Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:02:27.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Population Density on Fecundity in Insects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K. E. F. Watt
K. E. F. Watt
Affiliation:
Statistical Research Services, Research Branch, Department of Agriculture Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Four steps are necessary in constructing and utilizing a mathematical model for control of a specific insect pest. First, a large volume of field data must be collected according to a plan which is sound from both statistical and biological points of view (Morris, 1955). Secondly, a suitable procedure for developing component parts of the whole model and fitting these together must be developed (Watt, ms.). Thirdly, after exhaustive study of available data and testing of equations against these data we must determine the appropriate form of equation to express the action of each type of phenomenon governing dynamics of the pest population. This paper and other in the series (e.g., Watt, 1959) are designed to obtain such formulations. Which phenomena are worthy of smdv for a given pest species will become clear through mathematical analysis of life-table data of the type collected by Morris and Miller (1954). Finally, parameter values are obtained from the data and the equations are manipulated io determine optimum control practices, using methods outlined by Watt (ms.).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 92 , Issue 9 , September 1960 , pp. 674 - 695
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allee, W. C. 1931. Animal aggregations. U. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Andersen, F. S. 1957. The effect of density on the birth and death rate. Reprinted from Annual Rept. 1954–1955 Government Pest Infestation Lab., Springforbi, Denmark, 1–27.Google Scholar
Andrewartha, H. G., and Birch, L. C.. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. U. Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Bailey, V. A. 1931. The interaction between hosts and parasites. Quart. J. Math. 2: 68–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. 1957. On theoretical models for competitive and predatory biological systems. Biometrika 44: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellman, Richard. 1957. Dynamic programming. Princeton U. Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Chapman, R. N. 1928. The quantitative analysis of environmental factors. Ecology 9: 111–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiang, C. L. 1954. Competition and other interactions between species. In Statistics and Mathematics in Biology, Iowa State College Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 197–215.Google Scholar
Crombie, A. C. 1942. The effect of crowding upon the oviposition of grain-infestmg insects. J. Exptl. Biol. 19: 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, A. C. 1943. The effect of crowding upon the natality of grain-infestmg insects. Proc. Zool. Soc. (A) 113: 77–98.Google Scholar
Feller, W. 1939. Die Grundlagen der Volterraschen Theorie des Kampfes ums Dasein in wahrscheinlichkeitstheoretischer Behandlung. Acta Biotheoretica 5: 11–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, W. 1940. On the logistic law of growth and its empirical verifications in biology. Acta Biotheoretica 5: 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, H. 1954. An interpretation of the changes in type of the population density effect upon the oviposition rate. Ecology 35: 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujita, H., and Utida, S.. 1953. The effect of population density on the growth of an animal population. Ecology 34 (3): 488–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1959. Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why are there so many kinds of animals? Amer. Nat. 93: 145–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishida, Hiroshi. 1952. Studies on the density effect and the extent of available space in the experimental population of the azuki bean weevil. Res. Population Ecol. I: 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Masaharu. 1955. On the meaning of the “air-space” in the population growth of the red-rust flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). Experimental studies on a role of behavior in the population of injurious insect. 1st report. Oyo-Kontyu 11: 25–31.Google Scholar
Kendall, D. G. 1948. On the generalized ‘birth-and-death’ process. Ann. Math. Statist. 19: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, H. A. 1939. Versuche über die Fruchtbarkeit von Dixippus (Carausius) morosus bei abgestufter Wohndichte und Raumgrösse. Z. Ang. Ent. 25: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostitzin, V. A. 1939. Mathematical biology. George G. Harrap and Co. Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Leslie, P. H. 1957. An analysis of the data for some experiments carried out by Cause with populations of the Protozoa, Paramecium aurelia and Paramecium caudatum. Biometrika 44: 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, P. H. 1958. A stochastic model for studying the properties of certain biological systems by numerical methods. Biometrika 45: 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotka, A. J. 1923. Contribution to quantitative parasitology. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 13: 152–158.Google Scholar
Lotka, A. J. 1925. Elements of physical biology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
MacLagan, D. S. 1932. The effect of population - density upon rate of reproduction with special reference to insects. Proc. Roy. Soc. (B) 111: 437–454.Google Scholar
MacLagan, D. S., and Dunn, E.. 1935. The experimental analysis of the growth of an insect population. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, 55: 126–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators, with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 33: 225–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F., and Miller, C. A. 1954. The development of life tables for the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 32: 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J., and Bailey, V. A.. 1935. The balance of animal populations. Part 1. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1935, pp. 551–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuorteva, M. 1954. Versuche über den Einfluss der Bevölkerungsdichte auf die Nachkommenzahl des Grossen Waldgärtners, Blastophagus piniperda L. Ann. Ent. Fennica 20: 184–189.Google Scholar
Park, T. 1932. Studies in population physiology. I. The relation of numbers to initial population growth in the flower beetle Tribolium confusum Duval. Ecology 13: 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T. 1933. Studies in population physiology. II. Factors regulating initial growth of Tribolium confusum populations, J. Exper. Zool. 65: 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, T. 1936. Studies in population physiology. VI. The effect of differentially conditioned flour upon the fecundity and fertility of Tribolium confusum. J. Exp. Zool. 73: 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, R. 1932. The influence of density of population upon the rate of reproduction in Drosophila. J. Exp. Zool. 63: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, R., and Parker, S. L.. 1922. On the influence of density of population upon the rate of reproduction in Drosophila. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. [U.S.A.] 8: 212–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rich, Earl R. 1956. Egg cannibalism and fecundity in Tribolium. Ecology 37 (1): 109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, O. W. 1947. Observations on grain-weevils, Calandra (Col., Curculionidae). I. General biology and oviposition. Proc. Zool. Soc. 117: 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, F. W., and Sang, J. H.. 1944. The ecological determinants of populations growth in a Drosophila culture. I. Fecundity of adult flies. Proc. Roy. Soc. (B) 132: 258–277.Google Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B. 1954. Population dynamics in Daphnia obtusa Kurz. Ecol. Monogr. 24: 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnov, E., and Polejaeff, W.. 1934. Density of population and sterility of the females in the coccid Lepidosaphes ulmi L. J. Anim. Ecol. 3: 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnov, E., and Wiolovitsh, N.. 1934. Uber dem Zusammenhang zwischen der Populationsdichte und Eierproduction der Weibchen bei der Schildlaus Chionaspis salicis L. Z. Ang. Ent. 20: 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Frederick D. 1952. Experimental methods in population dynamics: A critique. Ecology 33: 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. 1932. A mathematical theory of the growth of population of the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum Duval. Can. J. Res. 6: 632–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, J. 1934. A mathematical theory of the growth of populations of the flour beetle, Tribolium confusum, Duval. III. The effect upon the early stages of population growth of changes in the nutritive value, palatability and density of packing of the flour medium. Can. J. Research 11: 728–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullyett, G. C. 1945. Oviposition by Ephestia kühniella Zeil. J. Ent. Soc. South. Africa 8: 53–59.Google Scholar
Utida, S. 1941a. Studies on experimental population of the azuki bean weevil. Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). I. The effect of population density on the progeny populations. Mem. Coll. Agric. Kyoto Imp. Univ. 48: 1–30.Google Scholar
Utida, S. 1941b. Studies on experimental population of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). The effect of population density on progeny populations under the different conditions of atmospheric moisture. Mem. Coll. Agr. Kyoto Imp. Univ. 49: 1–20.Google Scholar
Utida, S. 1941c. Studies on experimental population of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). III. The effect of population density upon the mortalities of different stages of life cycle. Mem. Coll. Agr. Kyoto Imp. Univ. 49: 21–42.Google Scholar
Utida, S. 1941d. Studies on experimental population of the azuki bean weevil, Callosobruchus chinensis (L.). IV. Analysis of density effect with respect to fecundity and fertility of eggs. Mem. Coll. Agr., Kyoto Imp. Univ. 51: 1–26.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. 1926. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. Acad. Lincei (6) 2: 31–113.Google Scholar
Volterra, V. 1928. Variations and fluctuations of the number of individuals in animal species living together. J. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 3: 3–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wangersky, P. J., and Cunningham, W. J.. 1956. On time lags in equations of growth. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 42: 699–702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watt, K. E. F. 1955. Studies on population productivity. I. Three approaches to the optimum yield problem in populations of Tribolium confusum. Ecol. Monog. 25: 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, K. E. F. 1959. A mathematical model for the effect of densities of attacked and attacking species on the number attacked.— Can. Ent. 91: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, K. E. F. m.s. Mathematical models and insect pest control.Google Scholar
Wright, S. 1926. The biology of population growth. A review. J. Am. Statis. Assn., 1926, pp. 493–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar