Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:23:43.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ALAR POCKET OF THE MALE MONARCH BUTTERFLY (DANAUS P. PLEXIPPUS) (DANAIDAE: LEPIDOPTERA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. A. Urquhart
F. A. Urquhart
Affiliation:
Scarborough College, University of Toronto, West Hill, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The alar pocket, located on the upper surface of the hind wing of the male monarch butterfly (Danaus p. plexippus) appears to be of a glandular nature, as is indicated by the cells associated with the androconia and as described by authors reviewed in this paper. Two distinct kinds of modified scales are associated with the cells; one (here termed the "patellate scale") has a relatively broad blade and a deeply penetrating stalk while the other (here termed the "poculate scale") is hair-like, fragile, and penetrates the cell membrane for a short distance. The cell of the poculate scale has a chitinous lip that extends above the plane surface forming a cup-like appearance while the patellate scale is associated with a slightly depressed area. In view of the absence of wing scales at the entrance to the lip of the alar pocket of some species of Danaidae, it has been postulated by many authors that this was caused by the insertion of the male hair pencils into the pocket in order to extract the substance emanating from the gland cells. In the present study there was no evidence of scales being removed from the lip of the pocket and hence it is concluded that such does not take place in this species. It is suggested that the poculate scales, being readily dissociated from the cells, may carry the odour to the outside in a manner similar to that of the spherules or "dust" described for Danaus gelippus berenice. Owing to a lack of experimental data, the function of the alar pockets remains ambiguous.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 7 , July 1976 , pp. 777 - 782
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, J. 1872. The markings on the Battledore Scales of some of the Lepidoptera. London. 56 pp.Google Scholar
Brower, L. P. and Brower, J. Van Z.. 1965. Courtship behavior of the queen butterfly, Danaus gilippus berenice (Cramer). Zoologica 50(1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Brower, L. P. and Jones, M. A.. 1965. Precourtship interaction of wing and abdominal sex glands in male Danaus butterflies. Proc. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 40: 147.Google Scholar
Deschamps, B. 1835. Recherches microsopiques sur l'organisation des ailes des Lépidoptères. Annls Sci. nat. 3: 11.Google Scholar
Doubleday, E., Westwood, J. O., and Hewitson, W. C.. 1846. Genera of diurnal Lepidoptera. Longmans, Green, London.Google Scholar
Eltringham, H. 1913. On the scent apparatus in the male of Amauris niavius Linn. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1913 (II): 399–406.Google Scholar
Eltringham, H. 1915. Further observations on the structure of the scent organs in certain male danaine butterflies. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1915 (i): 152–176.Google Scholar
Eltringham, H. 1925. On the abdominal glands in Heliconius (Lepidoptera). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1925 (I, II): 269–275.Google Scholar
Eltringham, H. 1929. On the scent organs of Opsiphanes cassiae lucullus Fruhst (Lepidoptera; Brassolidae). Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 77: 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiling, H. H. 1909. Duftorgane der weiblichen schmetterlinge nebst Beiträgen zur kentniss der sinnesorgane auf dem schmetterlingsflügel und der Duftpinsel der Mannchen von Danais und Euploea. Z. wiss. Zool. 92: 210–290.Google Scholar
Hausman, S. A. 1951. The scent-producing organ of the male monarch butterfly. Am. Nat. 85(825): 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illig, K. G. 1902. Duftorgane der männlichen schmetterlinge. Zoologica, Stuttg. 38: 1–34.Google Scholar
Kirby, W. K. 1826. Introduction to entomology. London. 325 pp.Google Scholar
Lambom, W. A., Dixey, F. A., and Poulton, E. B.. 1912. Amauris egialea stroking the brands of the hindwings with its anal tufts. Proc. ent. Soc. Lond. 1912: XXXIV–XXXVII.Google Scholar
Lindley, J. 1832. An introduction to botany. London. 379 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F. 1877. On the scent-organs of the butterflies, Epicalia acontius, Linn., and Myscelia orsis, Drury. Arch. Mus. nac., Rio de J. 2: 31–35.Google Scholar
In Longstaff, G. B., 1912, Butterfly hunting in many lands (English translation). Longmans, Green, London. p. 621.Google Scholar
Müller, F. 1879. On the sexual spots of the males of Danais erippus and D. gilippus. Arch. Mus. nac., Rio de J. 2: 25–29.Google Scholar
In Longstaff, G. B., 1912, Butterfly hunting in many lands (English translation.) Longmans, Green, London. pp. 616–619.Google Scholar
Pliske, T. E. and Eisner, T.. 1969. Sex pheromone of the queen butterfly: Biology. Science 164: 1170–1172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, M. B. 1893. The androchonia of Lepidoptera. Am. Nat. (Nov.): 1018–1021.Google Scholar
Urquhart, F. A. 1960. The monarch butterfly. Univ. Toronto Press. 361 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, J. 1865. On certain scales of some diurnal Lepidoptera. Mem. lit. philos. Soc. 2(3). London.Google Scholar
Watson, J. 1869. Further remarks on the plumulus of Battledore Scales of some of the Lepidoptera. Mem. lit. philos. Soc. 3(3). London.Google Scholar
Wonfor, T. W. 1869. On certain butterfly scales characteristic of sex. Ql J. microsc. Sci. 8: 268.Google Scholar