Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:19:17.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2-Undecyloxy-1-ethanol in combination with other semiochemicals attracts three Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in British Columbia, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2012

Jorge E. Macias-Samano*
Affiliation:
Synergy Semiochemicals Corp., 7061 Merritt Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia V5J 4R7, Canada
David Wakarchuk
Affiliation:
Synergy Semiochemicals Corp., 7061 Merritt Avenue, Burnaby, British Columbia V5J 4R7, Canada
Jocelyn G. Millar
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States of America
Lawrence M. Hanks
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Two species in the genus Monochamus Dejean (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) have recently been shown to have the same male-produced sex pheromone, 2-undecyloxy-1-ethanol (monochamol), suggesting that other congeners may share the same pheromone. We tested that hypothesis by conducting field bioassays of monochamol, in combination with bark-beetle pheromones and the host plant volatiles ethanol and α-pinene, in southern British Columbia, Canada. We captured 603 Monochamus clamator (LeConte), 63 Monochamus obtusus Casey, 245 Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (tribe Monochamini), and 42 Acanthocinus princeps (Walker) (tribe Acanthocinini). All three Monochamus species were significantly attracted to the combination of monochamol and host plant volatiles, whereas bark-beetle pheromones plus plant volatiles and plant volatiles alone were minimally attractive. Adding bark-beetle pheromones to the monochamol plus plant volatiles treatment synergised attraction of M. clamator, but not the other two Monochamus species. Acanthocinus princeps was most strongly attracted to the combination of bark-beetle pheromones and plant volatiles, and did not appear to be affected by the presence or absence of monochamol in baits. We conclude that monochamol is a likely pheromone component for the three Monochamus species, and that monochamol plus host plant volatiles is an effective attractant for these and perhaps other North American Monochamus species.

Résumé

On a démontré récemment que deux espèces du genre Monochamus Dejean (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Lamiinae) possédaient la même phéromone sexuelle mâle, le 2-undécyloxy-1-éthanol (monochamol), ce qui laisse croire que d'autres congénères pourraient aussi avoir cette même phéromone. Nous avons testé cette hypothèse par des bioessais de monochamol en nature en combinaison avec des phéromones de scolytes et des produits volatils de la plante-hôte, l’éthanol et l’ α-pynène, dans le sud de la Colombie-Britannique, Canada. Nous avons capturé 603 Monochamus clamator (LeConte), 63 Monochamus obtusus Casey, 245 Monochamus scutellatus (Say) (tribu des Monochamini) et 42 Acanthocinus princeps (Walker) (tribu des Acanthocinini). Les trois espèces de Monochamus sont fortement attirées par la combinaison de monochamol et de produits volatils de la plante-hôte, alors que les phéromones de scolytes additionnées de produits volatils de la plante hôte et les produits volatils de la plante hôte seuls exercent très peu d'attraction. L'addition de phéromones de scolytes à la combinaison de monochamol et de produits volatils de la plante hôte a un effet synergique d'attraction chez M. clamator, mais non chez les deux autres espèces de Monochamus. Acanthocinus princeps est le plus fortement attiré par la combinaison de phéromones de scolytes et de produits volatils de plante et ne semble pas être affecté par la présence ou l'absence de monochamol dans les appâts. Nous concluons que le monochamol est vraisemblablement l'une des composantes de la phéromone des trois espèces de Monochamus et que la combinaison de monochamol et de produits volatils de la plante hôte a un pouvoir efficace d'attraction chez ces espèces et peut-être chez d'autres espèces nord-américaines de Monochamus.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, J.D., Borden, J.H., McIntosh, R.L., De Groot, P., Gries, R. 2001. Kairomonal response by four Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to bark beetle pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27: 633646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, J.D., Borden, J.H., Seybold, S.J. 2004. A review of the chemical ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera). Chemoecology, 14: 123150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, J.D., Morewood, W.D., Borden, H.J., Hein, K.E., Wilson, I.M. 2003. Differential bio-activity of Ips and Dendroctonus pheromone components for Monochamus clamator and M. scutellatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology, 32: 2330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbour, J.D., Millar, J.G., Rodstein, J., Ray, A.M., Alston, D.G., Rejzek, M., et al. 2011. Synthetic 3,5-dimethyldodecanoic acid serves as a general attractant for multiple species of Prionus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 104: 588593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Champlain, A.B.Kirk, J.N. 1932. Fermenting baits for trapping Elateridae and Cerambycidae (Coleopt.). Entomological News, 10: 253257.Google Scholar
Costello, S.L., Negrón, J.F., Jacobi, W.R. 2008. Traps and attractants for wood-boring insects in ponderosa pine stands in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101: 409420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanks, L.M., Millar, J.G., Mongold-Diers, J.A., Wong, J.C.H., Meier, L.R., Reagel, P.F., et al. 2012. Using blends of cerambycid beetle pheromones and host plant volatiles to simultaneously attract a diversity of cerambycid species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42: 10501059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, L.M., Millar, J.G., Moreira, J.A., Barbour, J.D., Lacey, E.S., McElfresh, J.S., et al. 2007. Using generic pheromone lures to expedite identification of aggregation pheromones for the cerambycid beetles Xylotrechus nauticus, Phymatodes lecontei, and Neoclytus modestus modestus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33: 889907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibeas, F., Gallego, D., Diez, J.J., Pajares, J.A. 2006. An operational kairomonal lure for managing pine sawyer beetle Monochamus galloprovincialis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 131: 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingafelter, S.W. 2007. Illustrated key to the longhorned wood-boring beetles of the eastern United States. Coleopterists Society, North Potomac, Maryland, United States of America.Google Scholar
Millar, J.G., Hanks, L.M., Moreira, J.A., Barbour, J.D., Lacey, E.S. 2009. Pheromone chemistry of cerambycid beetles. In Chemical ecology of wood-boring insects. Edited by K. Nakamura and J.G. Millar. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Ibaraki, Japan. pp. 5279.Google Scholar
Miller, D.R. 2006. Ethanol and (-)-α-pinene: attractant kairomone for some large wood-boring beetles in southeastern USA. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 32: 779794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, D.R., Asaro, C., Crowe, C., Duerr, D. 2011. Bark beetle pheromones and pine volatiles: attractant kairomone lure blend for longhorn beetles (Cerambycidae) in pine stands of the southeastern United States. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104: 12451257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, R.F., Graham, E.E., Wong, J.C.H., Reagel, P.F., Striman, B.L., Hughes, G.P., et al. 2011. Fuscumol and fuscumol acetate are general attractants for many species of cerambycid beetles in the subfamily Lamiinae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 141: 7177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajares, J.A., Alvarez, G., Ibeas, F., Gallego, D., Hall, D.R., Farman, D.I. 2010. Identification and field activity of a male-produced aggregation pheromone in the pine sawyer beetle, Monochamus galloprovincialis. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 36: 570583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, T.W., Wilkening, A.J., Atkinson, T.H., Nation, J.L., Wilkinson, R.C., Foltz, J.L. 1988. Synergism of turpentine and ethanol as attractants for certain pine-infesting beetles (Coleoptera). Environmental Entomology, 17: 456462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 2001. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Silk, P.J., Sweeney, J.D., Wu, J., Price, J., Gutowski, J.M., Kettela, E.G. 2007. Evidence for a male-produced pheromone in Tetropium fuscum (F.) and Tetropium cinnamopterum (Kirby) (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Naturwissenschaften, 94: 697701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steele, R.G.D.Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics, 2nd ed.. McGraw-Hill, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Teale, S.A., Wickham, J.D., Zhang, F., Su, J., Chen, Y., Xiao, W., et al. 2011. A male-produced aggregation pheromone of Monochamus alternatus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), a major vector of pine wood nematode. Journal of Economic Entomology, 104: 15921598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar