Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:18:34.845Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field Studies on Flight Patterns and Olfactory Responses of Ambrosia Beetles in Douglas-fir Forests of Western Oregon1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. A. Rudinsky  and
G. E. Daterman
J. A. Rudinsky
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis
G. E. Daterman
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flight of the ambrosia beetles, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.), Gnathotrichus sulcatus Lec. and G. retusus Lec., revealed distinct diurnal and seasonal patterns that were influenced by environmental factors, particularly temperature, wind, and daylight. While Trypodendron flies during the entire day when the temperature is favorable, the Gnathotrichus species exhibit a peak of flight at dusk. The temperature thresholds of emergence and initiation of flight for Trypodendron and the threshold for flight of Gnathotrichus were established.

The substance responsible for mass attraction of Trypodendron, after the initial invasion of a few pioneer beetles, was found to be a species-specific sex pheromone produced by sexually mature females after entering the host. The pheromone has been concentrated from the female borings in the laboratory, and when released in the field it caused the beetles to respond. Both species of Gnathotrichus, on the other hand, responded to the borings produced by female beetles of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins and to the extract prepared in alcohol. This fact suggests possible use of these substances in control of these ambrosia beetles.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 96 , Issue 10 , October 1964 , pp. 1339 - 1352
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batra, L. R. 1963. Ecology of ambrosia fungi and their dissemination by beetles. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 66: 213–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. 1962. Nahrungsfindung und Chemotaxien bei holzbewohnenden Kafern. Z. angew. Ent. 50: 88–93.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1962. Field studies on attack flight and log selection by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) (Coleoptera; Scolytidae). Canad. Ent. 94: 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1963. Field selection of different log odors by scolytid beetles. Canad. Ent. 95: 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A., and Kinghorn, J. M.. 1958. Studies of flight and attack activity of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.), and other scolytids. Canad. Ent. 90: 362–372.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S., and Gunn, D. L.. 1961. The orientation of animals. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Gara, R. I., and Vité, J. P.. 1962. Studies on the flight patterns of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in second growth ponderosa pine forests. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 275–289.Google Scholar
Graham, K. 1959. Release by flight exercise of a chemotropic response from photopositive domination in a scolytid beetle. Nature, Lond. 184: 283–284.Google Scholar
Graham, K., and Boyes, E. C.. 1950. Pinworms in lumber. Historical and economic aspects. B.C. Lumberman 34: 42, 106.Google Scholar
Graham, K., and Werner, A. E.. 1956. Chemical aspects of log selection by ambrosia beetles. Bi-m. Progr. Rep. Can. Dep. Agric., For. Biol. Div. 12: 3–4.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. E. 1958a. Field identification of ambrosia beetles attacking coniferous timber in the Douglas-fir region. Canad. Ent. 90: 236–240.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. E. 1958b. Ambrosia beetle infestation of coniferous logs on clearcuttings in northwestern Oregon. J. For. 56: 508–511.Google Scholar
McMullen, D. L. 1956. Ambrosia beetles and their control in British Columbia. For. Chron. 32: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novák, V. 1960. Dřevokaz čárkovaný a boj proti němu. (Trypodendron lineatum, its bionomy and control.) Stát. Zeměd. Nakl., Prague, Lesn. Aktuality 1, 132 pp.Google Scholar
Novák, V. 1962. Einige neue Erkentnisse uber die Bionomie des gemeinen Nutzholzborkenkafers Trypodendron lineatum Oliv. und ihre Anwendung in der Forst- und Holzwirtschaft. Verh. Xl int. Kongr. Ent., Vienna (1960) 2: 266–269.Google Scholar
Novák, V. 1963. Populační hustota zimujícíh imag dřevokaza čárkovaného Trypodendron lineatum Ol. na skladech a v lesních porostech. (Population density of overwintering T. lineatum in cold decks and in forest stands.) Práce výzk. ústavů lesn. CSSR 27: 7–63.Google Scholar
Prebble, M. L., and Graham, K.. 1957. Studies of attack by ambrosia beetles in softwood logs on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. For. Sci. 3: 90–112.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1963. Response of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins to volatile attractants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 23–38.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 251–273.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I. and Cramer, H. H.. Field observations on the response of bark beetles infesting southern pines to attractants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. (in press).Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I. and Kliefoth, R. A.. 1963. Collection and bioassay of a volatile fraction attractive to Ips confusus (Lec.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 39–50.Google Scholar