Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:00:56.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ELETROPHORETIC CHARACTERIZATIONS OF BLACK FLIES IN THE SIMULIUM VENUSTUM AND VERECUNDUM SPECIES COMPLEXES (DIPTERA: SIMULIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

T. P. Snyder
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan 49931

Abstract

Electrophoretic characterizations of sibling species in the Simulium venustum–verecundum complexes are presented based on nine enzymatic loci. Simulium verecundum s.l. is easily separable from S. venustum s.l. by unique complements of electromorphs for lactate dehydrogenase. Quantitative and minor qualitative differences also exist between most pairs of sibling species within S. venustum and S. verecundum. Not all pairs are separable using the nine enzymatic loci scored in this study. This close genetic affinity of species pairs that are not separable by electrophoretic methods parallels their chromosomal and ecological affinity.

Résumé

La caractérisation électrophorétique d'espèces jumelles des complexes Simulium venustum–verecundum a été effectuée en utilisant 9 loci enzymatiques. Simulium verecundum s.l. est facilement separable de S. venustum s.l. par des profiles uniques d'électromorphes pour la dehydrogenase lactique. Des différences quantitatives et qualitatives mineures existent aussi entre la plupart des paires d'espèces jumelles chez S. venustum et S. verecundum. Il est impossible de séparer toutes les paires sur la base des neuf loci enzymatiques examinés dans cette étude. Cette affinité génétique étroite pour les paires d'espèces inséparables par les méthodes électrophorétiques est similaire à leur affinité chromosomique et écologique.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayala, F. J. and Powell, J. R.. 1972. Allozymes as diagnostic characters of sibling species of Drosophila. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69: 10941096.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J., Powell, J. R., Tracey, M. L., Mourao, C. A., and Perez-Salas, S.. 1972. Enzyme variability in the Drosophila willistoni group. IV. Genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila willistoni. Genetics 70: 113139.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. J., Tracey, M. L., Hedgecock, D., and Richmond, R. C.. 1974. Genetic differentiation during the speciation process in Drosophila. Evolution 28: 576592.Google Scholar
May, B., Bauer, L. S., Vadas, R. L., and Granett, J.. 1977. Biochemical genetic variation in the family Simuliidae: Electrophoretic identification of the human biter in the isomorphic Simulium jenningsi group. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 70: 637640.Google Scholar
Rothfels, K. 1978. Cytotaxonomy of black flies (Simuliidae). A. Rev. Ent. 24: 507539.Google Scholar
Rothfels, K., Feraday, R., and Kaneps, A.. 1978. A cytological description of sibling species of Simulium venustum and S. verecundum with standard maps for the subgenus Simulium Davies (Diptera). Can. J. Zool. 56: 11101128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selander, R. K., Smith, M. H., Yang, S. Y., Johnson, W. E., and Gentry, J. B.. 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics VI. Univ. Texas Publs 7103: 4990.Google Scholar