No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2010
page 131 note a “Kinges might and antiently ” MS.
page 143 note a Two blank sheets are left, as if for entering the petition on religion and the debate of the 10th.
page 144 note a This should be Tacitus; “Inter alniptam contumaeiam et deforme obsequium,” Ann. iv. 20.
page 146 note a So in the MS. but the argument requires “a precedent; ” and so it appears to haye been replied to by Sherland, p. 148.
page 147 note a Paper torn, blanks filled up from conjecture.