Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:12:22.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFICACY OF ESFENVALERATE FOR CONTROL OF INSECTS HARMFUL TO SEED PRODUCTION IN DISEASE-RESISTANT WESTERN WHITE PINES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

N.G. Rappaport
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, PO Box 245, Berkeley, California, USA 94701
M.I. Haverty
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, PO Box 245, Berkeley, California, USA 94701
P.J. Shea
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, PO Box 245, Berkeley, California, USA 94701
R.E. Sandquist
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Forest Pest Management, PO Box 3623, Portland, Oregon, USA 97208

Abstract

We tested the pyrethroid insecticide esfenvalerate in single, double, and triple applications for control of insects affecting seed production of blister rust-resistant western white pine, Pinus monticola Douglas. All treatments increased the proportion of normal seed produced and reduced the proportion of seed damaged by the western conifer seed bug, Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann. Only the triple application reduced the proportion of cones killed by the pine cone beetle, Conophthorus ponderosae Hopkins. Other seed-damaging insect species [seed chalcids, Megastigmus sp.; the fir coneworm, Dioryctria abietivorella (Grote); and seedworms, Cydia sp.] were present but in numbers too low to test for insecticide efficacy.

Résumé

On a constaté l’efficace de l’esfenvalérate avec des traitements simples, doubles, et triples contre les insectes nuisibles des cônes et graines de Pinus monticola Douglas amélioré de résistance contre la rouille. Tous les traitements ont augmenté la proportion des graines saines et tous les trois ont réduit la proportion de graines endommagées par la punaise à pattes feuilleuses, Leptoglossus occidentalis Heidemann. Uniquement le traitement triple a réduit la proportion des cônes tuée par le scolyte des cônes du pin, Conophthorus ponderosae Hopkins. Les autres espèces d’insectes nuisibles présentes à ce verger à graines [chalcidiens, Megastigmus sp.; la pyrale des cônes du sapin, Dioryctria abietivorella (Grote); et la pyrale des graines, Cydia sp.] ont été présentes aux niveaux trop bas d’essayer l’efficace de l’insecticide.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, Y.M.M., Fienberg, S.E., and Holland, P.W.. 1977. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London. 557 pp.Google Scholar
DeBarr, G.L., and Ebel, B.H.. 1973. How seedbugs reduce the quality and quantity of pine seed yields. Twelfth Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference Proceedings, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, June 1973. pp. 97103.Google Scholar
Haig, I.T., Davis, K.P., and Weidman, R.H.. 1941. Natural Regeneration in the Western White Pine Type. United Sates Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 767: 98 pp.Google Scholar
Haverty, M.I., and Shea, P.J.. 1986. Protection of blister rust-resistant western white pine cones from insect damage with permethrin and fenvalerate. pp. 246250in Shearer, R. (Compiler), United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report INT-203.Google Scholar
Haverty, M.I., Shea, P.J., and Stipe, L.E.. 1986. Single and multiple applications of fenvalerate to protect western white pine from Dioryctria abietivorella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 79: 158161.Google Scholar
Haverty, M.I., Shea, P.J., and Stipe, L.E. 1988. Protection of disease-resistant western white pine seed from insect damage. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 3: 1820.Google Scholar
Haverty, M.I., and Wood, J.R.. 1981. Residual toxicity of eleven insecticide formulations to the mounain pine cone beetle, Conophthorus monticolae Hopkins. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 16: 7783.Google Scholar
Shea, P.J. 1986. Impact of insects on cone/seed production in three blister rust-resistant western white pine seed orchards. pp. 256259in Shearer, R. (Compiler), United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report INT–203.Google Scholar
Shea, P.J., Haverty, M.I., and Daterman, G.E.. 1987. Impact of insects and methodology for monitoring insects in western white pine seed orchards. Proc. Cone and Seed Insect Working Party Conf. IUFRO, Briançon, France. pp. 147155. [Available from Centre de Recherches d'Orléans INRA, Station de Zoologie Forestière, ARDON 45160 Olivet, France.]Google Scholar
Shea, P.J., Jenkins, M.J., and Haverty, M.I.. 1984. Cones of blister rust-resistant western white pine protected from Conophthorus ponderosae Hopkins (= C. monticolae Hopkins). Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 19: 129138.Google Scholar
Shea, P.J., and Rappaport, N.G.. 1994. The insect complex and its impact on seed production of blister rust-resistant western white pine and sugar pine. Proceedings of the Cone and Seed Insect Symposium, XIX International Congress of Entomology, Beijing, China, June 30. 1992. pp. 8396. [Available from United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Southeastern Station, 320 Green Street, Athens, Georgia 30602.]Google Scholar
Sniezko, R. 1992. Western white pine and sugar pine cone crops at Dorena Tree Improvement Center. Proceedings of the Northwest Seed Orchard Managers Association 1991 Winter Workshop, Jan. 27–28, 1992, Wilsonville. Oregon. pp. 23. [Available from Daniels and Associates, Centralia, Washington 98531.]Google Scholar
Steele, R.G.D., and Torrie, J.H.. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, NY. 633 pp.Google Scholar