Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:53:43.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DIFFERENCE IN RADIOSENSITIVITY OF TWO COLONIES OF TOBACCO BUDWORMS, HELIOTHIS VIRESCENS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. I. Proshold  and
J. A. Bartell
F. I. Proshold
Affiliation:
Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fargo, North Dakota
J. A. Bartell
Affiliation:
Metabolism and Radiation Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Fargo, North Dakota
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sterility induced by gamma irradiation of the adult male tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens (F.), was studied in two colonies, one was reared in the laboratory for more than 60 generations (laboratory strain) and the other reared for fewer than 9 generations (wild strain). When irradiated males were crossed with untreated females, the percentage egg hatch for each dose was lower with the laboratory than with the wild strain. When laboratory and wild females were crossed reciprocally with irradiated males, the fertilities were similar to those of the laboratory and wild strains, respectively. When irradiated males were crossed with female progeny from reciprocal crosses, the percentage egg hatch was similar to that of the wild strain.Wild strain females were nearly monogamous for the first several generations, but F0 females mated nearly as frequently as females of the laboratory strain.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 104 , Issue 7 , July 1972 , pp. 995 - 1002
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, R. S. 1963. Laboratory techniques for rearing Heliothis species on artificial medium. U.S. Dep. Agric. ARS-33-84, 4 p.Google Scholar
El Sayed, E. I. and Graves, J. B.. 1969 a. Effects of gamma radiation on the tobacco budworm. I. Irradiation of pupae. J. econ. Ent. 62: 289–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Sayed, E. I. 1969 b. Effects of gamma radiation on the tobacco budworm. II. Irradiation of moths. J. econ. Ent. 62: 293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Sayed, E. I. 1969 c. Effects of gamma radiation on the tobacco budworm. III. Irradiation of eggs and larvae. J. econ. Ent. 62: 296–298.Google Scholar
Flint, H. M. and Kressin, E. L.. 1967. Gamma irradiation of pupae of the tobacco budworm. J. econ. Ent. 60: 1655–1659.Google Scholar
Flint, H. M. and Kressin, E. L.. 1968. Gamma irradiation of the tobacco budworm: sterilization, competitiveness, and observations on reproductive biology. J. econ. Ent. 61: 477–483.Google Scholar
Knipling, E. F. 1970. Suppression of pest Lepidoptera by releasing partially sterile males: a theoretical appraisal. Bioscience 20: 465–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. T. and Holt, G. G.. 1968. Inherited sterility in progeny of irradiated male cabbage loopers. J. econ. Ent. 61: 928–931.Google Scholar
North, D. T. and Holt, G. G.. 1969. Population suppression by transmission of inherited sterility to progeny of irradiated cabbage loopers, Trichoplusia ni. Can. Ent. 101: 513–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proshold, F. I. and Bartell, J. A.. 1970. Inherited sterility in progeny of irradiated male tobacco budworms: effects on reproduction, developmental time, and sex ratio. J. econ. Ent. 63: 280–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proshold, F. I. and Bartell, J. A.. 1972 a. Postembryonic growth and development of F1 and F2 tobacco budworms (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from partially sterile males. Can. Ent. 104: 165–172.Google Scholar
Proshold, F. I. and Bartell, J. A.. 1972 b. Inherited sterility and postembryonic survival of two generations of tobacco budworms, Heliothis virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), from partially sterile males. Can. Ent. 104: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.. 1969. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Spates, G. E. Jr. and Hightower, B. G.. 1970. Variations in the size and reproductive capacity of wild-type and laboratory-adapted populations of the screw-worm fly. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1381–1385.Google Scholar