^{page xlvii note 1} Infra, pp. 8, 25, 38–9.

^{page xlvii note 2} They are recorded, in a very confused way, in the Parliamentary Surveys of 1650 as ‘ the Quitt rents due from the Free and Customary tenants holding of the sayd Manor and Hundred (of Thedwarstre) they being not to be distinguisht ’. The Surveys are in the Public Record Office (E 317, 5; E 317, 8; E 317, 12).

^{page xlviii note 1} Fines made in the king's court are not included, since they either have been or soon will be published by the Pipe Roll Society.

^{page l note l} The list is printed in Robertson, Anglo-Saxon Charters, pp. 194–6.

^{page l note 2} Camb., Add. MS. 6006, fos. 61vé62r.

^{page l note 3} The system was further modified towards the end of the thirteenth century. See the list in Pinchbeck, i. 340 ff., which derives ultimately from Camb., Add. MS. 6006, fos. 40 ff.

^l The list is printed in Robertson, Anglo-Saxon Charters, pp. 194–6.

² Camb., Add. MS. 6006, fos. 61vé62r.

³ The system was further modified towards the end of the thirteenth century. See the list in Pinchbeck, i. 340 ff., which derives ultimately from Camb., Add. MS. 6006, fos. 40 ff.

^{page li note 1} Jocelin, p. 8.

^{page li note 2} Jocelin, p. 27, and Charter 56.

^{page li note 3} Pinchbeck, i. 431, and Charter 60. See also Charters 57, 59, 85, 106, 107, 111.

^{page li note 4} Curia Regis Rolls, ed. C. T. Flower (1923), i. 457, and Charter 80.

^{page li note 5} Charters 58 and 105.

^{page li note 6} Charter 48 and Curia Regis Rolls, ed. Flower, vi. 206. See also Charters 26, 100, 121, 122, 123, 124, 130.

^{page li note 7} Jocelin, pp. 124–30.

^{page li note 8} Jocelin, p. 125.

^{page li note 9} ‘Electio Hugonis ’, Memorials, ii. 32.

^{page li note 10} Jocelin, p. 36.

^{page li note 11} Jocelin, p. 114.

^{page li note 12} Joceiin, pp. 87–90, 122.

^{page liv note 1} Jocelin, p. 1.

^{page liv note 2} Jocelin, p. 26.

^{page liv note 3} Jocelin, p. 36.

^{page liv note 4} Jocelin, p. 129.

^{page liv note 5} Jocelin, p. 68.

^{page liv note 6} Memorials, ii. 32.

^{page liv note 7} Jocelin, p. 123.

^{page liv note 8} Jocelin, p. 129.

^{page liv note 9} Jocelin, pp. 88–9. ‘ Retorquebat prior culpam in celerarium, celerarius in hospitiarium ’, etc., and ‘ deposuit [abbas] celerarium et hospitiarium et alios duos monachos substituit habentes nomina sub-celerarii et hospitarii ’. The point of the last passage is that since Abbot Samson was nominally keeping the cellary in his own hands, there could be no cellarer but only a subcellarer ; thus instead of having a cellarer and a hospitiarius to manage the cellary, there was a sub-cellarer and hospitiarius. By Michaelmas the sub-cellarer was promoted to cellarer ; the department was once again in the hands of a cellarer and hospitiarius. For the guest-house being part of the cellarer's responsibility, see also Jocelin, pp. 6, 35, 39. Although the Electio Hugonis apparently names all the monks and their offices, it mentions only a sub-cellarer and not a guest-master.

^{page lv note 1} Jocelin, pp. 87–91.

^{page lv note 2} Jocelin, pp. 99–105.

^{page lv note 3} Jocelin, pp. 117–20.

^{page lv note 4} Jocelin, pp. 122–3.

^{page lv note 5} Jocelin, p. 131.

^{page lv note 6} Jocelin, p. 137.

^{page lvi note 1} Jocelin, p. 90.

^{page lvi note 2} Jocelin, p. 137.

^{page lvi note 3} Jocelin, p. 129.

^{page lvi note 4} Memorials, ii. pp. xi–xii.

^{page lvii note 1} Memorials, ii. 76.

^{page lvii note 2} He had to make the sacrist the villain of the piece; Memorials, ii. 77 and p. xxiii.