Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:55:10.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTENNAL SENSE ORGANS OF FEMALE CULICINE MOSQUITOES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Susan B. McIver
Susan B. McIver
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, School of Hygiene, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The type, number, and distribution of the antennal sense organs of female Culex territans Walker and Culex restuans (Theo.) were determined and compared to similar data on Culex pipiens L., Culex fatigans Wiedemann, and Culex tarsalis Coquillett. All types of sense organs have similar distribution patterns on the five species, but large differences in number occur. These differences are discussed with regard to the host preference of the mosquitoes.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 102 , Issue 10 , October 1970 , pp. 1258 - 1267
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bar-Zeev, M. 1960. The location of hygroreceptors and moisture receptors in Aedes aegypti (L.). Ent. exp. appl. 3: 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, R. 1960. Variations in human body odour as a cause of individual differences of attraction for malaria mosquitoes. Trop. geogr. Med. 12: 186–192.Google Scholar
*Coluzzi, M. 1964. Morphological divergences in the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex (unpublished working document WHO/Ma1/456).Google Scholar
Crans, W. J. 1964. Continued host preference studies with New Jersey mosquitoes, 1963. Proc. 51st Ann. Meet. N.J. Exterm. Ass., pp. 50–58.Google Scholar
Freyvogel, T. A. 1961. Ein Beitrag zu den Problemen um die Blutmahlzeit von Stechmücken. Acta trop. 18: 201–251.Google Scholar
Gebhardt, L. P., Stanton, G. J., Hill, D. W., and Collett, G. C.. 1964. Natural overwintering hosts of the virus of western equine encephalitis. New Engl. J. Med. 271: 172–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, R. O. 1961. Host preferences of Culiseta melanura and allied mosquitoes. Mosquito News 21: 179–187.Google Scholar
Henderson, B. E., and Senior, L.. 1961. Attack rate of Culex tarsalis on reptiles, amphibians, and small mammals. Mosquito News 21: 29–32.Google Scholar
Humason, G. L. 1967. Animal tissue techniques. Freeman, San Francisco and London.Google Scholar
Ismail, I. A. H. 1962. Sense organs in the antennae of Anopheles maculipennis atroparvus (v. Theil) and their possible function in relation to the attraction of female mosquito to man. Acta trop. 19: 1–58.Google Scholar
Ismail, I. A. H. 1964. Comparative study of sense organs in the antennae of culicine and anopheline female mosquitoes. Acta trop. 21: 155–168.Google ScholarPubMed
Ismail, I. A. H., and Hammoud, E. I.. 1968. The use of coeloconic sensillae on the female antenna in differentiating the members of the Anopheles gambiae Giles complex. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 38: 814–821.Google ScholarPubMed
Kellogg, F. E. 1970. Water vapor and carbon dioxide receptors in Aedes aegypti (L.). J. Insect Physiol. 16: 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, A. A., et al. 1967. Comparison of the attractiveness of the human palm and other stimuli to the yellow-fewer mosquito. J. econ. Ent. 60: 318–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacher, V. 1967. Elektrophysiologische Untersuchungen an Einzelnen Geruchsrezeptoren auf den Antennen Weiblicher Moskitos (Aedes aegypti L.). J. Insect Physiol. 13: 1461–1470.Google Scholar
Maibach, H. I., Khan, A. A., and Strauss, W. G.. 1966 a. Attraction of different age groups to mosquitoes. J. econ. Ent. 59: 1302–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maibach, H. I., Khan, A. A., and Strauss, W. G.. 1966 a. Attraction of different age groups to mosquitoes. J. econ. Ent. 59: 1302–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIver, S. B. 1968. Host preferences and discrimination by the mosquitoes Aedes aegypti and Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae). J. med. Ent. 5: 422–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIver, S. B. 1969. Antenna1 sense organs of female Culex tarsalis. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 62: 1455–1461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIver, S. B., and Charlton, C. C.. 1970. Studies on the sense organs on the palps of selected culecine mosquitoes. Can. J. Zool. 48: 293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Means, R. G. and Charlton, C. C. 1965. Culex territans Walker biting man in nature. Mosquito News 25: 489.Google Scholar
Means, R. G. 1968. Host preferences of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Suffolk County, New York. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 116–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphey, F. J., Burbutis, P. P., and Bray, D. F.. 1967. Bionomics of Culex salinarius Coquillett. II: Host acceptance and feeding by adult females of C. salinarius and other mosquito species. Mosquito News 27: 366–374.Google Scholar
Rahm, U. 1958 a. Die attraktive Wirkung der vom Menschen abgegebenen Duftstoffe auf Aedes aegypti L. Z. Tropenmed. Parasit. 9: 146–156.Google ScholarPubMed
Rahm, U. 1958 b. Die Funktion der Antennen, Palpen, und Tarsen von Aedes aegypti L. beim Aufsuchen des Wirtes. Revue suisse Zool. 65: 779–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, W. C., 1951. Field studies on carbon dioxide as a possible host stimulant to mosquitoes. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 77: 64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, W. C. 1953. Quantitative field studies on a carbon dioxide chemotropism of mosquitoes. Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 2: 325–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reeves, W. C., and Hammon, W. McD.. 1944. Feeding habits of the proven and possible mosquito vectors of western equine and St. Louis encephalitis in the Yakima Valley, Washington. Am. J. trop. Med. 24: 131–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roessler, P. 1963. The attractiveness of steroids and aminoacids to female Aedes aegypti. Proc. 50th Ann. Meet. N.J. Exterm. Ass., p. 250.Google Scholar
Roth, L. M. 1951. Loci of sensory end-organs used by mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti (L.) and Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say) in receiving host stimuli. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 44: 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, L. M., and Willis, E. R.. 1952. Possible hygroreceptors in Aedes aegypti (L.) and Blattela germanica (L.). J. Morph. 91: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slifer, E. H., and Brescia, V. T.. 1960. Permeable sense organs on the antenna of the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). Ent. News 71: 220–225.Google Scholar
Slifer, E. H., and Sekhon, S. S.. 1962. The fine structure of the sense organs on the antennae flagellum of the yellow-fever mosquito Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). J. Morph. 111: 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steward, C. C., and Atwood, C. E.. 1963. The sensory organs of mosquito antennae. Can. J. Zool. 41: 577–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tempelis, C. H., and Reeves, W. C.. 1964. Feeding habits of one anopheline and three culicine mosquitoes by the precipitin test. J. med. Ent. 1: 148–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tempelis, C. H., and Washino, R. K.. 1967. Host-feeding patterns of Culex tarsalis in the Sacramento Valley, California, with notes on other species. J. med. Ent. 4: 315–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed