Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T12:12:55.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPATIBILITY OF 27 CHEMICAL INSECTICIDES WITH BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS VAR. KURSTAKI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

O. N. Morris
O. N. Morris
Affiliation:
Chemical Control Research Institute, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The compatibility of Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) with 27 chemical insecticides representing organophosphorus and carbamate insecticides, pyrethrins, chlordimeform, urea derivative, and antifeedant were studied by way of their effects on germination of the bacterial spores, replication of vegetative cells and spore staining, and refractive index characteristics.

The results showed that: (1) Carbamates were generally more compatible with Bacillus thuringiensis than were the other insecticide groups tested. (2) Technical formulations were less harmful to the bacteria than wettable powders which were less harmful than emulsifiable concentrates. (3) Of the 27 pesticides, those most compatible with B.t. were Orthene®, Dylox®, Lannate®, Sevin®, Zectran®, and Dimilin®. These insecticides are considered recommendable for use in integrated control operations with Bacillus thuringiensis if the target insects are susceptible to them and provided that due regard is given to the environmental implications of their use.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 109 , Issue 6 , June 1977 , pp. 855 - 864
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altahtawy, M. M. and Abaless, I. M.. 1972. Compatibility of the bioinsecticide Thuricide 90TS Flowable with insecticides used in the chemical control of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Bull ent. Soc. Egypt. Econ. Serv. VI: 239–245.Google Scholar
Benz, G. 1971. Synergism of micro-organisms and chemical insecticides. In Burgess, H. D. and Hussey, N. W. (Eds.), Microbial control of insects and mites, pp. 327–355. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Chen, K., Funke, B. R., Schulz, J. T., Carlson, R. B., and Proshold, F. I.. 1974. Effect of certain organophosphate and carbamate insecticides on Bacillus thuringiensis. J. econ. Ent. 67: 471–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, E. M., Reichelderfer, C. F., and Faust, R. M.. 1971. Sensitivity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis to various insecticides and herbicides. J. invert. Path. 17: 292–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, R. F. and Sommers, L. E.. 1968. Plate dilution frequency technique for assay of microbial ecology. Appl. Microbiol. 16: 330–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herfs, von Walter. 1965. Die vertraglichkeit von Bacillus thuringiensis — Preparation mit chemischen Pflanzenchutzmitteln und beinstoffen. Zeit fur Pflanzenkrankheiten. Pflanz. Pflanzenschutz 72: 584–599.Google Scholar
MacRae, I. C. and Celo, J. S.. 1974. The effect of organophosphorus pesticides on the respiration of Azotobacter vinelandii. Soil Biol. Biochem. 6: 109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyamoto, J., Kitigawa, K., and Sato, Y.. 1966. Metabolism of organophosphorous insecticides by Bacillus subtilis with special emphasis on sumithion. Jap. J. exp. Med. 36: 211–225.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1969. Susceptibility of several forest insects of British Columbia to commercially produced Bacillus thuringiensis. 1. Studies on the physiological properties of some commercial products. J. invert. Path. 13: 134–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1972. Susceptibility of some forest insects to mixtures of commercial Bacillus thuringiensis and chemical insecticides, and sensitivity of the pathogen to the insecticides. Can. Ent. 104: 1419–1425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1975. Effect of some chemical insecticides on the germination and replication of commercial Bacillus thuringiensis. J. invert. Path. 26: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, O. N. and Armstrong, J. A.. 1975. Preliminary field trials with Bacillus thuringiensis — chemical insecticide combinations in the integrated control of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 107: 1281–1888.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N., Armstrong, J. A., and Hildebrand, M. J.. 1975. Laboratory tests and field trials of low volume aerial applications of Bacillus thuringiensis — Orthene® combinations against the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem). Env. Canada, Rep. Chem. Control Res. Inst. CC-X-110.Google Scholar
Pristavko, W. P. 1967. On the use of Bacillus thuringiensis -- insecticide combinations to control insect pests. Proc. Int. Coll. Insect Pathol. Microbial Control Wageningen, The Netherlands, Sept. 5–10; 1966.Google Scholar
Reese, E. T. and Maguire, A.. 1969. Surfactants as stimulants of enzyme production by microorganisms. App. Microbiol. 17: 242–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rode, L. J. and Foster, J. W.. 1960. The action of surfactants on bacterial spores. Arch. Mikrobiol. 36: 67–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smirnoff, W. A. 1962. A staining technique for differentiating spores, crystals and cells of Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Insect Path. 4: 384–386.Google Scholar
Steinhaus, E. A. 1956. Potentialities for microbial control of insects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 4: 676–680.Google Scholar
Sutter, G. R., Abrahamson, A. D., Hamilton, E. W., and Bick, I. D.. 1971. Compatibility of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis and chemical insecticides I. Effect of insecticides on bacterial replication rate. J. econ. Ent. 64: 1348–1350.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. W., Widdus, R., and Rees, J. S.. 1971. Effects of organochlorine insecticides on bacterial growth, respiration and viability. J. gen. Microbiol. 69: 1–13.Google Scholar