Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:47:39.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEVELOPMENT OF EGGS IN SOME TRUE BUGS (HEMIPTERA–HETEROPTERA). PART I. PENTATOMOIDEA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. Javahery
M. Javahery
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Entomology Unit and Lyman Entomological Museum, Macdonald Campus of McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Québec, Canada H9X 3V9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Development of eggs of 35 species of Nearctic and Palearctic Pentatomoidea are described. Eggs are discussed in relation to the number of ovarioles of each species, characteristics of eggs, incubation time, diapause, embryonic development, embryonic orientation, hatch, and parasitism, and are classified into two groups in relation to then-form, position of egg-burster, and hatch. Emergence of first-instar larvae is described in representatives of five families.

Résumé

Cet article décrit le dévelopement de l’oeuf de 35 espèces de Pentatomoidea Néarctiques et Paléarctiques. La formation de l’oeuf en relation avec le système reproductif de l’hôte, les caractéristiques distinctives de l’oeuf tels que, la durée de l’incubation, la diapause, le développement embryonnaire, le clivage de l’embryon, l’éclosion, ainsi que parasitisation des oeufs sont discutés pour chacune des espèces. Les membres de cette superfamille sont classés en deux groupes selon la forme, la position de l’ovirupteur et l’éclosion des oeufs. La première description du mécanisme de l’éclosion des oeufs et de l’émergence du premier stade larvaire sont mentionnées pour cinq familles de ce groupe de punaises.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 401 - 433
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biehler, J.A., and McPherson, J.E.. 1982. Life history and laboratory rearing of Galgupha ovalis (Hemiptera: Corimelaenidae), with descriptions of immature stages. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 75: 465–470.Google Scholar
Boselli, F.B. 1932. Studio biologico Emitteri che attaccano le nocciuole in Sicilia. Bollettino del Laboratorio di Zoologia Portici 26: 142–309.Google Scholar
Butler, E.B. 1923. A Biology of the British Hemiptera–Heteroptera. London. viii + 682 pp.Google Scholar
Carayon, J. 1950. Nombre et disposition des ovarioles dans les ovaires des Hémiptères–Hétéroptères. Bulletin, Muséum, Paris, 2e Sér. 22(4): 470–475.Google Scholar
Carayon, J. 1954. Organes assumant les fonctions de la spermathèque chez divers Hétéroptères. Bulletin Societé Zoologie, France 79(2–3): 187–197.Google Scholar
Cobben, R.H. 1968. Evolutionary Trends in Heteroptera. Part 1. Eggs, Architecture of the Shell, Gross Embryology and Eclosion. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, Netherlands. 459 pp.Google Scholar
Dolling, W.R. 1991. The Hemiptera. Oxford University Press, England. ix + 274 pp.Google Scholar
Esselbaugh, C.O. 1946. A study of the eggs of the Pentatomidae (Hemiptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 34: 667–691.Google Scholar
Gross, J. 1901. Untersuchungen über das Ovarium der Hemiptera, zugleich ein Beitrage zur Amitosenfrage. Zeitschrift für Wissenschaften Zoologie 69: 139–201.Google Scholar
Gross, J. 1903. Untersuchungen üben die Histologie des Insectenovariums. Zoologischen Jahrbuchern (Anatomie) 18(1): 72–176.Google Scholar
Harris, M. 1766. The Aurelian or Natural History of English Insects. London. P1. 22, Figs. n and p.Google Scholar
Hinton, H.E. 1981. Biology of Insect Eggs. Pergamon, New York, NY. Published as a 3 volume set, 1125 pp.Google Scholar
Javahery, M. 1967. The Biology of some Pentatomoidea and their Egg Parasites. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, England. 475 pp.Google Scholar
Javahery, M. 1968. The egg parasite complex of British Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera): Taxonomy of Telenominae (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 120: 417–436.Google Scholar
Javahery, M. 1986. Biology and ecology of Picromerus bidens (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in southeastern Canada. Entomological News 97: 87–98.Google Scholar
Javahery, M. 1988. Eggs of land Heteroptera and their relation to the evolution of the group. Abstract, p. 6c. Proceedings of the XVIII International Congress of Entomology, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.Google Scholar
Javahery, M. 1990. Biology and ecological adaptation of the green stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in Québec and Ontario. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 83(2): 201–206.Google Scholar
Javahery, M., and McFarlane, J.E.. 1992. Biology of eggs in some true bugs. Part I. Pentatomoidea. Abstract No. 32, p. 41. Proceedings of the XIX International Congress of Entomology, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Kudô, S. 1990. Maternal care in Elasmucha spp. Insectarium 27: 156–195. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Kudô, S. 1992. Ovariole number in Elasmucha bugs (Heteroptera, Acanthosomatidae) and its implications for a saltatory evolutionary process. Abstract no. 33, p. 41. Proceedings of the XIX International Congress of Entomology, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Leston, D. 1953. Note on the Ethiopian Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera). XVI: An Acanthosomid from Angola, with remarks upon the status and morphology of Acanthosomidae Stål. Publicaçóes Culturais Companhia de Diamantes de Angola 16: 121–132.Google Scholar
Leston, D. 1955. Note on the Ethiopian Pentatomoidea (Hem.) XVIII: The eggs of three Nigerian Shieldbugs, with a tentative summary of egg form in Pentatomoidea. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 91: 33–36.Google Scholar
Leston, D., and Southwood, T.R.E.. 1954. The structure of the egg and the egg-burster of Sehirus bicolor (L.) (Hem., Cydnidae). The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 90: 201–202.Google Scholar
Lockwood, J.A., and Story, R.N.. 1986. Embryonic orientation in Pentatomids: Its mechanism and function in southern green stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 79: 963–970.Google Scholar
Makhotin, A.A. 1947. Materials relating to the development of E. integriceps. pp. 19–48in Fedatov, D.M. (Ed.), The Noxious Little Tortoise, Eurygaster integriceps Puton. Moscow 2. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
McPherson, J.E. 1982. The Pentatomoidea (Hemiptera) of Northeastern North America with Emphasis on the Fauna of Illinois. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL. 240 pp.Google Scholar
Miyamoto, S. 1957. List of ovariole numbers in Japanese Heteroptera. Sieboldia 2(1): 69–82.Google Scholar
Myers, J.G. 1926. Biological Notes on New Zealand Heteroptera. No. 1, pp. 69–82. Transaction of the New Zealand Institute 56: 449–511.Google Scholar
Pendergrast, J.G. 1952. Studies on the biology of Pentatomid bugs of the genus Rhopalimorpha Dallas (Heteroptera). Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 80: 143–153.Google Scholar
Puchkova, L.V. 1959. The eggs of true bugs (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). V. Pentotomoidea. Revue d'Entomologie de l'URSS 38: 634–648. [In Russian with English summary.]Google Scholar
Puchkova, L.V. 1961. The eggs of Hemiptera. VI. Pentatomoidea. 2. Pentatomidae and Plataspidae. Revue d'Entomologie de l'URSS 40: 131–143. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Puchkova, L.V. 1966. The morphology and biology of the egg of the terrestrial bugs (Hemiptera). Horae. Soc. Ent. Un. Sovet. 51: 75–132. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Ren, S. 1992. An Iconography of Hemiptera–Heteroptera Eggs in China. Science Pub. Co. 118 pp. + 80 pls. [In Chinese with English Introduction.]Google Scholar
Ren, S., Guo, S., and Zhou, X.. 1990. Scanning electron microscopic observation on egg-bursters of terrestrial heteroptera. Acta Entomologica Sinica 33: 189–192. [In Chinese with summary in English.]Google Scholar
Schumacher, F. 1917. Eisprenger bei Wanzen aus der Groupe der Pentatomiden (Hemiptera–Heteroptera). Sitz Berichte Gessellschaft Naturf Freunde Berlin 1917: 438–443.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E. 1956. The structure of the eggs of the terrestrial Heteroptera and its relationship to the classification of the group. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 108: 163–221.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E., and Hine, D.J.. 1950. Further notes on the biology of Sehirus bicolor (L.) (Hem. Cydnidae). The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 86: 299–301.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E., and Leston, D.. 1959. Land and Water Bugs of the British Isles. The Wayside and Woodland Series. London. ix + 436 pp.Google Scholar
Stokes, W.G. 1950. The early stages of Sehirus bicolor L. (Hem., Cydnidae). The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 89: 309–310.Google Scholar
Vodjdani, S. 1954. Contribution à l'étude des punaises des Céréales et en particulier d'Eurygaster integriceps Puton. (Hemiptera, Pentatornidae, Scutelleridae). Ann. Epiphyt. 1954(2): 105–160.Google Scholar
Woodward, T.E. 1950. Ovariole and testis follicle number in the Heteroptera. The Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 86: 82–84.Google Scholar