of the Nearctic Chrysopidae with a key to the genera (Neuroptera). Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 58: 177–202.Google Scholar
Bowden, J. 1979. Photoperiod, dormancy and the end of flight activity in Chrysopa carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. ent. Res. 69: 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bram, R.A., and Bickley, W.E.. 1963. The green lacewings of the genus Chrysopa in Maryland (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull. Univ. Maryland agric. exp. Stn. A-124. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Briand, L.J. 1931. Notes on Chrysopa oculata Say and its relation to the Oriental peach moth (Laspeyresia molesta Busck) infestation in 1930. Can. Ent. 63: 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, N.R., and Clark, R.C.. 1956. Studies of predators of the balsam woolly aphid, Adelges piceae (Ratz.) (Homoptera: Adelgidae) II. An annotated list of the predators associated with the balsam woolly aphid in eastern Canada. Can. Ent. 88: 678–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, G.E., and Bracken, G.. 1976. Chrysopid predation on bertha armyworm. Man. Ent. 10: 26–30.Google Scholar
Burgess, L. 1980. Predation on adults of the flea beetle Phyllotreta cruciferae by lacewing larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Can. Ent. 112: 745–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennys, A.A. 1927. Some notes on the hibernating habits of insects in dry trees in the interior of B.C. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 24: 19–25.Google Scholar
Dorokhova, G.I. 1979. The family Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) in the USSR. Ent. Rev. Wash. 58: 55–59.Google Scholar
Duelli, P. 1980 a. Adaptive dispersal and appetitive flight in the green lacewing, Chrysopa carnea. Ecol. Ent. 5: 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duelli, P. 1980 b. Preovipository migration flights in the green lacewing, Chrysopa carnea (Planipennia, Chrysopidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7: 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dustan, G.G. 1961. The Oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) in Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 91(1960): 215–227.Google Scholar
Foster, R.E. 1942. Insects active throughout the winter at Vancouver, B.C. Part I: introduction and lists of the Coleoptera and Neuroptera. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 38(1941): 19–23.Google Scholar
Garland, J.A. 1979. Meleoma schwarzi: an addition to the Canadian fauna (Neuropteroida Planipennia: Chrysopidae). Can. Ent. 111: 745–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, J.A. 1981[1982]. The Taxonomy of the Chrysopidae of Canada and Alaska (Insecta: Neuroptera). Ph.D. thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
Garland, J.A. 1984. Catalogue of Chrysopidae of Canada and Alaska. Neuroptera Int. 3: 93–94.Google Scholar
Garland, J.A. 1985. Une synonymie nouvelle dans les Chrysopes Nord-américaines, avec désignation d'un néotype. Neuroptera Int. 4. In press.Google Scholar
Garlick, W.G.P. 1955. Field studies of natural control of the codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (L.), and of the interrelated fauna in apple orchards in Ontario. A. Rep. Ent. Lab. (Vineland Stn.) Canada Dep. Agric. 2: 265–391.Google Scholar
Glick, P.A. 1939. The distribution of insects, spiders, and mites in the air. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 673.Google Scholar
Gosse, P.H. 1840. The Canadian Naturalist. A series of conversations on the natural history of Lower Canada. Facs. Repr. (1971), Coles Publ. Co., Toronto. xii + 372 pp.Google Scholar
Grobler, J.H. 1962. The life history and ecology of the woolly pine needle aphid, Schizolachnus pini-radiatae (Davidson) (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Ent. 94: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, H. 1861. Synopsis of the Neuroptera of North America, with a list of South American species. Smithson. misc. Collns. xx + 347 pp.Google Scholar
Hagley, E.A.C. 1975. The arthropod fauna in unsprayed apple orchards in Ontario. II. Some predacious species. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 105(1974): 28–40.Google Scholar
Hagley, E.A.C. 1979. Integrated pest management — insecticides and natural predator populations on apple. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 109(1978): 9–21.Google Scholar
Henry, C.S. 1979. The courtship call of Chrysopa downesi Banks [sic] (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): its evolutionary significance. Psyche Camb. 86: 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herne, D.H.C., and Putman, W.L.. 1966. Toxicity of some pesticides to predaceous arthropods in Ontario peach orchards. Can. Ent. 98: 936–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölzel, H. 1970. Zur generischen Klassifikation der paläarktischen Chrysopinae. Eine neue Gattung und zwei neue Untergattungen der Chrysopidae (Planipennia). Z. Arbgem. öst. Ent. 22: 44–52.Google Scholar
Howden, H.F. 1970. Coleoptera. In Fauna of Sable Island and its zoogeographic affinities — a compendium. Natl. Mus. Can. Publ. Zool.\ 4. 45 pp.Google Scholar
Hudson, G.V. 1950. Fragments of New Zealand Entomology. Ferguson & Osborn, Ltd., Wellington. 188 pp.Google Scholar
Huebner, E. 1980. Spermathecal ultrastructure of the insect Rhodnius prolixus Stål. J. Morph. 166: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hwang, J.C., and Bickley, W.E.. 1961. The reproductive system of Chrysopa oculata (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 422–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1949. Emergence of the lacewing, Chrysopa harrisii Fitch (Neuroptera) and three hymenopterous parasites from the cocoon. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 42: 461–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1964. Insects and spiders from goldenrod galls of Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis Riley (Gelechiidae). Can. Ent. 96: 987–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judd, W.W. 1967. Insects and other arthropods from year-old galls caused by Gnorimoschema gallaesolidaginis Riley (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on goldenrod. Can. J. Zool. 45: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutson, H. 1980. Obituary. Roger Cletus Smith 1888–1980. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 26: 415–416.Google Scholar
McMullen, R.D. 1971. Psylla pyricola Förster, pear psylla (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). In Biological control programmes against insects and weeds in Canada, 1959–1968. Commonw. Inst. biol. Contr. Tech. Commun. 4. 266 pp.Google Scholar
McMullen, R.D., and Jong, C.. 1967 a. New records and discussion of predators of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Förster, in British Columbia. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 64: 35–40.Google Scholar
McMullen, R.D., and Jong, C.. 1967 b. The influence of three insecticides on predation of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola. Can. Ent. 99: 1292–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, B.J., and Morgan, C.V.G.. 1975. Mites and insects collected from vineyards in the Okanagan and Similkameen Valleys, British Columbia. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 72: 9–14.Google Scholar
Matsuda, R. 1976. Morphology and evolution of the insect abdomen. Pergamon Press, New York, Toronto. viii + 534 pp.Google Scholar
New, T.R. 1975. The biology of Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae (Neuroptera), with reference to their usage as biocontrol agents: a review. Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 127: 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New, T.R. 1980. A revision of the Australian Chrysopidae (Insecta: Neuroptera). Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. 77. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Parfin, S.I. 1952. The Megaloptera and Neuroptera of Minnesota. Am. Midl. Nat. 47: 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philippe, R. 1972. Les appareils génitaux mâle et femelle de Chrysopa perla (Neuroptera) étude anatomique, histologique et fonctionnelle. Ann. Soc. ent. Fr. (S.N) 8: 693–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philogene, B.J.R., and Chang, J.F.. 1979. New records of parasitic chalcidoids of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in Ontario, with observations on the current world status of its parasitoids and predators. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 109(1978): 53–60.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1869. Insectes utiles. Les Chrysopes. Naturaliste Can. 1: 138–140.Google Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1932 a. Chrysopids as a factor in the natural control of the Oriental fruit moth. Can. Ent. 64: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1932 b. Chrysopids as a factor in the natural control of the Oriental fruit moth. A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 62(1931): 44–45.Google Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1937. Biological notes on the Chrysopidae. Can. J. Res. (D) 15: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1955. Bionomics of Stethorus punctillum Weise (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in Ontario. Can. Ent. 87: 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1956. Differences in susceptibility of two species of Chrysopa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to DDT. Can. Ent. 88: 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1963 a. Nectar of peach-leaf glands as insect food. Can. Ent. 95: 108–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1963 b. The codling moth, Carpocapsa pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): a review with special reference to Ontario. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 93(1962): 22–60.Google Scholar
Putman, W.L., and Herne, D.C.. 1958. Natural control of phytophagous mites (Tetranychidae and Eriophyidae) in Ontario peach orchards. Proc. Xth int. Congr. Ent. (1956) 4: 667–673.Google Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1960. Effects of sevin on phytophagous mites and predators in an Ontario peach orchard. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 40: 198–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putman, W.L. 1966. The role of predators and other biotic agents in regulating the population density of phytophagous mites in Ontario peach orchards. Can. Ent. 98: 808–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A.G. 1952. Annotated list of predators of tetranychid mites in Manitoba. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 82(1951): 33–37.Google Scholar
Ross, W.A. 1932. History of the Oriental fruit moth infestation in the Niagara Peninsula. A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 62(1931): 40–43.Google Scholar
Ross, W.A., and Putman, W.L.. 1934. The economic insect fauna of Niagara peach orchards. A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 64(1933): 36–41.Google Scholar
Scott, J.A. 1979. Compendium of pest control products registered in Canada. Agric. Canada. 1654 pp.Google Scholar
Scudder, G.G.E. 1979. Present patterns in the fauna and flora of Canada. pp. 87–179 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its insect fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108. 573 pp.Google Scholar
Séméria, Y. 1977. Discussion de la validité taxonomique du sous-genre Chrysoperla Steinmann (Planipennia, Chrysopidae). Nouv. Rev. Ent. 7: 235–238.Google Scholar
Sheldon, J.K., and MacLeod, E.G.. 1974. Studies in the biology of the Chrysopidae. V. The developmental and reproductive maturation rates of Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ent. News 85: 159–169.Google Scholar
Smith, R.C. 1922. The biology of the Chrysopidae. Cornell Univ. agric. exp. Stn. Mem. 58: 1286–1372.Google Scholar
Smith, R.C. 1932. The Chrysopidae (Neuroptera) of Canada. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 25: 579–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R.C. 1934. Notes on the Neuroptera and Mecoptera of Kansas, with keys for the identification of species. J. Kansas ent. Soc. 7: 120–145.Google Scholar
Steenburgh, W.E. 1931. The biological control factors affecting the abundance of the Oriental peach moth (Laspeyresia molesta Busck) in Ontario during 1930. A. Rep. ent. Soc. Ont. 61(1930): 57–65.Google Scholar
Stoll, N.R., Dollfus, R.P., Forest, J., Riley, N.D., Sabrosky, C.W., Wright, C.W., and Melville, R.V.. 1961. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature adopted by the XVth International Congress of Zoology. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London. xvii + 176 pp.Google Scholar
Tauber, C.A. 1969. Taxonomy and biology of the lacewing genus Meleoma (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Univ. Calif. Publ. Ent. 58: 1–94.Google Scholar
Tauber, M.J., and Tauber, C.A.. 1979. Inheritance of photoperiodic responses controlling diapause. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 25: 125–128.Google Scholar
Throne, A.L. 1971. The Neuroptera — suborder Planipennia of Wisconsin. Part I — Introduction and Chrysopidae. Mich. Ent. 4: 65–78.Google Scholar
Tjeder, B. 1960. Neuroptera from Newfoundland, Miquelon, and Labrador. Opusc. ent. 25: 146–149.Google Scholar
Tjeder, B. 1966. Neuroptera — Planipennia. The lacewings of southern Africa. 5. Family Chrysopidae. S. Afr. Anim. Life 12: 228–534.Google Scholar
Townes, H. 1977. A revision of the Heloridae (Hymenoptera). Contr. Am. ent. Inst. 15(2). 9 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1852. Catalogue of the Specimens of Neuropterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum. Part II. 193–476. Newman, London. 476 pp.Google Scholar
Watson, T.K., and Wilde, W.H.A.. 1963. Laboratory and field observations of the pear psylla in British Columbia. Can. Ent. 95: 435–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westigard, P.H., Gentner, L.G., and Berry, D.W.. 1968. Present status of biological control of the pear psylla in southern Oregon. J. econ. Ent. 61: 740–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, W.H.A. 1962. Bionomics of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster in pear orchards of the Kootenay Valley of British Columbia, 1960. Can. Ent. 94: 845–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilde, W.H.A. 1963. Hyperpredators of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster (Homoptera: Chermidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 60: 48–49.Google Scholar
Wilde, W.H.A., and Watson, T.K.. 1963. Bionomics of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster, in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 41: 953–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar