Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:55:15.682Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biology of Pissodes terminalis Hopping (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in California1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. W. Stark  and
D. L. Wood
R. W. Stark
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley
D. L. Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pissodes terminalis Hopping attacks the terminal leaders of jack pine and at least two of the four geographic subspecies of lodgepole pine. The development on Pinus contorta murrayana in central California is described and compared with the development on jack pine in Canada. The oviposition period is synchronized with leader elongation, early spring to mid-summer. Feeding of the first three instars is in the phloem-cambial region and the fourth (last) instar is found in the pith. Part of the population completes development in late summer; adults emerge and presumably overwinter in the ground. The balance overwinter usually as mature larvae and occasionally as pupae, completing their development in the spring.

Mortality is high and is caused by feeding of associated insects, possibly resin flow, high parasitism and other unknown factors. Seven parasite species from five families were reared.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 96 , Issue 9 , September 1964 , pp. 1208 - 1218
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belyea, R. M., and Sullivan, C. R.. 1956. The white pine weevil: A review of current knowledge. For. Chron. 32: 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. C. 1958. Insect problems in forest plantations in northeastern United States. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent., Montreal (1956) 4: 247–250.Google Scholar
Craighead, F. C. et al. , 1950. Insect enemies of eastern forests. Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric. 657, 679 pp.Google Scholar
Critchfield, W. B. 1957. Geographic variation in Pinus contorta. Publ. Maria Moors Cabot Foundation, Harvard Univ., Camb., Mass. No. 3, 118 pp.Google Scholar
Dietrich, H. 1931. Synonymy and notes on the pissodes weevil attacking Cedrus deodarae. J. econ. Ent. 24: 872–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drouin, J. A., Sullivan, C. R. and Smith, S. G.. 1963. Occurrence of Pissodes terminalis Hopping (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Canada: Life history, behavior and cytogenetic identification. Canad. Ent. 95: 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, C. B. 1964. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Pacif. Southwest For. & Range Exp. Sta. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. J. 1958. The pine weevil, Pissodes approximatus Hopkins in southern Ontario. Canad. Ent. 90: 348–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furniss, R. L. 1963. Pacif. Northwest For. & Range Exp. Sta., U.S. For. Serv. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Graham, K. 1951. The Sitka spruce weevil. Bi-m. Progr. Rep. Can. Dep. Agric. 7(5): 3–4.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1911. Contributions toward a monograph of the bark-weevils of the genus Pissodes. U.S. Dep. Agric. Bur. Ent. Tech. Ser. 20, Pt. 1, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Hopping, G. R. 1962. In Lodgepole pine in Alberta. Bull. Dep. For. 127, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Hopping, R. 1920. A new species of the genus Pissodes (Coleoptera). Canad. Ent. 52: 132–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaynes, H. A., and MacAloney, H. J.. 1958. White pine weevil. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Service, For. Pest Leafl. 21, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Keen, F. P. 1928. Insect enemies of California pines and their control. Bull. Div. For., Calif. Dep. nat. Resources 7, 113 pp.Google Scholar
Manna, G. K., and Smith, S. G.. 1958. Chromosomal polymorphism and interrelationships among bark weevils of the genus Pissodes Germar. The Nucleus 2: 179–208.Google Scholar
Peterson, L. O. T. 1945. The Engelmann spruce weevil. Bi-m. Progr. Rep. Can. Dep. Agric. 1(6): 3.Google Scholar
Salman, K. A. 1935. The effects of attack by Pissodes terminalis Hopping in lodgepole pine in California. J. econ. Ent. 28: 496–497.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. E. 1963. Insects associated with the Engelmann spruce weevil, Pissodes engelmanni Hopkins. Bi-m. Progr. Rep. Can. Dep. For. 19(5): 2–3.Google Scholar
Stevenson, R. E. 1964. Can. Dep. For., Forestry Entomology and Pathology Branch, Calgary, Alberta. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Steinhaus, E. A. 1963. University of California, Irvine. Personal communication.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. L. 1929. The biology of the white-pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Peck) and a study of its insect parasites from an economic viewpoint. Ent. Amer. 9: 167–246; 10: 1–86.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E. 1962. Uninjured trees – a meaningful guide to white-pine weevil control decisions. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv., Northeastern For. Exp. Sta., For. Res. Note 129, 4 pp.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E., McIntyre, T. and Crosby, D.. 1955. Loss in volume of white pine in New Hampshire caused by the white-pine weevil. J. For. 53: 271–274.Google Scholar
Wright, K. H. 1960. The Sitka-spruce weevil. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Service, For. Pest Leafl. 47, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Wright, K. H., and Baisinger, D. H.. 1956. The Sitka-spruce weevil. Proc. Soc. Amer. For. (1955): 64–67.Google Scholar