Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:24:27.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECT OF DENSITY ON HOST–PARASITE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN HYPERA POSTICA (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) AND BATHYPLECTES ANURUS (HYMENOPTERA: ICHNEUMONIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. A. Latheef ,
K. V. Yeargan  and
B. C. Pass
M. A. Latheef
Affiliation:
Department of Entomologyz, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
K. V. Yeargan
Affiliation:
Department of Entomologyz, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
B. C. Pass
Affiliation:
Department of Entomologyz, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of density on host–parasite interactions between Hypera postica (Gyllenhal) and Bathyplectes anurus (Thomson) was studied in a caged system in the laboratory. There was no significant relationship between proportion of hosts parasitized and host density. The frequency distribution of the parasite’s eggs approximated the Poisson distribution in 83% of the cases. There was a quadratic relationship between number of superparasitized hosts and parasite density. However, no significant correlation between proportion superparasitized and host density was detected. The Nicholsonian area of discovery was inversely related to parasite density with a strong mutual interference constant of −.467.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 8 , August 1977 , pp. 1057 - 1062
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunson, M. H. and Coles, L. W.. 1968. The introduction, release, and recovery of parasites of the alfalfa weevil in Eastern United States. U.S. Dep. Agric. Res. Serv. Prod. Res. Rep. 101. 12 pp.Google Scholar
Duodu, Y. A. and Davis, D. W.. 1974. Selection of alfalfa weevil larval instars by, and mortality due to, the parasite Bathyplectes curculionis (Thomson). Environ. Ent. 3: 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dysart, R. J. and Day, W. H.. 1976. Release and recovery of introduced parasites of the alfalfa weevil in Eastern North America. U.S. Dep. Agric. Res. Serv. Prod. Res. Rep. 167. 61 pp.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. C. 1961. A study in insect multiparasitism. II. The mechanism and control of competition for possession of the host. J. exp. Biol. 38: 605–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. and Yates, F.. 1963. Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar
Griffiths, K. J. and Holling, C. S.. 1969. A competition submodel for parasites and predators. Can. Ent. 101: 785–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1961. Spatial pattern of the imported cabbageworm, Pieris rapae (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), on cultivated Cruciferae. Can. Ent. 93: 945–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1971. Mutual interference between searching insect parasites. J. Anim. Ecol. 40: 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. and May, R. M.. 1973. Stability in insect host-parasite models. J. Anim. Ecol. 42: 693–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. and Rogers, D. J.. 1972. Insect parasite responses in the development of population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 661–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. and Varley, G. C.. 1969. New inductive population model for insect parasites and its bearing on biological control. Nature, Lond. 223: 1133–1137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iwao, S. 1970. Problems of spatial distribution in animal population ecology, pp. 117–149. In Patil, G. P. (Ed.), Random counts in biomedical and social sciences, Vol. 2. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park and London.Google Scholar
Latheef, M. A. and Pass, B. C.. 1975. Sampling cocoon populations of Bathyplectes spp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in Kentucky alfalfa fields. Environ. Ent. 4: 517–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisita, M. 1959. Measuring of the dispersion of individuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Mem. Fac. Sci. Kyushu Univ. E. (Biol.) 2: 215–235.Google Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1933. The balance of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2: 132–178.Google Scholar
Rogers, D. J. 1972. Random search and insect population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 41: 369–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salt, G. 1961. Competition among insect parasitoids, pp. 96–119. In Milthorpe, F. L. (Ed.), Mechanisms in biological competition. Symposia Soc. exp. Biol. No. 15. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stiteler, W. M. and Patil, G. P.. 1971. Variance to mean ratio and Morisita's index as measures of spatial patterns in ecological populations, pp. 423–459. In Patil, G. P. et al. (Ed.), Statistical ecology, Vol. 1, Spatial patterns and statistical distributions. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park and London.Google Scholar
Varley, G. C. and Gradwell, G. R.. 1960. Key factors in population studies. J. Anim. Ecol. 29: 399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, W. E. and Henson, W. R.. 1959. Some sampling attributes of the negative binomial distribution with special reference to forest insects. Forest Sci. 5: 397–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeargan, K. V. and Latheef, M. A.. 1976. Host-parasitoid density relationships between Hypera postica (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Bathyplectes curculionis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). J. Kansas ent. Soc. 49: 551–556.Google Scholar