Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:08:45.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The extinct genus Pareuthychaeta in Eocene ambers (Diptera: Schizophora: Ephydroidea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2012

David Grimaldi  and
Hukam Singh
David Grimaldi*
Affiliation:
Entomology, Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York 10024-5192, United States of America
Hukam Singh
Affiliation:
Birbal Sahni Institute for Palaeobotany, 53 University Road, Lucknow 226007, India
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pareuthychaeta Hennig was previously known only from two described species in Eocene Baltic amber (Lutetian, ca. 42 Ma), Pareuthychaeta electrica Hennig and Pareuthychaeta minuta (Meunier), some details of which are revised based on new specimens. A third Baltic species is described, Pareuthychaeta mcalpinei Grimaldi, sp. nov. Another species, Pareuthychaeta eoindica Grimaldi, sp. nov., is described in earliest Eocene (Ypresian-aged, ca. 50–52 Ma) amber from Gujarat, western India. Comments are provided on the relationships of Pareuthychaeta to Recent genera of Diastatidae sensu lato (including Campichoetinae), and implications of this extinct genus are discussed regarding biogeography and the early Paleogene Schizophora radiations.

Résumé

Pareuthychaeta Hennig n'est connu que pour ses deux espèces décrites dans l'ambre baltique de l’Éocène (Lutétien, environ 42 Ma), Pareuthychaeta electrica Hennig et Pareuthychaeta minuta (Meunier), dont certains détails sont présentement révisés à l'aide de nouveaux spécimens. Une troisième espèce baltique est décrite, Pareuthychaeta mcalpinei Grimaldi, sp. nov. Une autre espèce, Pareuthychaeta eoindica Grimaldi, sp. nov., est décrite dans l'ambre datant de l’Éocène le plus ancien (Yprésian, environ 50–52 Ma), et provenant de Gujarat, Inde de l'Ouest. Des commentaires sont fournis quant aux relations de Pareuthychaeta avec les genres actuels de Diastatidae sensu lato (Campichoetinae inclue), et les implications de ce genre éteint, en lien avec la biogeographie et la radiation des Schizophora du Paléogène inférieur, sont discutées.

Type
Original Article
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 144 , Issue 1 , 23 February 2012 , pp. 17 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barraclough, D.A. 1992. A synopsis of the Afrotropical Diastatidae (Diptera), with the description of five new species from southern and east Africa and first record of the Campichoetinae. Annals of the Natal Museum, 33: 13–36.Google Scholar
Chandler, P.J. 1987. The families Diastatidae and Campichoetidae (Diptera, Drosophiloidea) with a revision of Palaearctic and Nepalese species of Diastata Meigen. Entomologica Scandinavica, 18: 1–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duda, O. 1934. Diastatidae. In Die Fliegen der Palaearktischen Region, vol. 81, Fascicle 58e. Edited by E. Lindner E. Schweizerbart'sche, Stuttgart. pp. 1–18, +2 plates.Google Scholar
Griffiths, G.C.D. 1972. The phylogenetic classification of Diptera Cyclorrhapha with special reference to the structure of the male postabdomen. Series Entomologica, 8(8), 1–341, The Hague.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D.A. 1990. A phylogenetic, revised classification of genera in the Drosophilidae. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 197: 1–139.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D.A. 2008. A stalk-eyed ephydroid fly from the Eocene (Diptera: Ephydroidea: Camillidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 110: 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, D.A., Cumming, J. 1999. Brachyceran Diptera in Cretaceous ambers and Mesozoic diversification of the Eremoneura. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 239: 1–124.Google Scholar
Grimaldi, D.A., Engel, M.S. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 755 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1965. Die Acalyptratae des Baltischen Bernsteins und ihre Bedeutung für die Erforschung der phylogenetischen Entwicklung dieser Dipteren-Gruppe. Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, 145: 1–215.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1967. Neue Acalyptratae aus dem Baltischen Bernstein bekannten Acalyptratae (Diptera: Cyclorrhapha). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, 175: 1–27.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1969. Neue Übersicht über die aus dem Baltischen Bernstein bekannten Acalyptratae (Diptera, Cyclorrhapha). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde, 209: 1–42.Google Scholar
Kotrba, M. 2006. The internal female reproductive tract of Campichoeta Macquart, 1835 and Diastata Meigen, 1830 (Diptera, Schizophora). Studia Dipterologica, 13: 309–315.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1962. A revision of the genus Campichoeta Macquart (Diptera: Diastatidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 94: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1981. Morphology and terminology – Adults. In Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol. 1. Coordinated by J.F. McAlpine, B.V. Peterson, G.E. Shewell, H.J. Teskey, J.R. Vockeroth and D.M. Wood. Agriculture Canada Monograph 27. Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Ottawa. pp. 9–64.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F. 1989. Phylogeny and classification of the Muscomorpha. In Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol. 3. Coordinated by J.F. McAlpine and D.M. Wood. Agriculture Canada Monograph 32. Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Ottawa. pp. 1397–1518.Google Scholar
Meunier, M.F. 1904. Contribution à la faune des Helomyzinae de l'ambre de la Baltique. Feuille des Naturalists, 35: 21–27.Google Scholar
Nascimbene, P.C., Silverstein, H. 2000. The preparation of fragile Cretaceous ambers for conservation and study of organismal inclusions. In Studies on fossils in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey. Edited by D. Grimaldi. Backhuys, Leiden. pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
Ritzkowski, S. 1997. K-Ar-Altersbestimmungen der bernsteinfuehrenden Sedimente des Samlandes (Palaeogen), Bezirk Kaliningrad. Metalla (Sonderheft), 66: 19–23.Google Scholar
Rust, J., Singh, H., Rana, R.S., McCann, T., Singh, L., Anderson, K., et al. 2010. Biogeographic and evolutionary implications of a diverse paleobiota in amber from the early Eocene of India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States of America, 107: 18360–18365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Tschirnaus, M., Hoffeins, C. 2009. Fossil flies in Baltic amber – insights in the diversity of Tertiary Acalyptratae (Diptera, Schizophora), with new morphological characters and a key based on 1,000 collected inclusions. Denisia, 26: 171–212.Google Scholar
Wiegmann, B.M., Trautwein, M.D., Winkler, I.S., Barr, N.B., Kim, J.-W., Lambkin, C., Bertone, M.A., et al. 2011. The fly tree of life: multiple lines of evidence reveal phylogenetic history in the insect order Diptera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, United States of America. In press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, A.P., Tappert, R., Muehlenbachs, K., Boudreau, M., McKellar, R.C., Basinger, J.F., et al. 2009. A new proposal concerning the botanical origin of Baltic amber. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 276: 3403–3412.Google Scholar