Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:39:32.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV: Documents I–EE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 December 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Text
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 256 note 1 The property is the same as that disputed in document K; see statement quoting Henry de Enfield's will in Guildhall MS. Calendar of Rolls of Assizes, p. 65.

page 256 note 2 The parish of St. John is shown on the Roll to have been that of St. John Zachary.

page 257 note 1 Tuesday, 2 November 1290.

page 257 note 2 Monday, 21 May 1291.

page 257 note 3 This property is the same as that mentioned in document J.

page 261 note 1 Cf. Col. Inquisitions Post Mortem, i. 178 ; Roberts, Cal. Genealogicum, p. 634. Licence to alienate was given for a fine by the prioress 1 November 1303, Cal. of Pat. Rolls, 1301–7, p. 164.

page 262 note 1 Margaret, possibly a mistake for Margery, see M.

page 262 note 2 Parish of St. Ethelburga. Her effort to get this 12s. rent involved the prioress in a lawsuit. See City Records, Common Pleas Roll 22, for Roger Crok's action against her.

page 265 note 1 See no. 215. Cf. De Banco Roll 5, 57 (no. 6, 47d) ; Dorset (Mich. 2/3 Ed. I) ; 7, 28 (and 8, 19d) Dorset (Hilary, 3 Ed. I) ; and 123, 87 (Easter, 26 Ed. I).

page 268 note 1 Ralph, i.e. Baldock.