Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:16:31.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESCRIPTION OF THE MATURE LARVAE OF THREE HOPLITIS (HYMENOPTERA: APOIDEA: MEGACHILIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. Torres ,
S.F. Gayubo ,
J. Tormos  and
J.D. Asis
F. Torres
Affiliation:
Unidad de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37071 Salamanca, Spain
S.F. Gayubo
Affiliation:
Unidad de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37071 Salamanca, Spain
J. Tormos
Affiliation:
Unidad de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37071 Salamanca, Spain
J.D. Asis
Affiliation:
Unidad de Zoología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Salamanca, 37071 Salamanca, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mature larvae of three species of Hoplitis, namely Hoplitis anceyi (Pérez), Hoplitis anthodemnion Michener, and Hoplitis nitidula (Morawitz), are described and compared with the other known larvae in the genus. The morphology of the spiracles, antennal discs, and antennal papillae, the absence of a seta on the mandibular basis, and the shape of the vertex permit the characterization of each species. Furthermore, H. anthodemnion has the integument covered by setiform spicules. Nevertheless, there is no clear separation between the three species studied and those previously known, and larval morphology does not support the consideration of Anthocopa and Hoplitis as separate genera.

Résumé

On trouvera ici la description des larves à maturité de trois espèces d’Hoplitis, Hoplitis anceyi (Pérez), Hoplitis anthodemnion Michener et Hoplitis nitidula (Morawitz); les larves sont comparées à celles d’autres espèces du même genre. La morphologie des stigmates, des disques et des papilles antennaires, l’absence de soie à la base de la mandibule et la forme du vertex caractérisent ces espèces. De plus, chez Hoplitis anthodemnion le tégument est recouvert de spicules sétiformes. Néanmoins, il n’y a pas de distinction claire entre les trois espèces étudiées et les espèces déjà connues et la morphologie larvaire ne permet pas de considérer Anthocopa et Hoplitis comme des genres différents.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 129 , Issue 6 , December 1997 , pp. 1067 - 1078
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, J.R., Kuhn, E.D., and Bambara, S.B.. 1985. Nests and immature stages of leafcutter bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 58(2): 290–313.Google Scholar
Dufour, L., and Perris, E.. 1840. Sur les insectes hyménoptères qui nichent dans l'interieur de tiges seches de la ronce. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 9: 5–53.Google Scholar
Eickwort, G.C. 1973. Biology of the European mason bee, Hoplitis anthocopoides (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), in New York State. Search Agriculture 3: 1–31.Google Scholar
Enslin, E. 1925. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Hymenopteren, IV. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 1925: 177–210.Google Scholar
Grandi, G. 1935. Contributi alla conoscenza degli imenotteri aculeati. XV. Bollettino dell'Istituto di Entomologia della Universitá di Bologna 8: 27–121.Google Scholar
McGinley, R.J. 1981. Systematics of the Colletidae based on mature larvae with phenetic analysis of apoid larvae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). University of California Publications in Entomology 91: 1–307.Google Scholar
Micheli, L. 1930. Note biologiche e morfologiche sugli imenotteri (contributo 2). Memorie della Societá Entomologica Italiana 9: 46–66.Google Scholar
Micheli, L. 1931. Note biologiche e morfologiche sugli imenotteri (contributo 3). Memorie della Societá Italiana di Scienze Naturali e del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano 70: 19–28.Google Scholar
Micheli, L. 1933. Note biologiche e morfologiche sugli imenotteri (contributo 4). Memorie della Societá Entomologica Italiana 12: 5–15.Google Scholar
Michener, C.D. 1953. Comparative morphological and systematic studies of bee larvae with a key to the families of hymenopterous larvae. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 35(8): 987–1102.Google Scholar
Michener, C.D., McGinley, R.J., and Danforth, B.N.. 1994. The Bee Genera of North and Central America (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Rasmont, P., Ebmer, P.A.Banaszak, J., and Van der Zanden, G.. 1995. Hymenoptera Apoidea Gallica. Liste taxonomique des abeilles de France, de Belgique, de Suisse et du Grand Duché de Luxembourg. Bulletin de la Société Entomologique de France 100 (h.s.): 1–98.Google Scholar
Rozen, J.G. Jr., 1994. Biology and immature stages of some cuckoo bees belonging to Brachynomadini, with descriptions of two new species (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Nomadinae). American Museum Novitates 3089.Google Scholar
Torchio, P.F., and Torchio, D.M.. 1975. Larvae of the Apidae (Hymenoptera, Apoidea), Part I: Apini, Apis. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 20: 1–35.Google Scholar
Van der Zanden, G. 1988. Beitrag zur Systematik und Nomenclatur der Paläarktischen Osmiini, mit Angaben über lhre Verbreitung. Zoologische Mededelingen 62: 113–133.Google Scholar