Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:00:32.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of artificial nests for cavity-nesting bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in lowbush blueberry (Ericaceae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2018

Robyn S. McCallum ,
Nancy L. McLean  and
G. Christopher Cutler
Robyn S. McCallum*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, 62 Cumming Drive, Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 5E3, Canada
Nancy L. McLean
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, 62 Cumming Drive, Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 5E3, Canada
G. Christopher Cutler
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, 62 Cumming Drive, Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 5E3, Canada
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fluctuating bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) populations jeopardise pollination services. Nesting habitat for solitary bees is potentially limited in many agroecosystems, but the provision of artificial nests could augment bee communities and the pollination services they provide. We investigated whether cavity-nesting bees (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton (Ericaceae)) fields would use artificial trap nests. Different nest designs were compared, as was nesting occupancy between fruit-bearing and vegetative fields. Milk carton nests had significantly more uptake by and emergence of Osmia Panzer and Megachile Latreille than wooden nests. Only 3% of wooden nests had at least one occupied nesting tube versus 73% of milk carton nests, with a total of 34% nesting tubes occupied. Bee emergence was significantly higher in nesting tubes from fruit-bearing fields than vegetative fields. Osmia and Megachile emergence was low from milk carton nests, with bees emerging from less than 10% of occupied nesting tubes, in large part due to parasitism. Overturned clay lids were tested as potential nesting sites for Osmia inermis Zetterstedt, but only 3% of lids had nesting evidence. Our results suggest that certain artificial nests have potential for encouraging communities of cavity-nesting bees, but further study on nest design and handling protocols is needed.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 150 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 802 - 812
Copyright
© 2018 Entomological Society of Canada 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Cécile Le Lann.

References

Aras, P., De Oliveira, D., and Savoie, L. 1996. Effect of a honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) gradient on the pollination and yield of lowbush blueberry. Journal of Economic Entomology, 89: 1080–1083.Google Scholar
Artz, D.R., Allan, M.J., Wardell, G.I., and Pitts-Singer, T.L. 2014. Influence of nest box color and release sites on Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) reproductive success in a commercial almond orchard. Journal of Economic Entomology, 107: 2045–2054.Google Scholar
Blaauw, B.R. and Isaacs, R. 2014. Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and the pollination services provided to a pollination-dependent crop. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51: 890–898.Google Scholar
Bohart, R.M. and Kimsey, L.S. 1980. A generic synopsis of the Chrysididae of America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 53: 137–148.Google Scholar
Bosch, J. and Kemp, W.P. 2000. Development and emergence of the orchard pollinator Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Environmental Entomology, 29: 8–13.Google Scholar
Bosch, J. and Kemp, W.P. 2002. Developing and establishing bee species as crop pollinators: the example of Osmia spp. (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and fruit trees. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 92: 3–16.Google Scholar
Bushmann, S.L. and Drummond, F.A. 2015. Abundance and diversity of wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) found in lowbush blueberry growing regions of Downeast Maine. Environmental Entomology, 44: 975–989.Google Scholar
Cane, J.H., Griswold, T., and Parker, F.D. 2007. Substrates and materials used for nesting by North American Osmia bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes: Megachilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 100: 350–358.Google Scholar
Cutler, G.C., Nams, V.O., Craig, P., Sproule, J.M., and Sheffield, C.S. 2015. Wild bee pollinator communities of lowbush blueberry fields: spatial and temporal trends. Basic and Applied Ecology, 16: 73–85.Google Scholar
Drummond, F.A. and Stubbs, C.S. 1997. Potential for management of the blueberry bee, Osmia atriventris Cresson. Acta Horticulturae, 446: 77–85.Google Scholar
Eaton, L.J. and Murray, J.E. 1997. Relationships of pollinator numbers in blueberry fields to fruit development and yields. Acta Horticulturae, 446: 181–188.Google Scholar
Eaton, L.J. and Nams, V.O. 2012. Honey bee stocking numbers and wild blueberry production in Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 92: 1303–1310.Google Scholar
Frankie, G.W., Thorp, R.W., Newstrom-LLoyd, L.E., Rizzardi, M.A., Barthell, J.F., Griswold, T.L., et al. 1998. Monitoring solitary bees in modified wildland habitats: implications for bee ecology and conservation. Environmental Entomology, 27: 1137–1148.Google Scholar
Fye, R.E. 1965. The biology of Apoidea taken in trap nests in northwestern Ontario (Hymenoptera). The Canadian Entomologist, 97: 863–877.Google Scholar
Gardner, J.D. and Spivak, M. 2014. A survey and historical comparison of the Megachilidae (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in Itasca State Park, Minnesota. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 107: 983–993.Google Scholar
Gathmann, A. and Tscharntke, T. 2002. Foraging ranges of solitary bees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 71: 757–764.Google Scholar
Goulet, H. and Huber, J.T. 1993. Hymenoptera of the world: an identification guide to families. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Government of Canada. 2016. Canadian climate normals 1981–2010 station data [online]. Available from http://climate.weather.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_1981_2010_e.html?stnID=6358&autofwd=1 [accessed 21 November 2016].Google Scholar
Guisse, J.K. and Miller, D.G. 2011. Distribution and habitat preferences of Osmia lignaria (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and associated cavity-nesting insects in California’s Sierra Nevada foothills adjacent to the Sacramento Valley. Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 87: 188–195.Google Scholar
Hicks, B. 2009. Observations of the nest structure of Osmia inermis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) from Newfoundland, Canada. Journal of the Acadian Entomological Society, 5: 12–18.Google Scholar
Inouye, B.D. 1990. Use of visual and olfactory cues for individual nest hole recognition by the solitary bee Epicharis metatarsalis (Apidae, Anthophorinae). Journal of Insect Behaviour, 13: 231–238.Google Scholar
Javorek, S.K., MacKenzie, K.E., and Vander Kloet, S.P. 2002. Comparative pollination effectiveness among bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) on lowbush blueberry (Ericaceae: Vaccinium angustifolium). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 95: 345–351.Google Scholar
MacIvor, J.S. 2016. Cavity-nest boxes for solitary bees: a century of design and research. Apidologie, 48: 1–17.Google Scholar
MacIvor, J.S. and Packer, L. 2015. “Bee hotels” as tools for native pollinator conservation: a premature verdict? Public Library of Science One, 10: e0122126.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R., and Wood, D.M. 1987. Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Medler, J.T. 1967. Biology of Osmia in trap nests in Wisconsin (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 60: 338–344.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T.B. 1962. Bees of the eastern United States. II. Technical Bulletin (North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station), 152: 1–557. Available from https://projects.ncsu.edu/cals/entomology/museum/easternBees.php [accessed 13 August 2018].Google Scholar
Packer, L., Genaro, J.A., and Sheffield, C.S. 2007. The bee genera of eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Arthopod Identification, 3: 1–32.Google Scholar
Pitts-Singer, T.L. and James, R.R. 2008. Do weather conditions correlate with findings in failed, provision-filled nest cells of Megachile rotundata (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in western North America? Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 674–685.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 2014. SAS/STAT 9.4 user’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Sheffield, C.S., Kevan, P.G., Pindar, A., and Packer, L. 2013. Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) diversity within apple orchards and old fields in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 145: 94–114.Google Scholar
Sheffield, C.S., Kevan, P.G., and Smith, R.F. 2003. Bee species of Nova Scotia, Canada, with new records and notes on bionomics and floral relations (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 76: 357–384.Google Scholar
Sheffield, C.S., Kevan, P.G., Westby, S.M., and Smith, R.F. 2008. Diversity of cavity-nesting bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) within apple orchards and wild habitats in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 140: 235–249.Google Scholar
Sheffield, C.S., Wilkes, M.A., Cutler, G.C., and Hermanutz, L. 2014. An artificial nesting substrate for Osmia species that nest under stones, with focus on Osmia inermis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae). Insect Conservation and Diversity, 8: 189–192.Google Scholar
Stubbs, C.S., Drummond, F.A., and Algard, S.L. 1997. Bee conservation and increasing Osmia spp. in Maine lowbush blueberry fields. Northeastern Naturalist, 4: 133–144.Google Scholar
Taki, H., Boone, J.W., Viana, B.F., Silva, F.O., Kevan, P.G., and Sheffield, C.S. 2004. Effect of shading on trap nest utilization by hole-nesting aculeate Hymenoptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 136: 889–891.Google Scholar
Torchio, P.F. 1987. Use of non-honey bee species as pollinators of crops. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 118: 111–124.Google Scholar
Vaughan, M. and Black, S.H. 2008. Native pollinators: how to protect and enhance habitat for native bees. Native Plants, 9: 80–91.Google Scholar
Westerfelt, P., Windefalk, O, Lindelow, A., Gustafsson, L., and Weslien, J. 2015. Nesting of solitary wasps and bees in natural and artificial holes in dead wood in young boreal forest stands. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 8: 493–504.Google Scholar
Wratten, S.D., Gillespie, M., Decourtye, A., Mader, E., and Desneux, N. 2012. Pollinator habitat enhancement: benefits to other ecosystem services. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 159: 112–122.Google Scholar
Yarborough, D.E. 1997. Production trends in the wild blueberry industry in North America. Acta Horticulturae, 446: 33–35.Google Scholar
Yarborough, D.E. 2012. Establishment and management of the cultivated lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium). International Journal of Fruit Science, 12: 14–22.Google Scholar
Zurbuchen, A., Landert, L., Klaiber, J., Muller, A., Hein, S., and Dorn, S. 2010. Maximum foraging ranges in solitary bees: only few individuals have the capability to cover long foraging distances. Biological Conservation, 143: 669–676.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

McCallum et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download McCallum et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 54.1 KB