Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:21:22.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Host abundance of crane flies (Diptera: Limoniidae) and their role as phoronts of Acari (Arachnida) inhabiting fungal sporophores

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Masahiro Sueyoshi*
Affiliation:
Forest Zoology Group, Kyushu Research Center, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 4-11-16 Kurokami, Kumamoto 860-0862, Japan
Kimiko Okabe
Affiliation:
Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, 1 Matsunosato, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japan
Takeyuki Nakamura
Affiliation:
Tochigi Prefectural Museum, 2-2 Mutsumi-cho, Utsunomiya, Tochigi 320-0865, Japan
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

We examined host abundance of limoniid flies between Agaricales (gill mushrooms) and Aphyllophorales (non-gilled fungi) and the importance of these flies as phoronts of mites inhabiting these fungal orders. Fungal sporophores were collected around transects established in five different-aged (13 to more than 100 years) forest stands from spring to fall in temperate forests of Japan. Limoniid flies and mites were collected from sporophores during transect sampling and reared from sporophores in the laboratory. All 11 limoniid species reared from sporophores used Aphyllophorales and six of these limoniid species also used Agaricales as their hosts. The total number of limoniid flies reared from Aphyllophorales was approximately seven times that reared from Agaricales. Eight of 15 Aphyllophorales species yielded multiple limoniid species. We conclude that Aphyllophorales are more important as hosts for fungivorous limoniid flies than Agaricales. Even a single fungal species can support more than one limoniid or mite species. One or two limoniid species are phoronts for one to three mite species inhabiting sporophores of Agaricales and Aphyllophorales. These flies have an important role as phoronts for some mite genera inhabiting fungal sporophores.

Résumé

Nous avons comparé l'abondance des diptères limoniidés chez les champignons-hôtes agaricales (champignons à lamelles) et aphyllophorales (champignons sans lamelles) et déterminé l'importance de ces mouches comme phorontes des acariens qui habitent les champignons de ces deux ordres. Nous avons récolté des sporophores de champignons de part et d'autre de transects dans des boisés représentant des forêts tempérées japonaises de cinq âges différents (13 à plus de 100 ans) du printemps à l'automne. Nous avons obtenu les diptères limoniidés et les acariens en échantillonnant sur les transects et par élevage des sporophores en laboratoire. Les 11 espèces de limoniidés élevées à partir des sporophores utilisent toutes les aphyllophorales comme hôtes et six d'entre elles se retrouvent aussi sur les agaricales. Le nombre total de diptères limoniidés obtenus par élevage sur les aphyllophorales est d'environ sept fois le nombre obtenu sur les agaricales. Huit des 15 espèces d'aphyllophorales ont produit plusieurs espèces de limoniidés. Les aphyllophorales sont donc des hôtes plus importants pour les diptères limoniidés mycétophages que les agaricales. Une seule espèce de champignon peut même servir d'hôte à plus d'une espèce de limoniidés et d'acariens. Typiquement, une ou deux espèces de limoniidés servent de phorontes pour une à trois espèces d'acariens habitant les sporophores d'agaricales ou d'aphyllophorales. Ces mouches jouent un rôle important comme phorontes pour certains genres d'acariens qui vivent dans les sporophores de champignons.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, C.P. 1920. Crane flies of New York, Part 2. Biology and phylogeny. Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station Memoir, 387: 6911133.Google Scholar
Aoki, J. 1999. Pictorial keys to soil animals of Japan. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Atauri, J.A., and de Lucio, J.V. 2001. The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 16: 147159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binns, E.S. 1982. Phoresy as migration — some functional aspects of phoresy in mites. Biological Review, 57: 571620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunyard, B.A. 2003. Biodiversity and ecology of mycophagous Diptera in northeastern Ohio. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 105: 847858.Google Scholar
Buxton, P.A. 1960. British Diptera associated with fungi. III. Flies of all families reared from about 150 species of fungi. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 46: 6194.Google Scholar
Chandler, P. 1978. Associations with plants, fungi. In A dipterist's handbook. Edited by Stubbs, A. and Chandler, P.. The Amateur Entomologists' Society, Richmond, Surrey. pp. 199211.Google Scholar
Ehara, S. 1980. Illustrations of the mites and ticks of Japan. Zenkoku Noson Kyoiku Kyokai, Tokyo. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Ferrar, P. 1987. A guide to the breeding habits and immature stages of Diptera Cyclorrhapha. Entomonograph, 8(1–2): 1907.Google Scholar
Halliday, R.B., Walter, D.E., and Lindquist, E.E. 1998. Revision of the Australian Ascidae (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 12: 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hongo, T., and Izawa, M. 2002. Kinoko. 4th ed. Yama-Kei Publishers Co., Ltd., Tokyo. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Houck, M.A., and OConnor, B.M. 1991. Ecological and evolutionary significance of phoresy in the Astigmata. Annual Review of Entomology, 36: 611636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R.D., and Jackson, C.G. 1958. A review of the Anoetidae (Acari). The Virginia Journal of Science, 9: 1198.Google Scholar
Hunter, P.E., and Rosario, R.M.T. 1988. Associations of Mesostigmata with other arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 33: 393417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, N.W., Read, W.H., and Hesling, J.J. 1969. The pests of protected cultivation. Edward Arnold Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Imazeki, R., and Hongo, T. 1989. Colored illustrations of mushrooms of Japan. Vol. II. Hoikusya Publishing Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Iwamura, M. 1961. Study of pest control of Japanese pine mushroom. Forestry Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Iwamura, M., and Nobuchi, A. 1954. Injurious insects of pine mushroom (4). Fauna of insects of Japanese pine mushroom. Kontyu, 22: 712. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Klimov, P.B. 1999 (2000). A description of a new genus, Umakefeq gen.n., including three new species of mycetophagous acarid mites (Acariformes, Acaridae) from Eastern Palaearctic. Acarina, 7: 93106.Google Scholar
Krantz, G.W. 1978. A manual of acarology. 2nd ed. Oregon State University Book Stores Inc., Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
Kuramoto, N., and Sonoda, Y. 2003. Conserving biological diversity. In Satoyama, the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Edited by Takeuchi, K., Brown, R.D., Washitani, I., Tsunekawa, A., and Yokohari, M.. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo. pp. 8189.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E.E. 1963. A taxonomic review of the genus Hoploseius Berlese (Acarina: Blattisocidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 95: 11751185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E.E. 1975. Associations between mites and other arthropods in forest floor habitats. The Canadian Entomologist, 107: 425437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masaki, T., Suzuki, W., Niiyama, K., Iida, S., Tanaka, H., and Nakashizuka, T. 1992. Community structure of a species-rich temperate forest, Ogawa Forest Reserve, central Japan. Vegetatio, 98: 97111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, Y. 1983. Mycophagous Insects. Shokubutu to Shizen, 17(12): 1821. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Norton, R.A. 1980. Observations on phoresy by oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatei). International Journal of Acarology, 6: 121130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OConnor, B.M. 1984. Acarine–fungal relationships: the evolution of symbiotic associations. In Fungus–insect relationships: perspective in ecology and evolution. Edited by Wheeler, Q. and Blackwell, M.. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 354381.Google Scholar
OConnor, B.M. 1991. A preliminary report on the arthropod-associated astigmatid mites (Acari: Acariformes) of the Huron Mountains of northern Michigan. Michigan Academician, 24: 307320.Google Scholar
Okabe, K., and Amano, H. 1993. Mite species collected from field mushrooms (II): Mesostigmata, Prostigmata, and Astigmata. Journal of the Acarological Society of Japan, 2: 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, D.P., and Verma, A.N. 1968. The arthropod fauna associated with the birch bracket fungus, Polyporus betulinus, in eastern Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 100: 11791199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rack, G. 1976. Milben (Acarina) von europaeischen Limoniinen (Diptera, Nematocera). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen Zoologischen Museum und Institut, 73: 6385.Google Scholar
Samšiňák, K. 1991. Some relationships between mites and insects. Acta scientiarum naturalium academiae scientiarum Bohemoslovacae Brno, 25: 158.Google Scholar
Savchenko, E.N., Oosterbroek, P., and Starý, J. 1992. Limoniidae. In Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. Edited by Soós, Á., Papp, L., and Oosterbroek, P.. Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary. pp. 183369.Google Scholar
Smith, J.E., Molina, R., Huso, M.M.P., Luoma, D.L., McKay, D., Castellano, M.A., Lebel, T., and Valachovic, Y. 2002. Species richness, abundance, and composition of hypogeous and epigeous ectomycorrhizal fungal sporocarps in young, rotation-age, and old-growth stands of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) in the Cascade Range of Oregon, U.S.A. Canadian Journal of Botany, 80: 186204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, W. 2002. Forest vegetation in and around Ogawa Forest Reserve in relation to human impact. In Diversity and interaction in a temperate forest community. Ogawa Forest Reserve of Japan. Edited by Nashizuka, T. and Matsumoto, Y.. Springer-Verlag, Tokyo. pp. 2741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tokunaga, M., Ishida, H., and Nobuchi, A. 1954. Crane-flies injurious to useful mush-rooms in Japan, with revision of the Japanese Ula species and descriptions of a known and three new species and immature stages. Scientific Reports of the Saikyo University, Agriculture, 6: 110.Google Scholar
Tsuno, N. 2001. The community structure of mycophagous insects in Kyoto, central Japan. Japanese Journal of Ecology, 51: 7386. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Whitsel, R.H., and Schoeppner, R.F. 1973. Mites associated with aquatic and semi-aquatic Diptera from San Mateo County, California (Acarina: Hygrobatidae, Unionicolidae, Pionidae, Ascidae and Diptera: Chironomidae, Tipulidae, Psychodidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 75: 7177.Google Scholar