Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:08:36.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genera and Subgenera of the Lygus Complex (Hemiptera: Miridae)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Leonard A. Kelton
Leonard A. Kelton
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology Unit, Entomology Division, Ottawa, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The classification of species of the Lygus complex has been somewhat unsatisfactory. Many species were assigned to the genus Lygus solely on the basis of superficial characters and many were transferred from one species group to another on the same inadequate basis. In the present paper the characters of the genera and subgenera of the complex are defined.

Study of structures of the internal male and female genitalia revealed characters of considerable taxonomic value. These, taken in conjunction with external taxonomic characters, enable the species of the complex to be classified into 14 genera or subgenera. Among other things, the investigation showed that the economically important “lygus” bugs are not of the genus Lygus Hahn, but of the genus Liocoris Fieber.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 87 , Issue 7 , July 1955 , pp. 277 - 301
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1955

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bonhag, P. F., and Wick, J. R., 1953. The functional anatomy of the male and female reproductive systems of the milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas) (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). J. Morph. 93: 177–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1952a. Neotropical Miridae: 50. On the present generic assignment of the species in the Biologia Centralia Americana (Hemiptera). Rio de Janeiro Mus. nac. Zool. Bol. 118: 1–17.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J. C. M. 1952b. On the major classification of the Miridae (Hemiptera) (With keys to subfamilies and tribes and a catalogue of the world genera). Ann. Acad. Brasil Ci., Rio de Janeiro. 24: 31–110.Google Scholar
China, W. E. 1941. A new subgeneric name for Lygus Reuter 1875, nee Hahn 1833 (Hemipt. Heteropt.). Proc. Roy. Ent. Soc. London, Ser. B, 10: 60.Google Scholar
Davis, N. T. 1952. Morphology of the female organs of reproduction in the Miridae (Hemiptera). M. Sc. thesis. Iowa State College.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1884. Insecta. Rhynchota. Hemiptera—Heteroptera. In Biologia Centrali Americana, 1: 1–302.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1904a. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Rhynchota. Vol. II. Heteroptera, second part. Taylor and Francis, London.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1904b. Rhynchotal notes. XXI. Heteroptera. Fam. Capsidae (Part II). Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 13: 194–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1909a. Descriptions of Oriental Capsidae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 4: 440–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1909b. Descriptions of Oriental Capsidae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 4: 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1910. Descriptions of Oriental Capsidae. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 5: 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fieber, F. X. 1858. Criterien zur generischen Theilung der Phytocoriden (Capsini auct.). Wiener Ent. Monat. 2: 289–347Google Scholar
Hahn, C. W. 1833. Die wanzenartigen Insecten. Nürnberg, (pp. 147–158).Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1917. A revision of the genus Lygus as it occurs in America north of Mexico, with biological data on the species from New York. New York (Cornell) Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 391: 555–645.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H.The plant bugs, or Miridae, of Illinois. Illinois Nat. Hist. Survey Bull. 22: 1–234.Google Scholar
Knight, H. H. 1953. New species of Miridae, from Missouri (Hemiptera). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 27: 509–518.Google Scholar
Kullenberg, B. 1947a. Uber Morphologie and Funktion des Kopulations — apparatus der Capsiden und Nabiden. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 24: 218–418.Google Scholar
Kullenberg, B. 1947b. Der Kopulationsapparat der Insekten aus phylogenetischen Gesicktspunkt. Zool. Bidr. Uppsala 25: 79–90.Google Scholar
Leston, D. 1952. On certain subgenera of Lygus Hahn 1833 (Hem., Miridae), with a review of the British species. Ent. Gaz. 3: 213–230.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1875. Revisio critica Capsinarum praecipue Scandinaviae et Fenniae. Akad. afhandl. Helsingfors 1: 1–101.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1892. Voyage de M. E. Simon au Venezuela (Dec. 1887—Apr. 1888) Hemiptera-Heteroptera. Ann. Soc. Ent. France 61: 392–402.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1905. Ad cognitionem Capsidarum aethiopicarum III. Ofvers. Finska vet. Soc. Forhandl. 47: 1–9.Google Scholar
Slater, J. A. 1950. An investigation of the female genitalia as taxonomie characters in the Miridae (Hemiptera). Iowa State Coll. J. Sci. 25: 1–81.Google Scholar
Taylor, T. H. C. 1947. Some East African species of Lygus, with notes on their host plants. Bull. Ent. Res. 38: 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, E. 1949a. Zur Systematik der Gattung Lygus Hhn. (Hem. Het. Miridae), Verb. Ver. naturw. Heimatf. Hamburg 30: 26–40.Google Scholar
Wagner, E. 1941. Reihenuntersuchungen bie der Untergattung Exolygus E. Wagn. (Hem. Het. Miridae). Mitt naturw. Ver. Steiermark 77–78: 1–6.Google Scholar
Wagner, E., and Slater, J. A.. 1952. Concerning some Holarctic Miridae (Hemiptera, Heteroptera). Proc. Ent. Soc. Washington 54: 273–281.Google Scholar