Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:46:21.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A GENERIC REVISION OF THE LACHNEIDÆ (LASIOCAMPIDÆ)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Harrison G. Dyar
Affiliation:
Washington, D. C.

Extract

The genera of the same regions are included in the present paper as in a former one on Hypogymnidæ (Can. Ent., XXIX., 12). The palæarctic Lachneids of the old world have been admirably treated by Aurivillius (Iris, Dresden, vii., 121–185), and I am indebted to his work for valuable information, as well as to the works of Kirby and Hampson. In going over the literature I did not always confirm Kirby's types of the genera; but rather than disturb the matter again, I have accepted them as modified by Aurivillius; but with the restoration of Hübner's Tentamen names, I drop Gastropacha, as it is a synonym of Lasiocampa, being proposed in the same sense to include all the species of the family. Following Wallengren, I separate catax and rimicola from Eriogaster as defined by Aurivillius for convenience in the table, though I do not doubt that the venation is as variable as Aurivillius states (Iris, vii., 147). I cannot separate the new genus Paralebeda, Auriv., from Odonestis by anything that is stated.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1898

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* This name should not be confounded with Trichura, Hubn., a genus of the Euchromiidæ.

Kirby (page 813) and Aurivillius are entirely at variance as to the type of this genus. I follow the latter author; not having seen the original work.

Staudingeria is preoccupied in the Pyralidæ.