Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:15:39.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIFFERENTIATION OF THE SPECIES OF UROLEPIS (HYMENOPTERA: CHALCIDOIDEA: PTEROMALIDAE), POTENTIAL BIOCONTROL AGENTS OF FILTH FLIES (DIPTERA: MUSCIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gary A.P. Gibson
Gary A.P. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Systematic Entomology Section, Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0C6
*
1 E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The world species of Urolepis Walker are reviewed and a key is given to differentiate females of Urolepis singularis (Ashmead) and males and females of Urolepis maritima (Walker) and Urolepis rufipes (Ashmead). Lectotypes are designated for U. rufipes and U. singularis. Biological literature relating to parasitism of house flies and stable flies by U. maritima and U. rufipes is summarized, and known hosts of the three species and collection records within the Nearctic region are given. Urolepis maritima is recorded for the first time from the Nearctic region, and U. rufipes is confirmed from northern Europe (Denmark and Germany).

Résumé

On trouvera ici une révision des espèces d’Urolepis Walker à l’échelle mondiale; une clé permettra de différencier les femelles d’Urolepis singularis (Ashmead) de même que les mâles et les femelles d’Urolepis maritima (Walker) et d’Urolepis rufipes (Ashmead). Des lectotypes d’U. rufipes et d’U. singularis ont été choisis. La littérature sur la biologie du parasitisme des Mouches domestiques et des Mouches des étables par U. maritima et U. rufipes est résumée. Les hôtes connus des trois espèces sont énumérés et les comptes-rendus de récolte dans la zone néarctique sont présentés. Urolepis maritima est signalé pour la première fois dans la zone néarctique et la présence d’U. rufipes dans le nord de l’Europe (Danemark et Allemagne) est confirmée.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 132 , Issue 4 , August 2000 , pp. 391 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arber, A. 1965. The Gramineae: a study of cereal, bamboo and grass. New York: Wheldon and Wesley, Ltd.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1896. Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Transactions of the American Entomological Society 23: 179–234Google Scholar
Axtell, R.C. 1986. Status and potential of biological control agents in livestock and poultry management systems. pp. 1–9in Patterson, R.S., Rutz, D.A. (Eds.), Biological control of muscoid flies. Entomological Society of America, Miscellaneous Publication 62Google Scholar
Bellini, R., Maini, S. 1989. Presenza stagionale e attività di parassitoidi (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) di Ditteri sinantropici in allevamenti zootecnici della Romagna. Bollettino dell'Istituto di Entomologia “Guido Grandi” dell'Università di Bologna 43: 207–22Google Scholar
Blanchot, P. 1992. Nouveau répertoire bibliographique et nouvelles données biologiques sur les parasites de Musca domestica L. (Diptera, Muscidae). Biologie et Évolution des Insectes 5: 1–54Google Scholar
Bolte, K.B. 1996. Techniques for obtaining scanning electron micrographs of minute arthropods. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario 127: 67–87Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1965. A review of the chalcidoid fauna of the Moldavian S.S.R., with descriptions of new species (Hymenoptera). Acta Faunistica Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 11: 5–38Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1968. Contributions to the Czechoslovak fauna of Chalcidoidea (Hym.). Acta Faunistica Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 12: 231–60Google Scholar
Bouček, Z. 1977. A faunistic review of the Yugoslavian Chalcidoidea (parasitic Hymenoptera). Acta Entomologica Jugoslavica 13(suppl.): 1–145Google Scholar
Bouček, Z., Graham, MWR de V. 1978. Chalcidoidea. pp. 67–110in Fitton, M.G., de V Graham, M.W.R., Bouček, Z.R.J., Fergusson, N.D.M., Huddleston, T., Quinlan, J., Richards, O.W. (Eds.), A check list of British Insects. 2nd ed. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects XI(4)Google Scholar
Bouček, Z., Heydon, S.L. 1997. Pteromalidae. pp. 541–692in Gibson, G.A.P., Huber, J.T., Woolley, J.B. (Eds.), Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Ottawa: National Research Council Canada Research PressGoogle Scholar
Bouček, Z., Rasplus, J-Y. 1991. Illustrated key to West-Palearctic genera of Pteromalidae (Hymenoptera — Chalcidoidea). Paris: Institut National de la Recherche AgronomiqueGoogle Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1967. Family Pteromalidae. pp. 254–70 in Krombein, K.V., Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of America North of Mexico — synoptic catalog (second supplement). United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Monograph 2Google Scholar
Burks, B.D. 1979. Pteromalidae. pp. 768–835in Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America north of Mexico. I. Symphyta and Apocrita (Parasitica). Washington: Smithsonian Institution PressGoogle Scholar
KW von, Dalla Torre. 1898. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. V. Chalcididae et Proctotrupidae. LipsiaeGoogle Scholar
Deonier, D.L., Regensburg, J.T. 1978. Biology and immature stages of Parydra quadrituberculata (Diptera: Ephydridae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 71: 341–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draeger, U. 1997. Ökofaunistische und verhaltensbiologische Untersuchungen klärschlammbewohnender, koprophager Sepsidae (Diptera). Inaugural Dissertation, Free University of Berlin, BerlinGoogle Scholar
Dzhanokmen, K.A. 1978. Family Pteromalidae (Pteromalids). pp. 57–229in Medvedev, G.S. (Ed.), Opredelitel Nasekomykh Evropeiskoi Chasti SSR. III. Hymenoptera. II. Leningrad: Nauka [English translation in 1987: pp. 88–413 in Keys to insects of the European part of the USSR. Vol. III (Hymenoptera, pt. II). New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Company]Google Scholar
Fabritius, K. 1981 a. Combaterea biologicǍ dirijatǍ a mustei sinantrope Musca domestica L. (Diptera–Muscidae) cu ajutorul parazitului Muscidifurax raptor Gir. et Sand. (Hymenoptera–Pteromalidae). Studii si Cercetari de Biologie (Seria Biologie Animala) 33: 89–92Google Scholar
Fabritius, K. 1981 b. Parazitii pupariilor de Musca domestica L. (Diptera, Muscidae) si utilizarea lor in combaterea biologica dirijata. Lucrârilor Stiintificâ Biol. Constanta 1981: 11–17Google Scholar
Fabritius, K. 1981 c. Über das natürliche Vorkommen und den Wirtskreis von Parasiten synanthroper Fliegen. Zeitschrift für angewandte Zoologie 68: 139–49Google Scholar
Fabritius, K. 1983. Parazitoizii larvelor şi pupariilor de Musca domestica L. (Diptera — Muscidae). Studii si Cercetari de Biologie Seria Biologie Animala 35: 82–8Google Scholar
Fabritius, K. 1987. Die parasiten von Musca domestica L. (Diptera–Muscidae): eine Zusammenfassende Übersicht. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie 5: 174–81Google Scholar
Fabritius, K., Klunker, R. 1991. Merkblätter über angewandte Parasitenkunde und Schädlingsbekämpfung. Die Larven- und Puparienparasitoide von synanthropen Fliegen in Europa. Angewandte Parasitologie 32: 1–24Google Scholar
Fabritius, K., Ursu, A. 1981. Cercetari ecologice privind relatiile dintre dipterele sinantrope si unii paraziti specifici al acestora, in vederea cuncasterii posibilitâtilor de combatere biologica. Rezumatele Lucrârilor Sesiune Stiintificâ Institutul de Igienâ si Sânâtate Publicâ-Bucuresti 16: 103–13 (mimeograph)Google Scholar
Floate, K., Khan, B., Gibson, G. 1999. Hymenopterous parasitoids of filth fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae in cattle feedlots. The Canadian Entomologist 131: 347–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, A. 1856. Hymenopterologische Studien. 2. Chalcidiae und Proctotrupii. AachenGoogle Scholar
Geden, C.J., Rutz, D.A., Scott, J.C., Long, S.L. 1992. Susceptibility of house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) and five pupal parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to abamectin and seven commercial insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 435–40Google ScholarPubMed
Gibson, G.A.P. 1997. Chapter 2. Morphology and terminology. pp. 16–44in Gibson, G.A.P., Huber, J.T., Woolley, J.B. (Eds.), Annotated keys to the genera of Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera). Ottawa: National Research Council Canada Research PressGoogle Scholar
Goulet, H., Mason, W.R.M. 1993. Chapter 4. Use of keys. pp. 60–4 in Goulet, H., Huber, J.T. (Eds.), Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Agriculture Canada Publication 1894/EGoogle Scholar
Graham MWR, de V. 1969. The Pteromalidae of north-western Europe (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Entomology Supplement 16: 1–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, D.R., Petersen, J.J. 1986 a. Cold acclimation and prolonged low temperature survival of filth fly parasites (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Environmental Entomology 15: 936–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, D.R., Petersen, J.J. 1986 b. Overwintering of filth fly parasites (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) in open silage in eastern Nebraska. Environmental Entomology 15: 1296–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, C. 1991. A catalogue of Chalcidoidea described by C.G. Thomson, with a checklist of Swedish species. Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement 38: 1–70Google Scholar
Hardy, D.E., Delfinado, M.D. 1980. Insects of Hawaii. Vol. 13. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha III, series Schizophora section Acalypterae, exclusive of family Drosophilidae. Honolulu: University Press of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
Heitland, W. 1988. Untersuchungen an Parasitoiden von Dipteren im Strandanwurf der Kieler Förde. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 39: 129–45Google Scholar
Henderson, C.E., Rutz, D.A. 1991. Species composition of parasitoids attacking house flies (Musca domestica Linnaeus) in high-rise poultry farms in New York State (USA). Journal of Agricultural Entomology 8: 51–8Google Scholar
Henriksen, K.L. 1919. De europaeiske Vandsnyltehvepse og deres Biologi. Entomologiske Meddelelser 12: 137–251Google Scholar
Heydon, S.L. 1994. Taxonomic changes in Nearctic Pteromalidae, II. New synonymy and four new genera (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 96: 323–38Google Scholar
Hoebeke, E.R., Rutz, D.A. 1988. Trichomalopsis dubius (Ashmead) and Dibrachys cavus (Walker): newly discovered pupal parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) of house flies and stable flies associated with livestock manure. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 81: 493–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogsette, J.A., Farkas, R., Coler, R. 1994. Hymenopteran pupal parasites recovered from house fly and stable fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae collected on livestock and poultry facilities in northern and central Hungary. Environmental Entomology 23: 778–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, F.G., Polhemus, D.A. 1991. A review of the Hawaiian stream insect fauna. pp. 40–50in Devick, W.S. (Ed.), New Directions in Research, Management and Conservation of Hawaiian Freshwater Stream Ecosystems, Proceedings of the 1990 Symposium on Freshwater Stream Biology and Fisheries Management. Honolulu: Department of Land and Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
Jones, C.J., Weinzierl, R.A. 1997. Geographical and temporal variation in pteromalid (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitism of stable fly and house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae collected from Illinois cattle feedlots. Environmental Entomology 26: 421–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamijo, K., Grissell, E.E. 1982. Species of Trichomalopsis Crawford (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae) from rice paddy, with description of two new species. Kontyû 50: 76–87Google Scholar
Klunker, R. 1994. Zum Auftreten von Pupariumparasitoiden als natürliche Feinde von Stallfliegen. Applied Parasitology 35: 36–50Google Scholar
Klunker, R., Fabritius, K. 1992 a. Bibliographie über Pupariumparasitoide synanthroper Fliegen. Beiträge zur Entomologie 42: 331–429Google Scholar
Klunker, R., Fabritius, K. 1992 b. Ergebnisse und Erfahrungen mit der Stammhaltung und Massenzucht einiger Pupariumparasitoide von Fliegen auf Kältekonservierten Wirtspuparien. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie 8: 287–94Google Scholar
Lysyk, T.J. 1995. Parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae, Ichneumonidae) of the filth fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae at dairies in Alberta. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 659–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J.R., Petersen, J.J. 1989. Effect of temperature on parasitism, development, and diapause of the filth fly parasite, Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Environmental Entomology 18: 728–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, J.R., Petersen, J.J. 1990. Effects of host age, host density and parent age on reproduction of the filth fly parasite Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Medical and Veterinary Entomology 4: 255–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, J.A., Schulz, T.A., Collar, C., Mullens, B.A. 1991. Relative abundance of stable fly and house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupal parasites (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae; Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) on confinement dairies in California, USA. Environmental Entomology 20: 915–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mourier, H. 1971. Seasonal occurrence of pupal parasitoids from the housefly Musca domestica (Diptera) in Denmark. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 134: 109–18Google Scholar
Mourier, H., Hannine, S.B. 1969. Activity of pupal parasites from Musca domestica (Diptera) in Denmark. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening 132: 211–16Google Scholar
Nabrotzky, F., Rosay, B., Sadler, T.D. 1974. Further studies on the ecology and control of brine flies of the Great Salt Lake. pp. 32–6 in Rosay, B., Packard, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting, Utah Mosquito Abatement Association, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1–2 Oct. 1973Google Scholar
Norrbom, A.L. 1983. Four acalyptrate Diptera reared from dead horseshoe crabs. Entomological News 94: 117–21Google Scholar
Noyes, J.S. 1998. Catalogue of the Chalcidoidea of the World. CD-Rom. Amsterdam: Expert Center for Taxonomic InformationGoogle Scholar
Pawson, B.M., Petersen, J.J. 1990. Temperature preference and effects of photoperiod on oviposition behavior of five pteromalid wasps (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) using house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) pupae as hosts. Environmental Entomology 19: 1452–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, B.M., Petersen, J.J., Holtzer, T.O. 1987. Competitive parasitism of house fly pupae (Diptera: Muscidae) by Muscidifurax zaraptor and Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 24: 66–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peck, O. 1963. A catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera). The Canadian Entomologist Supplement 30Google Scholar
Petersen, J.J. 1986. Augmentation of early season releases of filth fly (Diptera: Muscidae) parasites (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) with freeze-killed hosts. Environmental Entomology 15: 590–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J.J., Guzman, D.R., Pawson, B.M. 1985. Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a new parasite record for filth flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in Nebraska, USA. Journal of Medical Entomology 22: 345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, J.J., Catangui, M.A., Watson, D.W. 1991. Parasitoid-induced mortality of house fly pupae by pteromalid wasps in the laboratory. Biological Control 1: 275–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, R.A. 1991. The insect fauna and some other characteristics of natural salt springs on Saltspring Island, British Columbia. pp. 51–61in Williams, D.D., Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Arthropods of springs, with particular reference to Canada. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 155Google Scholar
Rueda, L.M., Axtell, R.C. 1985. Guide to common species of pupal parasites (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) of the house fly and other muscoid flies associated with poultry and livestock manure. North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Technical Bulletin 278Google Scholar
Scott, J.G., Rutz, D.A. 1988. Comparative toxicities of seven insecticides to house flies (Diptera: Muscidae) and Urolepis rufipes Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 81: 804–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seymour, R.C., Campbell, J.B. 1993. Predators and parasitoids of house flies and stable flies (Diptera: Muscidae) in cattle confinements in west central Nebraska. Environmental Entomology 22: 212–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaumar, N.F., El Agoze, M.M., Mohammed, S.K. 1990. Parasites and predators associated with blow flies and flesh flies in Cairo region (Egypt). Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology 20: 123–32Google Scholar
Skovgård, H., Jespersen, J.B. 1999. Activity and relative abundance of hymenopterous parasitoids that attack puparia of Musca domestica and Stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae) on confined pig and cattle farms in Denmark. Bulletin of Entomological Research 89: 263–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. 1988. Dispersal behavior of two pteromalid parasitoids of house fly pupae in a dairy environment (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). pp. 333–4 in Gupta, V.K. (Ed.), Advances in Parasitic Hymenoptera Research, Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on the Taxonomy and Biology of Parasitic Hymenoptera, Gainesville, November 1987. Leiden: E.J. BrillGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1985. The occurrence and biology of Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), a parasitoid of house flies in New York dairies. Environmental Entomology 14: 365–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1986. Development rate and survivorship of immature Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) a parasitoid of pupal house flies. Environmental Entomology 15: 1301–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1987. Reproduction, adult survival and intrinsic rate of growth of Urolepis rufipes (Hymenoptera Pteromalidae), a pupal parasitoid of house flies, Musca domestica. Entomophaga 32: 315–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1991 a. Microhabitat associations of hymenopterous parasitoids that attack house fly pupae at dairy farms in central New York. Environmental Entomology 20: 675–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1991 b. Relationship of microhabitat to incidence of house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) immatures and their parasitoids at dairy farms in central New York. Environmental Entomology 20: 669–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1991 c. Seasonal and relative abundance of hymenopterous parasitoids attacking house fly pupae at dairy farms in central New York. Environmental Entomology 20: 661–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A. 1991 d. The influence of light and moisture gradients on the attack rate of parasitoids foraging for hosts in a laboratory arena (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 4: 195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L., Rutz, D.A., Scoles, G.A. 1989. Influence of habitat and temperature on dispersal behavior of two pteromalid parasitoids of houseflies during an inundative release at a dairy barn. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 3: 169–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swezey, O.H. 1947. Notes and exhibitions. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society 13: 28–31Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1878. Hymenoptera Scandinaviae 5. Pteromalus (Svederus) continuatio. LundGoogle Scholar
von Heyden, C. 1844. Ferner Nachrichten über Insecten der Salinen. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 5: 202–5Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1834. Monographia Chalciditum. Entomological Magazine 2: 148–79Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1839. Monographia Chalciditum. Part 1. LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, F. 1846. List of the specimens of hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part 1. Chalcidites. LondonGoogle Scholar
Walker, F. 1848. List of the specimens of Hymenopterous insects in the collection of the British Museum. Part 1. Chalcidites. Additional species. LondonGoogle Scholar
Walker, F. 1872. Notes on Chalcidiae. Part VI. Hormoceridae, Sphegigasteridae, Pteromalidae, Elasmidae, Elachistidae, Eulophidae, Entedonidae, Tetrastichidae, Trichogrammidae. LondonGoogle Scholar
Wall, I. 1972. Vorläufige Gliederung der Pteromaliden Mitteleuropas (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Pteromalidae). Entomologische Abhandlungen 39: 1–146Google Scholar
Zchori-Fein, E., Geden, C.J., Rutz, D.A. 1992. Microsporidioses of Muscidifurax raptor (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) and other pteromalid parasitoids of muscoid flies. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 60: 292–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar