Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:30:08.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioclimatic analyses for the distributions of Onthophagus nuchicornis, Onthophagus taurus, and Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2017

K.D. Floate Open the ORCID record for K.D. Floate [Opens in a new window] ,
D.W. Watson ,
R.M. Weiss  and
O. Olfert
K.D. Floate*
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, Alberta, T1J 4B1, Canada
D.W. Watson
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 27695-7626, United States of America
R.M. Weiss
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
O. Olfert
Affiliation:
Saskatoon Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0X2, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Onthophagus nuchicornis (Linnaeus), Onthophagus taurus (Schreber), and Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Onthophagini) are species of dung beetles that have been used in relocation programmes to accelerate the degradation of cattle dung on pastures. Exotic in North America, all three species have expanded their distributions since their introduction onto the continent. Here we report development of CLIMEX® bioclimatic models using data collected before 2011 that predict the eventual North American distributions of these species. Data collected after 2010 is used to validate these models. Model outputs identify large regions of the central United States of America suitable for establishment of O. nuchicornis and O. taurus where these species have not been reported. These results indicate that the latter two species may already be present in these regions and undetected, that they have yet to expand into these regions, and (or) that factors restricting migration or dispersal prevent these species from occupying these areas. Model outputs for D. gazella suggest that the species has largely reached its predicted maximum distribution. These models can be used to aid the success of future relocation programmes elsewhere in the world and (or) to predict regions where these species are likely to spread without human intervention.

Type
Biodiversity & Evolution
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 149 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 504 - 524
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2017. Parts of this are a work of Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Andrew Smith

References

Anderson, J.R., Merritt, R.W., and Loomis, E.C. 1984. The insect-free cattle dropping and its relationship to increased dung fouling of rangeland pastures. Journal of Economic Entomology, 77: 133–141.Google Scholar
Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L.C. 1954. The distribution and abundance of animals. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1910. Report of the Entomologist. Hawaii Board of Commissioners of Agriculture and Forestry, Division of Forestry, Hawaiian Gazette Company, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America.Google Scholar
Bertone, M., Green, J., Washburn, S., Poore, M., Sorenson, C., and Watson, D.W. 2005. Seasonal activity and species composition of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae) inhabiting cattle pastures in North Carolina. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 98: 309–321.Google Scholar
Bianchin, I., Alves, R.G.O., and Koller, W.W. 1998. Efeito de carrapaticidas/inseticidas “pour-on” sobre adultos do besouro coprófago africano Onthophagus gazella Fabr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, 27: 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bistrom, O., Silfverberg, H., and Rutanen, I. 1991. Abundance and distribution of coprophilous Histerini (Histeridae) and Onthophagus and Aphodius (Scarabaeidae) in Finland (Coleoptera). Entomologica Fennica, 2: 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, R.R. and Aga, A. 1975. Onthophagus gazella: mass rearing and laboratory biology. Environmental Entomology, 4: 735–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, R.D. 2005. Observations of urban dung beetles utilizing dog feces (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 59: 400–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coope, G.R. 2000. The climatic significance of coleopteran assemblages from the Eemian deposits in southern England. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 79: 257–267.Google Scholar
Dortel, E., Thuiller, W., Lobo, J.M., Bohbot, H., Lumaret, J.P., and Jay-Robert, P. 2013. Potential effects of climate change on the distribution of Scarabaeidae dung beetles in western Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation, 17: 1059–1070.Google Scholar
Duncan, R.P., Cassey, P., and Blackburn, T.M. 2009. Do climate envelope models transfer? A manipulative test using dung beetle introductions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276: 1449–1457.Google Scholar
Edwards, P. 2007. Introduced dung beetles in Australia 1967–2007: current status and future directions. Dung Beetles for Landcare Farming Committee, Sinnamon Park, Australia.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Authority. 2011. Environmental risk management authority decision: application ERMA200599. Environmental Protection Authority, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Fincher, G.T. 1981. The potential value of dung beetles in pasture ecosystems. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society, 16: 316–333.Google Scholar
Fincher, G.T. and Hunter, J.S. 1989. Overwintering studies on Onthophagus gazella (F.) and Onthophagus bonasus (F.) in two different textural classes of soil in east-central Texas, United States of America. Southwestern Entomologist, 14: 133–138.Google Scholar
Fincher, G.T., Stewart, T.B., and Hunter, J.S.I. 1983. The 1981 distribution of Onthophagus gazella Fabricius from releases in Texas and Onthophagus taurus Schreber from an unknown release in Florida (Coleoptera:Scarabaeidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 37: 159–163.Google Scholar
Fincher, G.T. and Woodruff, R.E. 1975. A European dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus Schreber, new to the U.S. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 29: 349–350.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D. 2011. Arthropods in cattle dung on Canada’s grasslands. In Arthropods of Canadian grasslands. Volume 2. Inhabitants of a changing landscape. Edited by K. D. Floate. Biological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Pp. 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D. and Gill, B.D. 1998. Seasonal activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) associated with cattle dung in southern Alberta and their geographic distribution in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 130: 131–151.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D. and Kadiri, N. 2013. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) associated with cattle dung on native grasslands of southern Alberta, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 145: 647–654.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D., Watson, D.W., Coghlin, P., and Olfert, O. 2015. Degree-day models for development of the dung beetles Onthophagus nuchicornis, O. taurus, and Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), and the likelihood of O. taurus establishment in southern Alberta, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 147: 617–627.Google Scholar
Génier, F. and Davis, A.L.V. 2017. Digitonthophagus gazella auctorum: an unfortunate case of mistaken identity for a widely introduced species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Onthophagini). Zootaxa, 4221: 497–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Génier, F. and Moretto, P. 2017. Digitonthophagus Balthasar, 1959: taxonomy, systematics, and morphological phylogeny of the genus revealing an African species complex (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Zootaxa, 4248: 1–110.Google Scholar
Global Biodiversity Information Facility. 2016. Global Biodiversity Information Facility [online] Available from www.gbif.org [accessed 31 January 2015].Google Scholar
Harris, R.L., Onaga, K., Blume, R.R., Roth, J.P., and Summerlin, J.W. 1982. Survey of beneficial insects in undisturbed cattle droppings on Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 24: 91–95.Google Scholar
Hoebeke, E.R. and Beucke, K. 1997. Adventive Onthophagus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in North America: geographic ranges, diagnoses, and new distributional records. Entomological News, 108: 345–362.Google Scholar
Howden, H.F. and Scholtz, C.H. 1986. Changes in a Texas dung beetle community between 1975 and 1985 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Scarabaeinae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 40: 313–316.Google Scholar
Ivie, M.A. and Philips, T.K. 2008. Three new species of Canthonella Chapin from Hispaniola, with new records and nomenclatural changes for West Indian dung beetles. Zootaxa, 1704: 1–14.Google Scholar
Kadiri, N., Lumaret, J.-P., and Floate, K.D. 2014. Functional diversity and seasonal activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) on native grasslands in southern Alberta, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 146: 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, P.E. and Wood, L.A. 2012. Indigenous and exotic dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae) collected in Florida cattle pastures. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 105: 225–231.Google Scholar
Kearney, M. and Porter, W. 2009. Mechanistic niche modelling: combining physiological and spatial data to predict species’ ranges. Ecology Letters, 12: 334–350.Google Scholar
Kriska, N.A. and Young, D.K. 2002. An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera). Insecta Mundi, 16: 31–48.Google Scholar
Kriticos, D.J., Maywald, G.F., Yonow, T., Zurcher, E.J., Herrmann, N.I., and Sutherst, R.W. 2015. Exploring the effects of climate on plants, animals and diseases. CLIMEX version 4 – user guide, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Kriticos, D.J., Webber, B.L., Leriche, A., Ota, N., Macadam, I., Bathols, J., and Scott, J.K. 2012. CliMond: global high-resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lancaster, J.L. and Hunter, J.S. 1978. Introducing dung beetles as an aid in manure disposal and fly control. Arkansas Farm Research, 27: 4.Google Scholar
Lastro, E. 2006. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae) in North Carolina pasture ecosystem. MSc thesis. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Legner, E.F. 1986. The requirement for reassessment of interactions among dung beetles, symbovine flies, and natural enemies. Entomological Society of America, 61: 120–131.Google Scholar
Legner, E.F. and Warkentin, R. 1991. Influence of Onthophagus gazella on hornfly, Haematobia irritans density in irrigated pastures. Entomophaga, 36: 547–553.Google Scholar
Ljungberg, H. 2002. Notes on North European Onthophagus Latr. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Entomologisk Tidskrift, 123: 35–49.Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M., Cabrero-Sañudo, F., Samper, J.R., Ruiz, J.L., Muñoz, J.H., Dellacasa, M., and Dellacasa, G. 2016. Información taxonómica y biogeográfica sobre los Scarabaeoidea coprófagos de Marruecos. [online] Available from www.biogeografia.org/biogeografia/index.php/proyecto-instituto-de-estudios-ceuties [accessed 31 January 2015].Google Scholar
Lobo, J.M. and Martín-Piera, F. 1991. La creación de un banco de datos zoológico sobre los Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea) Ibero-Baleares: una experiencia piloto. Elytron, 5: 31–37.Google Scholar
Macagno, A.L.M., Moczek, A.P., and Pizzo, A. 2016. Rapid divergence of nesting depth and digging appendages among tunneling dung beetle populations and species. The American Naturalist, 187: E143–E151.Google Scholar
MacRae, T.C. and Penn, S.R. 2001. Additional records of adventive Onthophagus Latreille (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in North America. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 55: 49–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markin, G. and Yoshioka, E.R. 1998. Biological control of the horn fly, Haematobia irritans L., in Hawaii (Diptera: Muscidae). Proceedings of the Hawaiian Entomological Society, 33: 43–50.Google Scholar
Mason, P.G., Olfert, O., Sluchinski, L., Weiss, R.M., Boudreault, C., Grossrieder, M., and Kuhlmann, U. 2003. Actual and potential distribution of an invasive canola pest, Meligethes viridescens (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae), in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 135: 405–413.Google Scholar
Montes de Oca, E. and Halffter, G. 1998. Invasion of Mexico by two dung beetles previously introduced into the United States. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 33: 37–45.Google Scholar
Nichols, E., Spector, S., Louzada, J., Larsen, T., Amequita, S., and Favila, M.E. 2008. Ecological functions and ecosystem services provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biological Conservation, 141: 1461–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noriega, J.A., Horgan, F.G., Larsen, T.H., and Valencia, G. 2010. Records of an invasive dung beetle species, Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), in Peru. Acta Zoológica Mexicana, 26: 451–456.Google Scholar
Olfert, O., Hallett, R., Weiss, R.M., Soroka, J., and Goodfellow, S. 2006. Potential distribution and relative abundance of swede midge, Contarinia nasturtii, an invasive pest in Canada. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 120: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olfert, O., Haye, T., Weiss, R., Kriticos, D., and Kuhlmann, U. 2016a. Modelling the potential impact of climate change on future spatial and temporal patterns of biological control agents: Peristenus digoneutis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a case study. The Canadian Entomologist, 158: 579–594.Google Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., Cárcamo, H.A., and Meers, S. 2012a. The influence of abiotic factors on an invasive pest of pulse crops, Sitona lineatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), in North America. Psyche, Article 746342. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/746342.Google Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., and Elliott, R.H. 2016b. Bioclimatic approach to assessing the potential impact of climate change on wheat midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in North America. The Canadian Entomologist, 148: 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., Turkington, K., Beckie, H., and Kriticos, D. 2012b. Bioclimatic approach to assessing the potential impact of climate change on representative crop pests in North America. In Climate change and the Canadian agricultural environment. Edited by A.J.A. Ivany and R.E. Blackshaw. Canadian Weed Science Society, Pinawa, Manitoba, Canada. Pp. 47–69.Google Scholar
Olfert, O., Weiss, R.M., Woods, S., Philip, H., and Dosdall, L. 2004. Potential distribution and relative abundance of an invasive cereal crop pest, Oulema melanopus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 136: 277–287.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, B. and Paulsen, M.J. 2008. The scarabaeoid beetles of Nebraska (Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidea). Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State. Museum, 22: 1–568.Google Scholar
Rivera-Cervantes, L.E. and Garcia-Real, E. 1991. New locality records for Onthophagus gazella Fabricius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Jalisco, Mexico. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 45: 370.Google Scholar
Rounds, R.J. and Floate, K.D. 2012. Diversity and seasonal phenology of coprophagous beetles at Lake City, Michigan, United States of America, with a new state record for Onthophagus taurus (Schreber) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 66: 169–172.Google Scholar
Silva, D.P., Vilela, B., Buzatto, B.A., Moczek, A.P., and Hortal, J. 2016. Contextualized niche shifts upon independent invasions by the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus . Biological Invasions, 18: 3137–3148.Google Scholar
Skidmore, P. 1991. Insects of the British cow-dung community. Richmond Publishing, Slough, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Sullivan, G.T., Ozman-Sullivan, S.K., Lumaret, J.-P., Baxter, G., Zalucki, M.P., and Zeybekoğlu, Ü. 2016. Dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) utilizing water buffalo dung on the Black Sea coast of Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 40: 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherst, R.W., Maywald, G.F., and Kriticos, D.J. 2007. CLIMEX version 3: user’s guide. Hearne Scientific Software, South Yarra, Australia.Google Scholar
Tinerella, P.P. and Fauske, G.M. 1999. Occurrence of Onthophagus nuchicornis (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in North Dakota. Entomological News, 110: 22–26.Google Scholar
Tyndale-Biscoe, M. 1990. Common dung beetles in pastures of south-eastern Australia. Division of Entomology, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Worthington, R.J. and Larsen, K.J. 2010. An annotated checklist of scarab beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from northeastern Iowa. The Great Lakes Entomologist, 43: 77–90.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Floate supplementary material

Floate supplementary material 1

Download Floate supplementary material(File)
File 584.7 KB