Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:01:33.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Controlled-Interval Light Trap for Microlepidoptera1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. G. Harcourt
Affiliation:
Crop Insect Section, Entomology Laboratory, Ottawa, Canada
L. M. Cass
Affiliation:
Crop Insect Section, Entomology Laboratory, Ottawa, Canada

Extract

Although many traps have been designed to study the responses of Lepidoptera to light sources of various intensities and qualities (Gui et al., 1942; Taylor and Deay, 1950; Glick and Hollingsworth, 1954; Merkl and Pfrimmer, 1955; Frost, 1957), few have been designed for studies of flight periodicity. The first one designed for the latter purpose was described by Seamans and Gray (1934). It consisted of seven individual collecting units built into one structure, each unit being operated for one hour of the night. Interval light traps subsequently designed by Hutchins (1940), Nagel and Granovsky (1947), and Coon (Frost, 1952) are of the Minnesota type (Frost, 1952), having a lamp bulb, hood, baffle and funnel. Beneath the funnel is a turntable, which brings a series of collecting jars under the spout of the funnel at regulated intervals. The Rothamstead trap (Williams, 1935, 1948) is also based on a bottle-changing mechanism.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Frost, S. W. 1949. The diamondback moth in Pennsylvania. J. Econ. Ent. 42: 681682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, S. W. 1952. Light traps. Pennsylvania Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 550.Google Scholar
Frost, S. W. 1957. The Pennsylvania insect light trap. J. Econ. Ent. 50: 287292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P. A., and Hollingsworth, J. P.. 1954. Response of the pink bollworm moth to certain ultraviolet and visible radiation. J. Econ. Ent. 47: 8186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gui, H. L., Porter, L. C., and Prideaux, C. F.. 1942. Response of insects to color, intensity, and distribution of light. J. Agr. Eng. 23: 5158.Google Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1957. Biology of the diamondback moth, Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), in eastern Ontario. II. Life-history, behaviour, and host relationships. Can. Ent. 89: 554564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, R. E. 1940. Insect activity at a light trap during various periods of the night. J. Econ. Ent. 33: 654657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. 1950. A suction trap for small airborne insects which automatically segregates the catch into successive hourly samples. Ann. Appl. Biol. 37: 8091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkl, M. E., and Pfrimmer, T. R.. 1955. Light trap investigations at Stoneville, Miss., and Tallulah, La., during 1954. J. Econ. Ent. 48: 740741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhern, T. D. 1942. New Jersey mechanical trap for mosquito surveys. New Jersey Agr. Expt. Sta. Cire. 421.Google Scholar
Mulhern, T. D. 1948. A measuring instrument for determining accurately the displacement of air and consequently the mechanical efficiency of the New Jersey mosquito trap. Proc. 35th Ann. Meet. New Jersey Mosq. Exterm. Assoc., pp. 9094.Google Scholar
Nagel, R. H., and Granovsky, A. A.. 1947. A turntable light trap for taking insects over regulated periods. J. Econ. Ent. 40: 583586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamans, H. L., and Gray, H. E.. 1934. Design of a new type of light trap to operate at controlled intervals. 25th and 26th Repts. Quebec Soc. Prot. Plants, 1933–1934. pp. 3946.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. G., and Deay, H. O.. 1950. Electric lamps and traps in corn borer control. Agr. Eng. 31: 503505. 532.Google Scholar