Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:35:03.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Crowdsourcing for large-scale mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2014

Elin C. Maki
Affiliation:
Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 1515 College Ave., Manhattan, Kansas 66502, United States of America
Lee W. Cohnstaedt*
Affiliation:
Center for Grain and Animal Health Research, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 1515 College Ave., Manhattan, Kansas 66502, United States of America
*
Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Sampling a cosmopolitan mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) species throughout its range is logistically challenging and extremely resource intensive. Mosquito control programmes and regional networks operate at the local level and often conduct sampling activities across much of North America. A method for large-scale sampling of two mosquito species using crowdsourcing to network with these local and regional programmes is described. A total of 961 mosquito vector and control districts, health departments, and individual collectors across the United States of America and Canada were contacted in 2011 and 2012 of which 9% positively responded by sending mosquitoes. In total, 1101 unique population samples of Aedes vexans (Meigen) and Culex tarsalis Coquillett were collected throughout their range in these two countries. Aedes vexans outgroup samples were also submitted from Europe and Asia. This is the largest crowd-sourced collection of samples to date.

Type
Techniques – NOTE
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Kateryn Rochon

References

Bennett, K.E., Olson, K.E., De Lourdes Munoz, M., Fernandez-Salas, I., Farfan-ale, J.A., Higgs, S., et al. 2002. Variation in vector competence for Dengue 2 virus among 24 collections of Aedes aegypti from Mexico and the United States. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 61: 8592.Google Scholar
Campbell, G.L., Marfin, A.A., Lanciotti, R.S., and Gubler, D.J. 2002. West Nile virus. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2: 519529.Google Scholar
Catlin-Groves, C.L. 2012. The citizen science landscape: from volunteers to citizen sensors and beyond. International Journal of Zoology, 2012: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, J.L., Zuckerberg, B., and Bonter, D.N. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41: 149172.Google Scholar
Gubler, D.J. 2007. The continuing spread of West Nile virus in the Western Hemisphere. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 45: 10391046.Google Scholar
Schmeller, D.S., Henry, P.Y., Julliard, R., Gruber, B., Clobert, J., Dziock, F., et al. 2008. Advantages of volunteer-based biodiversity monitoring in Europe. Conservation Biology, 23: 307316.Google Scholar
Turell, M.J., Wilson, W.C., and Bennett, K.E. 2010. Potential for North American mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) to transmit Rift Valley fever virus. Journal of Medical Entomology, 47: 884889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaidyanathan, R. and Scott, T.W. 2007. Geographic variation in vector competence for West Nile virus in the Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) complex in California. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Diseases, 7: 193198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed