Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T09:48:32.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE GREEN APPLE APHID, APHIS POMI DEGEER (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE), AS PREY OF POLYPHAGOUS ARTHROPOD PREDATORS IN ONTARIO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Elmer A.C. Hagley
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0
W.R. Allen
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada Research Station, Vineland Station, Ontario, Canada L0R 2E0

Abstract

In Ontario several species of polyphagous arthropods consumed nymphs and apterous adults of the green apple aphid, Aphis pomi DeGeer, as determined by serological assays and feeding trials. The most abundant predators on apple tree foliage were the reduviid Acholla multispinosa L., the mirid Campylomma verbasci (Meyer), the coccinellids Coccinella septempunctata L. and Adalia bipunctata L., and coccinellid and chrysopid larvae. An efficacy index developed to assess the effectiveness of foliage-inhabiting predators indicated that those with the greatest potential were Chrysopa larvae and adult C. septempunctata in 1987, and adult C. septempunctata and C. verbasci in 1988. The earwig, Forficula auricularia L., showed potential as a predator of A. pomi in 1989. Of the epigeal arthropods tested, the carabids Amara aenea DeGeer, Bembidion quadrimaculatum oppositum L., and Harpalus aeneus F., and the ants Formica fusca group, Myrmica ameryana Forel, and M. monticola Wheeler were the most active feeders on A. pomi.

Résumé

En Ontario, plusieurs espèces d’arthropodes polyphages ont dévoré les nymphes et les adultes aillés du puceron vert du pommier, Aphis pomi DeGeer, comme déterminé par les essaies sérologiques et les épreuves de nutrition. Parmi les prédateurs les plus abondants au feuillage des pommiers ont été la réduve Acholla multispinosa L., la punaise Campylomma verbasci (Meyer), les coccinelles Coccinella septempunctata L. et Adalia bipunctata L., et les larves de coccinelles et des chrysopes. Un indice d’efficacité développé pour évaluer l’efficacité des prédateurs habitant le feuillage a signalé que ceux au plus grand potentiel ont été les larves de Chrysopa et les adultes de C. septempunctata in 1987, et les adultes de C. septempunctata et de C. verbasci en 1988. Le perce-oreille, Forficula auricularia L., a démontré du potentiel comme prédateur d’A. pomi en 1989. Des arthropodes épigés qui ont été étudiés, les carabes Amara aenea DeGeer, Bembidion quadrimaculatum oppositum L. et Harpalus aeneus F., et les fourmis du groupe Formica fusca, Myrmica ameryana Forel et M. monticola Wheeler ont été les mangeurs d’A. pomi les plus actifs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W.R., and Hagley, E.A.C.. 1982. Evaluation of immunoelectroosmophoresis on cellulose polyacetate for assessing predation of Lepidoptera (Tortricidae) by Coleoptera (Carabidae) species. Can. Ent. 114: 10471054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, W.R., and Hagley, E.A.C.. 1990. Epigeal arthropods as predators of mature larvae and pupae of the apple maggot, (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ. Ent. 19: 309312.10.1093/ee/19.2.309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asgari, A. 1966. Investigations on the arthropods occurring in the area of Hohenheim near Stuttgart as the most important predators of Aphis pomi. Z. Angew. Zool. 53: 3593. [Cited in Rev. appl. Ent. 55(1967): 421.]Google Scholar
Bouchard, D., Pilou, J.G., and Tourneur, J.C.. 1988. Voracity of mirid, syrphid and ceccidomyiid predators under laboratory conditions. pp. 231234 in Niemczyk, E., and Dixon, A.F.G. (Eds.), Ecology and Effectiveness of Aphidophaga. SPB Academic Publ. Co., The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bouchard, D., Tourneur, J.C., and Paradis, R.O.. 1982. The entomophagous complex controlling populations of Aphis pomi DeGeer (Homoptera: Aphididae) in southwestern Quebec. Preliminary Data. Ann. ent. Soc. Quebec 27: 8093.Google Scholar
Carroll, D.P., and Hoyt, S.C.. 1984. Natural enemies and their effects on apple aphid, Aphis pomi DeGeer (Homoptera: Aphididae), colonies on young apple trees in central Washington. Environ. Ent. 13: 469481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, D.P., Walker, J.T.S., and Hoyt, S.C.. 1985. European earwigs (Dermaptera: Forficulidae) fail to control apple aphids on bearing apple trees and woolly aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) in apple rootstock stool beds. J. econ. Ent. 78: 972974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, A.E.F. 1968. Some factors influencing the occurrence and site of oviposition by aphidophagous Syrphidae (Diptera). Ann. appl. Biol. 61: 435446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E.A.C. 1989. Release of Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) for control of the green apple aphid, Aphis pomi DeGeer (Homoptera: Aphididae). Can. Ent. 121: 309314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E.A.C., and Allen, W.R.. 1988. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as predators of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 120: 917925.10.4039/Ent120917-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagley, E.A.C., and Roberts, W.P. 1987. Green Apple Aphid. Pest Management Program for Apple Series, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Agdex No. 211634, January 1987.Google Scholar
Holdsworth, R.P. Jr., 1970. Aphids and aphid enemies: effect of integrated control in an Ohio apple orchard. J. econ. Ent. 63: 530535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kan, E. 1989. Assessment of aphid colonies by hoverflies. III. Pea aphids and Episyrphus baltaeatus (de Geer) (Diptera: Syrphidae). J. Ethol. 7: 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R.S., and Burks, B.D.. 1979. Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC. pp. 1347–1348, 1448, 14521453.Google Scholar
Niemczyk, E. 1978. Campylomma verbasci Mey-Dur (Heteroptera: Miridae) as a predator of aphids and mites in apple orchards. Bull. Ent. de Pologne 48: 221235.Google Scholar
Niemczyk, E. 1988. Effectiveness of the bark bug (Anthocoris nemorum L.) as a predator of green apple aphid (Aphis pomi De Geer). pp. 279283 in Niemczyk, E., and Dixon, A.F.G (Eds.), Ecology and Effectiveness of Aphidophaga. SPB Academic Publ. Co., The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Niemczyk, E., and Pruska, M.. 1986. The occurrence of predators in different types of colonies of apple aphids. pp. 303310 in Hodek, I. (Ed.), Ecology of Aphidophaga. Academia, Prague, Dr. W. Junk, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Nappert, F., Smith, J.D., and Mols, P.J.M.. 1987. A laboratory evaluation of the European earwig, Forficula auricularia L. as a predator of the woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum Hansin. In XXXIX Int. Symposium on Crop Protection, Dept. of Entomol. Agric. Univ., Wageningen, The Netherlands. [Cited in Rev. appl. Ent. Ser. A 75(12): 519.]Google Scholar
Olszak, R.W. 1988. Voracity and development of three species of Coccinellidae preying upon different species of aphids. pp. 4752 in Niemczyk, E., and Dixon, A.F.G. (Eds.), Ecology and Effectiveness of Aphidophaga. SPB Academic Publ. Co., The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1985. SAS Users Guide: Statistics, 5th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. 956 pp.Google Scholar
Stap, J.S., Mueller, T.F., Drukker, B., van des Polom, J., Mols, P.J.M., and Blommers, L.H.M.. 1987. Field studies on the European earwig Forficula auricularia L. as a predator of the woolly apple aphid Eriosoma lanigerum Hansin. In XXXIX Int. Symposium on Crop Protection, Dept. of Entomol. Agric. Univ., Wageningen, The Netherlands. [Cited in Rev. appl. Ent. Ser. A 77(7): 519.]Google Scholar
Tracewski, L.T., Johnson, P.C., and Eaton, A.T.. 1984. Relative densities of predacious diptera (Diptera: Ceccidomyiidae, Syrphidae, Chamaemyiidae) and their aphid prey in New Hampshire apple orchards. Prot. Ecol. 6: 199207.Google Scholar