Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:21:18.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Case of Williams dismissed for a trivial perjury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part I.—Star Chamber Reports
Information
Camden New Series , Volume 39 , July 1886 , pp. 78
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Historical Society 1886

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 79 note a i.e. Deyncourt.

page 79 note b To instruct the jury, or promise reward for or before appearance.— Cowell's Law Dictionary.

page 80 note a i.e. Leake.