Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:45:26.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EMERGENCE BEHAVIOUR, SEX RATIOS, AND THE TIMING OF ECLOSION IN PARAPEDIASIA TETERRELLA (LEPIDOPTERA: PYRALIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Larry D. Marshall
Larry D. Marshall
Affiliation:
Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Box 2000, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada K0J 1J0
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parapediasia teterrella Bleszynski adults eclose in New Mexico during the months of June, July, and August. Nightly emergence occurred within 40 min and this time period became earlier in the scotophase as the season progressed, particularly during July. The timing of this period does not seem to be related to either temperature or photoperiod.

Though males emerged before females on each night, sex ratios of emerging moths were consistently 1:1. Following a short sedentary period while their wings dried, the moths left the emergence site.

Résumé

Les adultes du papillon nocturne Parapediasia teterrella Bleszynski sont presents au Nouveau Mexique en juin, juillet et août. L’éclosion journalière a lieu à l’intérieur d’une periode de 40 min et cette periode avance dans le temps avec le progres de la saison (surtout en juillet). Cette avance ne paraît pas être associée avec la température ou la photopériode.

Bien qui à chaque nuit les mâles émergent un peu avant les femelles, les rapport des sexe sont toujour de 1 : 1. A la suite à une courte période sédentaire pendant lequelle leurs ailes sèchent, les papillons quittent leur site à éclosion.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 4 , August 1994 , pp. 925 - 928
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainslie, G.G. 1930. The Bluegrass Webworm. USDA Technical Bulletin 173: 25 pp.Google Scholar
Banerjee, A.C., and Decker, G.C.. 1966. Studies on sod webworms. I. Eclosion rhythm, mating, and oviposition behaviour under natural conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology 59: 1237–1244.Google Scholar
Crawford, C.S. 1968. Oviposition rhythm in Crambus teterrellus: Temperature-depression effects and apparent circadian periodicity. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60: 1014–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, C.S. 1971. Comparative reproduction of Crambus harpipterus and Agriphila plumbifimbriella in northern New Mexico. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 64: 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, J.A. 1974. Eclosion rhythm in Chrysoteuchia topiaria. Environmental Entomology 3: 380–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, L.D. 1986. Mating System Biology of Agriphila plumbifimbriella and Parapediasia teterrella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM. 125 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, L.D. 1988. Small male advantage in mating in Parapediasia teterrella and Agriphila plumbifimbriella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). American Midland Naturalist 119: 412–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, C., and Fagerstrom, T.. 1977. Why do males eclose before females? A hypothesis to explain the incidence of protandry in butterflies. Oecologia 31: 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J.R. 1963. The reproduction and fecundity of the sugar cane stalk borer, Proceras Bojer (Lepidoptera, Crambidae). pp. 611–625in Williams, J.R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th Congress of the I.S.S.C.T. Elsevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar