Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:11:32.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON DEVELOPMENTAL RATE AND FECUNDITY OF THE PEAR PSYLLA, PSYLLA PYRICOLA (HOMOPTERA: PSYLLIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. D. McMullen  and
C. Jong
R. D. McMullen
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Summerland, British Columbia
C. Jong
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Summerland, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At constant temperatures between 10.0° and 32.2°C with 16 h photoperiod development of eggs and nymphs was slowest at 10.0° (61.8 days av.) and most rapid at 26.7°C (27.0 days av.). Mortality of eggs and nymphs was moderate (43.7%) at 10.0°, least (24.2%) at 21.1°, and 100% at 32.2°C. Between 15.6° and 35.0°C, 16 h photoperiod, fecundity of winter form adults was greatest (486.3 eggs av) at 15.6° and lowest (0.0 eggs) at 35.0°C. For summer form adults fecundity was moderate (212.4 eggs av.) at 15.6°, maximum (444.9 and 447.3 eggs av., respectively) at 21.1° and 26.7°C, and least (2.8 eggs av.) at 35.0°C. Longevity of male and female winter and summer forms was greatest at the low temperature and least at the high temperature. These data are discussed with relation to field observations of natural pear psylla populations and control programs.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 2 , February 1977 , pp. 165 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrewartha, H. G. and Birch, L. C.. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. University of Chicago Press. 782 pp.Google Scholar
Burts, E. C. 1963. The pear psylla in central Washington. Agric. Exp. Stn Wash. St. Inst. agric. Sci. Circ. 416. 11 pp.Google Scholar
Burts, E. C. and Fischer, W. R.. 1967. Mating behavior, egg production, and egg fertility in the pear psylla. J. econ. Ent. 60: 1297–1300.Google Scholar
Georgala, M. B. 1957. A contribution to the biology of the pear sucker, Psylla pyricola Föer. Rep. E. Malling Res. Stn 1956: 134–141.Google Scholar
Madsen, H. F., Sisson, R. L., and Bethell, R. S.. 1962. The pear psylla in California. Calif. agric. Exp. Stn Circ. 510. 11 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, J. 1959. An unusual manifestation in the natural control of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerst. Proc. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 56: 69–71.Google Scholar
McMullen, R. D. and Jong, C.. 1972. Influence of temperature and host vigor on fecundity of the pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Can. Ent. 104: 1209–1212.Google Scholar
Ross, W. A. 1918. The pear psylla. Agric. Gaz. Can. 5: 1134–1136.Google Scholar
Wilde, W. H. A. and Watson, T. K.. 1963. Bionomics of the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Foerster, in the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 41: 953–961.Google Scholar