Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:57:03.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN PINE SHOOTS WITH AND WITHOUT OVIPOSITION BY PISSODES TERMINALIS HOPPING (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Lorraine E. Maclauchlan  and
John H. Borden
Lorraine E. Maclauchlan
Affiliation:
B.C. Forest Service, 515 Columbia Street, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada V2C 2T7
John H. Borden
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The lodgepole terminal weevil, Pissodes terminalis Hopping, is the only member of its genus that consistently oviposits in the expanding terminal shoots of its hosts (Stark and Wood 1964). The white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Peck), oviposits in the year old shoot of spruce and pine (Wallace and Sullivan 1985) and other Pissodes species have their oviposition sites on boles, root collars, and slash (Furniss and Carolin 1977). In southern British Columbia, P. terminalis is primarily univoltine although adults may live and oviposit for 2 or more years. Although its life cycle is closely synchronized with terminal phenology, its life history is extremely variable (Cameron and Stark 1989). Adults are active in late spring to early summer, when they can be found feeding on the tissues of the developing terminal shoot and foliage. Soon after this maturation feeding, mating occurs, and oviposition punctures are excavated in the bark of the new terminal. Usually a single egg is deposited into each puncture (Drouin et al. 1963; Stark and Wood 1964; Maclauchlan 1992).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 127 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 267 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borden, J.H., Hunt, D.W.A., Miller, D.R., and Slessor, K.N.. 1986. Orientation in forest Coleoptera: An uncertain outcome of responses by individual beetles to variable stimuli. pp. 97–109in Payne, T.L., Birch, M.C., and Kennedy, C.E.J. (Eds.), Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Butkewich, S.L., Prokopy, R.J., and Green, T.A.. 1987. Discrimination of occupied host fruit by plum curculio females (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 13: 1833–1841.Google Scholar
Cameron, E.A., and Stark, R.W.. 1989. Variation in the life cycle of the lodgepole terminal weevil, Pissodes terminalis Hopping (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in California. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 793–801.Google Scholar
Drouin, J.A., Sullivan, C.R., and Smith, S.G.. 1963. Occurrence of Pissodes terminalis Hopp. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Canada: Life history, behavior, and cytogenetic identification. The Canadian Entomologist 95: 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, R.L., and Carolin, V.M.. 1977. Western Forest Insects. USDA Forest Service Misc. Publ. 1339.Google Scholar
Maclauchlan, L.E. 1992. Attack Dynamics, Impact and Biology of Pissodes terminalis Hopping, in Regenerating Lodgepole Pine Stands. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, B.C.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. 1981. Epideictic pheromones influencing spacing patterns of phytophagous insects. pp. 181–213in Nordlund, D.A., Jones, R.L., and Lewis, W.L. (Eds.), Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control. Wiley, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., and Owens, E.D.. 1983. Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 28: 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitberg, B.D., and Prokopy, R.J.. 1984. Host discrimination by adult and larval European apple sawflies Hoplocampa testudinea (Klug)(Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae). Environmental Entomology 13: 1000–1003.Google Scholar
Stansly, P.A., and Cate, J.R.. 1984. Discrimination by ovipositing boll weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) against previously infested Hampea (Malvaceae) flower buds. Environmental Entomology 13: 1361–1365.Google Scholar
Stark, R.W., and Wood, D.L.. 1964. The biology of Pissodes terminalis Hopping (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in California. The Canadian Entomologist 96: 1208–1218.Google Scholar
Wallace, D.R., and Sullivan, C.R.. 1985. The white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): A review emphasizing behavior and development in relation to physical factors. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 116 (Supplement): 39–62.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. 1989. SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Inc., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar