Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:10:30.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESTIMATION OF COCCINELLID NUMBERS AND MOVEMENT IN THE FIELD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. M. Ives
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1W5

Abstract

Changes in the numbers of adults of Coccinella californica Mannerheim and C. trifasciata Mulsant in small plots of alfalfa and oats were monitored over the summers of 1974 and 1975 by mark–recapture methods. Aphid population dynamics in the plots were studied concurrently. In the second summer, movements of the beetles were also monitored by means of individual marking and sticky net traps. Approximately 1000 beetles of each species were marked in the first summer; in the second, roughly 5000 and 3000 respectively. The capture–recapture method was tested with a caged population, and was found to be feasible for estimation of the coccinellid numbers. Catch per unit effort, using visual sampling that was not dependent on marking, provided an acceptable index of numbers which could give population estimates when calibrated against mark–recapture estimates.

The number of beetles trapped on the sticky nets was primarily a function of numbers in the plots and temperature, with the two species having different relationships between temperature and flight. But for C. californica, the numbers trapped were also a function of aphid density in the plots; the data suggested that for C. trifasciata the same is probably true, but the range of densities of pea aphids was too narrow to show it. In both seasons, C. trifasciata was predominant in the alfalfa and C. californica in the oats. Plot to plot movements by overwintered beetles reflected the same apparent preference. Changes in the numbers of coccinellids in the experimental plots, and their reproductive success, are discussed in the light of these findings.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carothers, A. D. 1973. Capture-recapture methods applied to a population with known parameters. J. Anim. Ecol. 42: 125146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, B. D. and Gilbert, N.. 1976. Coccinellids and aphids: a quantitative study of the impact of adult ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on field populations of pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 73: 3356.Google Scholar
Free, C. A., Beddington, J. R., and Lawton, J. H.. 1977. On the inadequacy of simple models of mutual interference for parasitism and predation. J. Anim. Ecol. 46: 543554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P., Lawton, J. H., and Beddington, J. R.. 1976. The components of arthropod predation. I. The prey death rate. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 135164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodek, I. 1973. Biology of the Coccinellidae. Junk, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, G. M. 1965. Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration — stochastic model. Biometrika 52: 225247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kieckhefer, R. W. and Olson, G. A.. 1974. Dispersal of marked coccinellids from crops in South Dakota. J. econ. Ent. 67: 5254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W. W. 1969. Switching in general predators: experiments on predator specificity and stability of prey populations. Ecol. Monogr. 39: 335354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W. W. and Marks, J. R.. 1973. Predation by coccinellid beetles: experiments on switching. Ecology 54: 160167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roff, D. A. 1973. On the accuracy of some mark-recapture-estimators. Oecologia 12: 1534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siniff, D. B., De Master, D. P., Hofman, R. J., and Eberhardt, L. L.. 1977. An analysis of the dynamics of a Weddell Seal population. Ecol. Monogr. 47: 319335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, G. and Weeks, R. E.. 1973. The impact of predators on populations of green peach aphids on field-grown sugarbeets. Environ. Ent. 2: 345349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar