Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:12:01.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comparison of Radiograph Analysis and Bark Dissection in Estimating Numbers of Western Pine Beetle1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. J. DeMars Jr.
Affiliation:
Agriculture Experiment Station, University of California, Berkeley, California

Abstract

Estimates of the numbers of the western pine beetle, Dendroctonus brevicomis LeConte, in Pinus ponderosa Laws, bark samples were made by radiographs of 25 bark samples and by dissection counts of the bark. High correlations (r = >.9) between the two methods were found for (a) live larvae, (b) live plus dead larvae, (c) live of all stages combined, and (d) live plus dead of all stages combined. The bark dissection method took eight times as long and was 4⅓ times as expensive as the radiographic interpretation method of estimating bark beetle numbers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berryman, A. A. 1961. Radiographic techniques for the detection, sampling and biological studies of forest insects. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Calif., Berkeley. 40 pp., illus.Google Scholar
Berryman, A. A., and Stark, R. W.. 1962. Radiography in forest entomology. Ann. Ent. Soc. Amer. 55: 456466, illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, A. L. 1946. Statistical analysis. Rinehart and Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. E., and Molatore, H. D.. 1961. X-ray detection of Douglas-fir beetles reared in slabs. Canad. Ent. 93: 928931, illus.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. M., and Keen, F. P.. 1960. Biology and control of the western pine beetle. U.S. Dept. Agr. Misc. Publ. 800, 381 pp., illus.Google Scholar