Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:53:32.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global review of some Anthroleucosomatidae (Diplopoda: Chordeumatida) with description of a new millipede genus from the Balkan Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

B.P.M. Ćurčić ,
S.E. Makarov ,
V.T. Tomić  and
B.M. Mitić
B.P.M. Ćurčić*
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
S.E. Makarov
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
V.T. Tomić
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
B.M. Mitić
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, Studentski Trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The millipede Perunosoma trojanicagen. nov., sp. nov. is described on the basis of specimens from the Prekonoška Pećina Cave in southeast Serbia. Scanning electron micrographs of the gonopods and legs are presented. Comparative photomicrographs of the closely related genus Serbosoma Ćurčić and Makarov, 2000 are also presented. The central part of the anterior gonopods in these genera can be species-specific and provide grounds for initial recognition of species. The Anthroleucosomatidae occupy three disjunct areas globally: one on the west coast of North America, the second in Asia, and the third in Europe. The North American anthroleucosomatid fauna is composed of one monotypic genus, while the Asian one includes six genera with seven species and the much more diverse European anthroleucosomatids include 14 genera with 39 species.

Résumé

Nous décrivons Perunosoma trojanicagen. nov., sp. nov. d'après des spécimens provenant de la caverne de Prekonoška Pećina en Serbie du sud-est. Nous présentons des micrographies au microscope électronique à balayage des gonopodes et des pattes, ainsi des microphotographies du genre fortement apparenté Serbosoma Ćurčić et Makarov, 2000. La partie centrale des gonopodes antérieurs de ces genres peut être spécifique et servir à l'identification initiale des espèces. Les Anthroleucosomatidae habitent trois régions distinctes du globe, une sur la côte ouest de l'Amérique du Nord, la seconde en Asie et la troisième en Europe. La faune nord-américaine des Anthroleucosomatidae comprend un seul genre monotypique, alors que la faune asiatique contient six genres et sept espèces et celle d'Europe, beaucoup plus diversifiée, inclut 14 genres et 39 espèces.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 139 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 478 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ćurčić, B.P.M., and Makarov, S.E. 2000. A revision of some species of Bulgarosoma Verhoeff (Anthroleucosomatidae, Myriapoda) from the Balkan Peninsula. Archives of Biological Sciences, 52: 173–178.Google Scholar
Golovatch, S., and Wytwer, J. 2003. A new genus and species of the millipede family Altajellidae from eastern Kazakhstan, Central Asia (Diplopoda: Chordeumatida). Annales Zoologici (Warsaw), 53: 579–584.Google Scholar
Guéroguiev, V.B. 1977. La faune troglobie terrestre de la péninsule Balkanique. Origine, formation et zoogéographie. Editions de L'Academie Bulgare des Sciences, Sofia.Google Scholar
Gulička, J. 1967. Neue und interessante Diplopoden aus Bulgarien. Annotationes Zoologicae et Botanicae, 39: 1–9.Google Scholar
Hadži, J. 1931. Zoogeografska karta kraljevine Jugoslavije. Zbirka karata geografskog društva, Belgrade.Google Scholar
Hoffman, R.L. 1979. Classification of the Diplopoda. Muséum d'Histoire naturelle, Geneva.Google Scholar
Makarov, S.E., Mitić, B.M., and Ćurčić, S.B. 2003. Svarogosoma bozidarcurcici n. g., n. sp., (Diplopoda, Anthroleucosomatidae) from the Balkan Peninsula, with notes on its phylogeny. Periodicum Biologorum, 105: 465–472.Google Scholar
Mršić, N. 1991. Monograph on earthworms (Lumbricidae) of the Balkans I. Academia Scientiarum et Arttium Slovenica, Classis IV: Historia Naturalis, Opera, 31: 1–355.Google Scholar
Spelda, J. 2001. Review of the millipede genus Pterygophorosoma Verhoeff, 1897 (Diplopoda, Chordeumatida, Craspedosomatidae). Andrias, 15: 29–48.Google Scholar
Shear, W.A. 1988. Systematic position of the milliped species Alloiopus solitarius Attems and the genus Ghilarovia Gulička (Chordeumatida, Anthroleucosomatidae). Myriapodologica, 2(8): 51–58.Google Scholar
Shear, W.A. 2000. On the millipede family Heterochordeumatidae, with comments on the higher classification of the order Chordeumatida (Diplopoda). Invertebrate Taxonomy, 14: 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shear, W.A., and Leonard, W.P. 2004. The millipede family Anthroleucosomatidae, new to North America: Leschius mcallisteri, n. gen., n. sp. (Diplopoda: Chordeumatida: Anthroleucosomatoidea). Zootaxa, 609: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strasser, K. 1960. Diplopoden aus Alpen-, Apenninen- und Balkanländern. Fragmenta Entomologica, 3: 95–140.Google Scholar
Strasser, K. 1966. Über Diplopoden Bulgariens. Annales Zoologici (Warsaw), 23(12): 1–61.Google Scholar
Tabacaru, I. 1967. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der cavernicolen Antroleucosomiden (Diplopoda, Ascospermophora). International Journal of Speleology, 3: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabacaru, I., and Giurginca, A. 2007. Bulgardicus bucarestensis n. sp. with a note on the family Anthroleucosomatidae (Diplopoda, Craspedosomatida). Travaux de l'Institut de Spéologie. In press.Google Scholar
Verhoeff, K.W. 1926. Über einige von Dr. I. Buresch in Bulgarien gesammelte Diplopoden. I. Arbeiten der Bulgarischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, 12: 66–79.Google Scholar