Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:58:45.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT, AND REPRODUCTION IN THE LADYBIRD BEETLE, HIPPODAMIA CONVERGENS (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. P. Gutierrez ,
J. U. Baumgaertner  and
K. S. Hagen
A. P. Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley 94720
J. U. Baumgaertner
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley 94720
K. S. Hagen
Affiliation:
Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple model for growth and development of the ladybird beetle (Hippodamia convergens G-M.) which partitions aphid biomass eaten into components of excretion, assimilation, growth and/or reproduction, and metabolic costs associated with searching and maintenance respiration is reported. All parameters in the model were estimated from simple minimal laboratory experiments, and have biological and/or physical meaning. The effects of predator nutrition on aging, survival, and emigration were also modelled. Most rates in the model for growth, reproduction, and respiration are controlled by the interplay between prey consumption and maximum prey biomass demands. The model for biomass flow is related to standard predator/prey theory.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , January 1981 , pp. 21 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beddington, J. R., Hassell, M. P., and Lawton, J. H.. 1976 a. The components of arthropod predation. II. The predation rate of increase. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddington, J. R., Free, C. A., and Lawton, J. H.. 1976 b. Concepts of stability and resilience in predator-prey models. J. Anim. Ecol. 45: 791–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, G. D. and Dickerson, W. A.. 1972. Life cycle of the convergent lady beetle in relation to temperature. J. econ. Ent. 65: 1508–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. D. and Gilbert, N. E.. 1976. Coccinellids and aphids: A qualitative study of the impact of adult lady birds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on field populations of pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 73: 33–56.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Falcon, L. A., and van den Bosch, R.. 1974. Cotton Production in California - A Simulation in Modelling for Pest Management — Concepts, Techniques and Applications, USA/USSR, Tummula, R. L., Haynes, D. L. and Croft, B. H. (Eds.). pp. 134–145.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Christensen, J. B., Merritt, C. M., Loew, W. B., Summers, C. G., and Cothran, W. R.. 1976. Alfalfa and the Egyptian alfalfa weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Can. Ent. 108: 635–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Falcon, L. A., Loew, W. B., Leipzig, P. A., and van den Bosch, R.. 1975. An analysis of cotton production in California: A model for Acala cotton and the effects of defoliators on its yields. Environ. Ent. 4: 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P. and Wang, Y.. 1976. Applied population ecology: Models for crop production and pest management. In Norton, G. and Holling, C. S. (Eds.), Proceedings of a Conference on Pest Management, 25–29 October 1976, Austria.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Summers, C. G., and Baumgaertner, J.. 1980. The phenology and distribution of aphids in California alfalfa as modified by ladybird beetle predation (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Can. Ent. 112: 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1974. The significance of predaceous Coccinellidae in bioligical and integrated control of insects. Entomophaga Mem. 7: 25–44.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1976. Role of insect nutrition in insect management. Proc. Tall Timbers Conf. on Ecol. Anim. Cont. by Habitat Mngmt. 6.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. and Sluss, R. R.. 1966. Quantity of aphids required for reproduction by Hippodamia spp. in the laboratory. In Hodek, I. (Ed.), Ecology of aphidophagous insects. (Sept. 27-Oct. 1, 1966.) 360 pp.Google Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton Univ. Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 48. 86 pp.Google Scholar
*Lotka, A. J. 1925. Elements of Physical Biology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Mukerji, M. K. and LeRoux, E. J.. 1969. A study on energetics of Podisus maculiventris (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Can. Ent. 101: 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuenschwander, P., Hagen, K. S., and Smith, R. F.. 1975. Predation on aphids in California's alfalfa fields. Hilgardia 43(2): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, A. J. 1933. The balance of animal populations, J. Anim. Ecol. 2: 131–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. 1971. Fundamentals of Ecology (3rd ed.). W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Readshaw, J. L. and Cuff, W. R.. A model of Nicholson's blowfly cycles applied to predation theory. J. Anim. Ecol. (in press).Google Scholar
Rogers, D. J. and Randolph, S. E.. 1978. Metabolic strategies of male and female tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) in the field. Bull. ent. Res. 68: 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royama, T. 1971. A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ., Suppl. 1.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. 1973. Population growth regulation by intraspecific competition for energy or time: Some simple presentations. Theor. Pop. Biol. 4: 56–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamaki, G., McGuire, J. V., and Turner, J. E.. 1974. Predator power and efficacy: A model to evaluate their impact. Environ. Ent. 3: 625–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornley, J. H. L. 1977. Mathematical Models in Plant Physiology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
*Volterra, W. 1926. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d'individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. R. Accad. Naz. dei Lincei 6:(2): 31–113Google Scholar
Von Foerster, H. 1959. Some remarks on changing populations. In Stohlman, F. Jr, (Ed.), The Kinetics of Cellular Proliferation. Grune and Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Gutierrez, A. P., Oster, G., and Daxl, R.. 1977. A population model for cotton growth and development: Coupling cotton–herbivore interaction. Can. Ent. 109: 1359–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegert, R. G. 1976. Benchmark Papers in Ecology. Ecological Energetics. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa. 457 pp.Google Scholar