Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:11:12.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electroantennogram, behavioural responses, and field trapping of Trypophloeus klimeschi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to eight host volatiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Guanqun Gao ,
Lulu Dai ,
Jing Gao ,
Jiaxing Wang  and
Hui Chen
Guanqun Gao
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources (South China Agricultural University), Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
Lulu Dai
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
Jing Gao
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
Jiaxing Wang
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, No. 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China
Hui Chen*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources (South China Agricultural University), Guangdong Key Laboratory for Innovative Development and Utilization of Forest Plant Germplasm, College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trypophloeus klimeschi Eggers (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) was first discovered in China in 2003, and it exhibits strong species specificity to Populus alba var. pyramidalis Bunge (Salicaceae). To screen plant volatile compounds for monitoring and trapping T. klimeschi, the electroantennogram responses of adult T. klimeschi to eight plant volatiles, including nonanal, 2-methylbutanal, decanal, 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol benzoate, methyl benzoate, methyl salicylate, and geraniol were tested at various concentrations. Behavioural responses of female and male adults to various concentrations of these eight plant volatiles were also determined using a Y-tube olfactometer. We then tested the effectiveness of these compounds as lures for trapping T. klimeschi in the field. Electroantennogram tests showed that T. klimeschi possesses olfactory sensitivity for eight compounds. Additionally, walking T. klimeschi exhibited attraction to low concentrations (≤ 1 μg/μL) of all eight compounds in Y-tube olfactometer. Field experiment results indicated that baits composed of each volatile compound alone were more attractive to greater numbers of T. klimeschi than the control. The methyl benzoate bait was better attracted by T. klimeschi than other tested volatiles. These results suggest that these compounds could be used in attraction of this stem-boring pest. This study could have important implications for the development of an effective semiochemical-based management tool for T. klimeschi in the field.

Type
Insect Management
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 151 , Issue 2 , April 2019 , pp. 236 - 250
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Barbara Bentz

References

Barbosa, P. 1975. Manual of basic techniques in insect histology. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 21: 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blande, J.D., Korjus, M., and Holopainen, J.K. 2010. Foliar methyl salicylate emissions indicate prolonged aphid infestation on silver birch and black alder. Tree Physiology, 30: 404–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borden, J.H., Chong, L.J., Savoie, A., and Wilson, I.M. 1997. Responses to green leaf volatiles in two biogeoclimatic zones by striped ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 23: 2479–2491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J.H., Wilson, I.M., Gries, R., Chong, L.J., Pierce, H.D., and Gries, G. 1998. Volatiles from the bark of trembling aspen, Populus tremuloides Michx (Salicaceae) disrupt secondary attraction by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology, 8: 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, T.J., Wadhams, L.J., and Woodcock, C.M. 2005. Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends Plant Science, 10: 269–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, Y., Luo, Z.B., Wang, S.S., and Zhang, P., 2004. Bionomics and control of Trypophloeus klimeschi. Entomological Knowledge, 41: 76–79.Google Scholar
Chen, H. 2003. The regulation role of semiochemicals in the host selection and colonization of bark beetles. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 39: 154–158.Google Scholar
Chen, Z.C., Su, L., Ge, F., and Su, J.W. 2010. Electroantennogram responses of the green leaf bug Lygus lucorum Meyer Dür (Hemiptera: Miridae), to sex pheromone analogs and plant volatiles. Acta Entomological Sinica, 53: 47–54.Google Scholar
Delorme, J.D. and Payne, T.L. 1990. Antennal olfactory responses of black turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus terebrans (Olivier), to bark beetle pheromones and host terpenes. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16: 1321–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, J.Y., Huang, Y.P., Wei, H.Y., and Du, J.W. 2004. EAG and behavioral responses of Helicoverpa armigera males to volatiles from poplar leaves and their combinations with sex pheromone. Journal of Zhejiang University Science, 5: 1577–1582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickens, J.C. 2015. Orientation of Colorado potato beetle to natural and synthetic blends of volatiles emitted by potato plants. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2: 167–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, J.C. and Payne, T.L. 1977. Bark beetle olfaction: pheromone receptor system in Dendroctonus frontalis. Journal of Insect Physiology, 23: 481–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, J.C., Payne, T.L., Ryker, L.C., and Rudinsky, J.A. 1985. Multiple acceptors for pheromonal enantiomers on single olfactory cells in the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 11: 1359–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, V.O.H. 1915. Trypophloeus klimeschi nov. spec. Entomologische Blatter, 25: 7–9.Google Scholar
Erbilgin, N., Mori, S.R., Sun, J.H., Stein, J.D., Owen, D.R., Merrill, L.D., et al. 2007. Response to host volatiles by native and introduced populations of Dendroctonus valens (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in North America and China. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33: 131–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gao, G., Dai, L., Gao, J., Wang, J., and Chen, H. 2018a. Volatile organic compound analysis of host and non-host poplars for Trypophloeus klimeschi (Coleoptera:Curculionidae: Ipinae). Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 65: 916–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, G., Gao, J., Hao, C., Dai, L., and Chen, H. 2018b. Biodiversity and activity of gut fungal communities across the life history of Trypophloeus klimeschi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). International Journal of Molecular Science, 19: 2010–2040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germinara, G.S., Cristofaro, A.D., and Rotundo, G. 2009. Antennal olfactory responses to individual cereal volatiles in Theocolax elegans (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 45: 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, C.A., Runyon, J.B., Jenkins, M.J., and Giunta, A.D. 2015: Mountain pine beetles use volatile cues to locate host limber pine and avoid non-host Great Basin bristlecone pine. Public Library of Science One, 10: e0135752.Google ScholarPubMed
Hatano, E., Kunert, G.M.J.P., and Weisser, W.W. 2008. Chemical cues mediating aphid location by natural enemies. European Journal of Entomology, 105: 797–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, D.P.W. and Borden, J.H. 2003. Comparative behavioural responses of Dryocoetes confusus Swaine, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby), and Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to angiosperm tree bark volatiles. Environmental Entomology, 32: 742–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, D.G. and Grasswitz, T.R. 2005. Synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles increase field captures of parasitic wasps. Biocontrol, 50: 871–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, D.M., Kamm, J.A., and Buttery, R.G. 1992. Electroantennogram response of alfalfa seed chalcid, Bruchophagus roddi (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) to host- and nonhost-plant volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 18: 333–352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindgren, B.S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). The Canadian Entomologist, 115: 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miao, Z.W., Zhang, Z.N., Wang, P.X., Guo, Y.Y., and Sun, J.H. 2004. Response of the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to host semiochemicals and its implication in management. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 47: 360–364.Google Scholar
Payne, T.L. 1975. Bark beetle olfaction. iii. Antennal olfactory responsiveness of Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmerman and Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to aggregation pheromones and host tree terpene hydrocarbons. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1: 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, T.L., Andryszak, N.A., Wieser, H., Dixon, E.A., Ibrahim, N., and Coers, J. 1988. Antennnal olfactory and behavioral response of southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis, to analogs of its aggregation pheromone frontalin. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 14: 12–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitman, G.B., Vité, J.P., Kinzer, G.W., and Fentiman, A.F. 1969. Specificity of population-aggregating pheromones in Dendroctonus. Journal of Insect Physiology, 15: 363–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, T.W., Campbell, C.A., Hardie, J., and Wadhams, L.J. 2004. Electroantennogram responses of the three migratory forms of the damson-hop aphid, Phorodon humuli, to aphid pheromones and plant volatiles. Journal of Insect Physiology, 50: 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlyter, F., Löfqvist, J., and Jakus, R. 1994. Green leaf volatiles and verbenone modify attraction of European Tomicus, Hylurgops, and Ips bark beetles. Behavior Population Dynamics and Control of Forest Insects, 10: 29–44.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. 1987. Plant recognition by insects: a challenge for neuro-ethological research. Series Entomological, 20: 117–123.Google Scholar
Sen, A., Raina, R., Joseph, M., and Tungikar, V.B. 2005. Response of Trichogramma chilonis to infochemicals: an SEM and electrophysiological investigation. Biocontrol, 50: 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, W.P., Huber, D.P.W., Seybold, S.J., and Fettig, C.J. 2007. Antennal responses of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis, (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), to stem volatiles of its primary host, Pinus ponderosa, and nine sympatric nonhost angiosperms and conifers. Chemoecology, 17: 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, W.P. and Sullivan, B.T. 2013. Southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis, antennal and behavioral responses to nonhost leaf and bark volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 39: 481–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sui, X.L., Xu, Z.C., and Tian, C.M. 2012. Analysis of Prunus armeniaca volatiles and the electroantennogram responses induced by them in Scolytus rugulosus. Chinese Bulletin Entomology, 49: 76–79.Google Scholar
Visser, J.H. 1986. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 31: 121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, J.H. and Yan, F.S. 1995. Electroantennogram responses of the grain aphids Sitobion avenae (F.) and Metopolophium dirhodum (Walk.) (Hom., Aphididae) to plant odour components. Journal of Applied Entomology, 119: 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, A.T. 1986. Electroantennogram responses by mountain pine beetles, Dendroctonus ponderosae, Hopkins, exposed to selected semiochemicals. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 12: 1603–1621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, D. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annual Review of Entomology, 27: 411–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, H., Wang, H.W., Yang, W., and Yang, C.P. 2015. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Tomicus minor (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to host volatiles. Entomologica Fennica, 26: 15–24.Google Scholar
Yu, H., Zhang, Y., Wu, K., Gao, X.W., and Guo, Y.Y. 2008. Field-testing of synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects. Environmental Entomology, 37: 1410–1415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L., Chen, H., Ma, C., and Tian, Z. 2010. Electrophysiological responses of Dendroctonus armandi, (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) to volatiles of Chinese white pine as well as to pure enantiomers and racemates of some monoterpenes. Chemoecology, 20: 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q.H., Birgersson, G., Zhu, J., Löfstedt, C., Löfqvist, J., and Schlyter, F. 1999. Leaf volatiles from nonhost deciduous trees: variation by tree species, season and temperature, and electrophysiological activity in Ips typographus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25: 1923–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M., Dai, L., Sun, Y., Danyang, F. U., and Chen, H. 2017. The pheromone verbenone and its function in Dendroctonus armandi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). European Journal of Entomology, 114: 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, N., Guan, J., Ferrer, J.L., Engle, N., Chern, M.S., Ronald, P., et al. 2010. Biosynthesis and emission of insect-induced methyl salicylate and methyl benzoate from rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48: 279–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, J., Obrycki, J.J., Ochieng, S.A., Baker, T.C., Pickett, J.A., and Smiley, D. 2005. Attraction of two lacewing species to volatiles produced by host plants and aphid prey. Die Naturwissenschaften, 92: 277–281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: PDF

Gao et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Gao et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 86.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Gao et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Gao et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 91.3 KB